+- Wanderlodge Gurus - The Member Funded Wanderlodge Forum (http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com)
+-- Forum: Yahoo Groups Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=61)
+--- Forum: WanderlodgeForum (/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Thread: Good %$#@ morning (/showthread.php?tid=3262)
Good %$#@ morning - Gardner Yeaw - 08-23-2006 12:48
ILast night I checked and adjusted the preasure in all of my tires.
The RIGHT front valve didn't seal after I checked it, but once I added
air it sealed up ok.
This morning I went out and the LEFT front was flat, and the bead
was seperated from the rim. I called Good Sam (lucky I signed up last
week) and the guy was scheduled and there in 1 1/2 hours and fixed me
up. I guess it is a good practice to replace the valves periodically
as a maintenance item. This could have been a real mess if I was on
the road.
The tires are only three years old, I would have thought they would
replace the valves at the same time, but I guess not.
Gardner
78FC33
Good %$#@ morning - Pete Masterson - 08-23-2006 15:26
I had a similar thing happen. I suspect that the tire pressures have
been so infrequently checked that the valves are sticky from lack of
use. In my case, I discovered the flat (outside dual) 100 yards from
a Les Schwab tire store --- who removed the tire, checked it, and
remounted it .... at no charge. (The tires were purchased from a
Schwab store by the previous owner. New valve stems were installed
when the tires were replaced.)
I have purchased a half-dozen tire valve cores to keep on hand "just
in case."
Pete Masterson
aeonix1@...
'95 Bluebird Wanderlodge WBDA 4203
El Sobrante, CA
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Gardner Yeaw wrote:
> ILast night I checked and adjusted the preasure in all of my tires.
> The RIGHT front valve didn't seal after I checked it, but once I added
> air it sealed up ok.
> This morning I went out and the LEFT front was flat, and the bead
> was seperated from the rim. I called Good Sam (lucky I signed up last
> week) and the guy was scheduled and there in 1 1/2 hours and fixed me
> up. I guess it is a good practice to replace the valves periodically
> as a maintenance item. This could have been a real mess if I was on
> the road.
>
> The tires are only three years old, I would have thought they would
> replace the valves at the same time, but I guess not.
>
> Gardner
> 78FC33
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Good %$#@ morning - Chris Reed - 08-23-2006 16:27
Had new tires put on few months back and to my suprise, I did not get new valve
stems either. Did not know until I came out and had 2 flat tires....Lets
see...New tires for car at WalMart for $350.00 I get new valve stems but
$2,000.00 tires from the truck place and I get stuck with the old ones? Next
time I will watch very closely!!!
Pete Masterson
I had a similar thing happen. I suspect that the tire pressures have
been so infrequently checked that the valves are sticky from lack of
use. In my case, I discovered the flat (outside dual) 100 yards from
a Les Schwab tire store --- who removed the tire, checked it, and
remounted it .... at no charge. (The tires were purchased from a
Schwab store by the previous owner. New valve stems were installed
when the tires were replaced.)
I have purchased a half-dozen tire valve cores to keep on hand "just
in case."
Pete Masterson
aeonix1@...
'95 Bluebird Wanderlodge WBDA 4203
El Sobrante, CA
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Gardner Yeaw wrote:
> ILast night I checked and adjusted the preasure in all of my tires.
> The RIGHT front valve didn't seal after I checked it, but once I added
> air it sealed up ok.
> This morning I went out and the LEFT front was flat, and the bead
> was seperated from the rim. I called Good Sam (lucky I signed up last
> week) and the guy was scheduled and there in 1 1/2 hours and fixed me
> up. I guess it is a good practice to replace the valves periodically
> as a maintenance item. This could have been a real mess if I was on
> the road.
>
> The tires are only three years old, I would have thought they would
> replace the valves at the same time, but I guess not.
>
> Gardner
> 78FC33
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]