M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
|
08-18-2006, 08:23
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
We've got a 2004 M380, which has been a very good coach. However, we
find we spend more time parked than driving and we'd like the extra room more slides provide, without sacrificing quality. We frankly can't see the difference between our coach and the other fiberglass monocoque coaches like Country Coach and the Monaco products, except for the number of slideouts. How are the walls, floors and ceilings constructed on our coach compared to the others? Is our chassis stronger? Why did they switch to aluminum on the new M380? I contacted Blue Bird with these questions and have not received an answer. Thanks in advance for your help. Dick Friedkin 2004 M380 |
|||
08-18-2006, 08:24
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
We've got a 2004 M380, which has been a very good coach. However, we
find we spend more time parked than driving and we'd like the extra room more slides provide, without sacrificing quality. We frankly can't see the difference between our coach and the other fiberglass monocoque coaches like Country Coach and the Monaco products, except for the number of slideouts. How are the walls, floors and ceilings constructed on our coach compared to the others? Is our chassis stronger? Why did they switch to aluminum on the new M380? I contacted Blue Bird with these questions and have not received an answer. Thanks in advance for your help. Dick Friedkin 2004 M380 |
|||
08-18-2006, 15:23
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
Hey Dick, We just returned from the FMCA Rally in Charlotte NC. Truly
a great experience! There were 3000-4000 coaches in attendance and lots, read tons of rain, and lots of coaches stuck in the mud. We viewed many coaches while there. Some of the mfgrs were Monaco, Country Coach, Newell, Prevost, Holiday Rambler, Mandalay the list goes on. We have our 86FC for sale and looking for our next coach. When ever that may be. I must tell you from my standpoint there was a HUGE difference in quality. Especially, when one really looks for quality. Particle board cabinets, entry steps that give way, cheesy hinges, fit and finish were way off. Actually, we were not impressed. The Newell's were fine! 40' coach with a 37' turning radius! Beautiful slide outs with air craft type seals. About 1.4mil worth of fine though! Many "neighbors" were not having much fun during the rain. Many leaks on newer coaches. Not to mention many coaches flooded in the infield, water to the floor. So much for gensets and entertainment centers! One was even pushed off its jacks! The folks parked next to us had some tough issues. I am not trying to slam one against the other, by any means, but just sharing an experience. When they returned after some evening entertainment, I notice he was out in the rain, it was raining hard. His partner was dumping water out by the buckets, they had a CC Intrique, I went to help the guy out. His windsheild popped out in the upper right hand corner, by more than 2". He was mad! His coach was three yrs old. Never fear duct tape worked we used a ton of it! Several, Holiday Rambler slides were leaking, they have a rubber "wiper" type seal around the slide. (neighbor in front of us) I would suggest to question the structural integrity of the wall that has the slides, also access to the bays under the slide. All things I noticed. Fleetwood has a slide I think it is 29'(huge, whole side of coach) but when questioning the sales guy about structural integrity, there was not a good enough answer! Check for yourself. Our final conclusion was that for the money (our money) we would find it hard to move away from BB. With the impending sale of BlueBird I will be watching closely the new owners philosophy, when it comes to making a Blue Bird and changes to make the coach competitive in today's market. Watch for a press release in the next 10 days!! Big changes ahead! ScottB 86FC35 "RUBY" 4sale SC --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "richardfriedkin" > > We've got a 2004 M380, which has been a very good coach. However, we > find we spend more time parked than driving and we'd like the extra > room more slides provide, without sacrificing quality. We frankly > can't see the difference between our coach and the other fiberglass > monocoque coaches like Country Coach and the Monaco products, except > for the number of slideouts. How are the walls, floors and ceilings > constructed on our coach compared to the others? Is our chassis > stronger? Why did they switch to aluminum on the new M380? I contacted > Blue Bird with these questions and have not received an answer. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > Dick Friedkin > 2004 M380 > |
|||
08-27-2006, 03:46
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 slides. I also have a
new Prevost. I use the Prevost for Rallys and general traveling and the M380 for back woods, sand dunes, Mexico, etc. I find the BB drives and handles great. I'm hoping the new owners produce a tripple slide. I've looked at other motorhomes in the 38 ft range, but cannot find one that has the safety up front. On one of my previous motorhome by another Company, I forgot to set the em brake and it rolled 8 ft and hit a small pine tree at the drivers headlight. The whole front corner fell off and hit the street. There was nothing behind the light to stop anything from hitting my feet. Does anyone know of a a motorhome that has up front strong bumper. I'm setting next to a new CC and a 2004 beaver. We got underneath and looked at the front support. Nothing Glenn --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "richardfriedkin" > > We've got a 2004 M380, which has been a very good coach. However, we > find we spend more time parked than driving and we'd like the extra > room more slides provide, without sacrificing quality. We frankly > can't see the difference between our coach and the other fiberglass > monocoque coaches like Country Coach and the Monaco products, except > for the number of slideouts. How are the walls, floors and ceilings > constructed on our coach compared to the others? Is our chassis > stronger? Why did they switch to aluminum on the new M380? I contacted > Blue Bird with these questions and have not received an answer. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > Dick Friedkin > 2004 M380 > |
|||
08-27-2006, 07:26
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
Glenn, Do you chose the numbers or was it a quickpick?
I want a retrofit slide on my 94pt but dont want to lose interior spaceousness when it is tucked GregoryOConnor 94ptRomolandCa --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gepatch" wrote: > > I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 slides. I also have a > new Prevost. I use the Prevost for Rallys and general traveling and > the M380 for back woods, sand dunes, Mexico, etc. I find the BB > drives and handles great. I'm hoping the new owners produce a > tripple slide. > I've looked at other motorhomes in the 38 ft range, but cannot find > one that has the safety up front. > On one of my previous motorhome by another Company, I forgot to set > the em brake and it rolled 8 ft and hit a small pine tree at the > drivers headlight. The whole front corner fell off and hit the > street. There was nothing behind the light to stop anything from > hitting my feet. > Does anyone know of a a motorhome that has up front strong bumper. > I'm setting next to a new CC and a 2004 beaver. We got underneath > and looked at the front support. Nothing > > Glenn |
|||
08-27-2006, 08:29
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
Glenn:
Cannot speak for others on the Forum just myself. If I understand your post, the M380 is expendable because it does not have 3 slides, you drive it in the back woods and other places that would trash the Prevost. You have found that BBs' are tough. Do not want to read anything into this just assuming. And you know what ass/u/mi/ng means. My old bird which does not have slides, is built like a tank. I'm comfortable with it. I am not concerned about the bumper falling off any time soon. I have also considered a slide modification. Outside the door is a big world. Ever seen a glass drag boat explode into a million pieces in an accident? Glass motor homes will do the same. Accordingly, I do not believe there are any glass coaches available that meet the standard of BB or Prevost. Sooo, you could always purchase a glass bus with 3 slides, be very aware on the road and when you are done send it to the boneyard, or wait and see what BB does. Someone will buy the M380. I gotta say, I envy your position. Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40 Niceville, FL ----- Original Message ----- From: gepatch To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 10:46 AM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: M380 vs other fiberglass coaches I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 slides. I also have a new Prevost. I use the Prevost for Rallys and general traveling and the M380 for back woods, sand dunes, Mexico, etc. I find the BB drives and handles great. I'm hoping the new owners produce a tripple slide. I've looked at other motorhomes in the 38 ft range, but cannot find one that has the safety up front. On one of my previous motorhome by another Company, I forgot to set the em brake and it rolled 8 ft and hit a small pine tree at the drivers headlight. The whole front corner fell off and hit the street. There was nothing behind the light to stop anything from hitting my feet. Does anyone know of a a motorhome that has up front strong bumper. I'm setting next to a new CC and a 2004 beaver. We got underneath and looked at the front support. Nothing Glenn --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "richardfriedkin" > > We've got a 2004 M380, which has been a very good coach. However, we > find we spend more time parked than driving and we'd like the extra > room more slides provide, without sacrificing quality. We frankly > can't see the difference between our coach and the other fiberglass > monocoque coaches like Country Coach and the Monaco products, except > for the number of slideouts. How are the walls, floors and ceilings > constructed on our coach compared to the others? Is our chassis > stronger? Why did they switch to aluminum on the new M380? I contacted > Blue Bird with these questions and have not received an answer. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > Dick Friedkin > 2004 M380 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
08-27-2006, 11:09
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
Hi Dick,
I'm a bit confused by the following: > I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 > slides. As BB hasn't been making the 380 for long, what is behind your decision to dispose of the first one in favor of the second? > I also have a new Prevost. As Prevost doesn't really make a coach, but does manufacture a great chassis that various folks convert into a coach, from which converter did you purchase and what were your reasons for choosing them? Did you choose the H3 or XLII chassis, and how many slides does it have? John Suter currently coachless __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|||
08-27-2006, 18:02
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
John
sorry for the confusion in my post. I purchased a M380 while I was waiting for my Prevost to be completed by Bruce Coach in Salmon Arms Canada. When the new Prevost was delivered I sold the 380. I missed driving the M380. I enjoyed driving it in the woods and back country, so I purchased another one. I love it except, I want 3 slides. I'm hoping the new company that purchased BB will see the market for a 3 slide 38 footer. Glenn --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, John Suter wrote: > > Hi Dick, > > I'm a bit confused by the following: > > > I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 > > slides. > > As BB hasn't been making the 380 for long, what is > behind your decision to dispose of the first one in > favor of the second? > > > I also have a new Prevost. > > As Prevost doesn't really make a coach, but does > manufacture a great chassis that various folks convert > into a coach, from which converter did you purchase > and what were your reasons for choosing them? > Did you choose the H3 or XLII chassis, and how many > slides does it have? > > John Suter > currently coachless > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > |
|||
08-28-2006, 04:46
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
Dick, I have been on these factory tours, Blue Bird, Alpine, Beaver-
Bend Or, Road Master, Monaco, Marathon, and visited Featherlite. I cannot speak about the Prevost as they come as a unit to the converter. But here is what I know about the others. They build a frame and weld on the lower supporting structure to the frame. Many of the welds that I saw were welded incorrectly and over welded. Blue Bird builds the frame and builds the sub substructure and then lower the frame into the substructure and bolts the two together, this is the way structural steel should be dealt with, the frame and the substructure metals are not compromised by welding. Then there are the ribs and the metal skin and roof and the rest of the coach being constructed after the shell is built. All the others use a vacuum bonded wall, a wall with a metal frame that has fiberglass on one side insulation and the interior wood then glued together and vacuum bonded, ever heard of "De-laminating." What they do is, build a chassis to include the floor, they load it with all the plumbing, wiring and cabinets and furniture, and then they bring in a pre-constructed wall and lower it to the floor and set the wall on the floor and spot-weld or screw or bolt the wall to the floor. Then the roof is lowered on and the same process. It's all good on the factory floor. What happens after the coach is on the road? When you pull it into a driveway and the frame stressed? The box gives, spot tack break, screws pull. That's why they fall apart, leak, rattle, and on and on. 95 BMC Marty |
|||
08-28-2006, 06:59
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
M380 vs other fiberglass coaches
---I cant stand it...I only use my three prevosts on months ending
with ..R... LOL Hank 90 SP36 80FC31 Prevost wannabeeee In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gepatch" wrote: > > John > sorry for the confusion in my post. I purchased a M380 while I was > waiting for my Prevost to be completed by Bruce Coach in Salmon Arms > Canada. When the new Prevost was delivered I sold the 380. I > missed driving the M380. I enjoyed driving it in the woods and back > country, so I purchased another one. I love it except, I want 3 > slides. I'm hoping the new company that purchased BB will see the > market for a 3 slide 38 footer. > > Glenn > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, John Suter > wrote: > > > > Hi Dick, > > > > I'm a bit confused by the following: > > > > > I'm on my second M380 and love it, But want 3 > > > slides. > > > > As BB hasn't been making the 380 for long, what is > > behind your decision to dispose of the first one in > > favor of the second? > > > > > I also have a new Prevost. > > > > As Prevost doesn't really make a coach, but does > > manufacture a great chassis that various folks convert > > into a coach, from which converter did you purchase > > and what were your reasons for choosing them? > > Did you choose the H3 or XLII chassis, and how many > > slides does it have? > > > > John Suter > > currently coachless > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)