6v92 vs 8v92
|
09-05-2006, 12:45
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
I am looking at a 83 PT40 with a 6v92. Probably 330 hp. It has a five
speed alison, does anyone know what model? I like to travel in to the mountains alot. Will I be happy with the 6v92? Will I be climbing the grades at 30 - 40 mph? Would those of you with 6v92 coaches let me know how it does on the hill or should I hold out for the 400 - 500 hp 8v92? Thanks Doug Long Edmonton Wanabee |
|||
09-05-2006, 15:20
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
The 83 PT40 had a 6V92TA. It was the Silver Series with 330hp. The
300hp Red only came in 1982 PT. The 5 speed Allison is a model MT654CR. You will be happy with the 6V92 in the mountains as long as you can be happy climbing at the 30-40mph you estimated. Even with a 3:73 rear that I had in mine they will struggle up long hills without a running start, and most of the 83 PTs had 3:36 rears. You will find yourself changing your driving style to go as fast as possible downhill when you see an uphill coming. If you are going to be in mountains a lot, save for an 8V model. Mike Bulriss 1983 PT40 "Stagecoach" - sold last year 1991 WB40 "Texas Minivan" San Antonio, TX --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "djlcanuck" > > I am looking at a 83 PT40 with a 6v92. Probably 330 hp. It has a five > speed alison, does anyone know what model? I like to travel in to the > mountains alot. Will I be happy with the 6v92? Will I be climbing the > grades at 30 - 40 mph? Would those of you with 6v92 coaches let me know > how it does on the hill or should I hold out for the 400 - 500 hp 8v92? > > Thanks > Doug Long > Edmonton > Wanabee > |
|||
09-05-2006, 17:21
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Sounds like a Detroit Diesel.
I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed, and they both have about the same great fuel milage stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and enjoyment while parked than that dude. Ron, No. California 85PT36 w/6V __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|||
09-05-2006, 17:34
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Hey Ron, My 38' 8v weighs 41460 with full fuel and has 475hp so that is 1hp for
every 87lbs. Just curious what is the ratio on your coach. It should be good for a 36pt. Dan Cen Miss 88 38 8v ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Faubion To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:21 AM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 Sounds like a Detroit Diesel. I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed, and they both have about the same great fuel milage stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and enjoyment while parked than that dude. Ron, No. California 85PT36 w/6V __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date: 9/4/2006 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-06-2006, 08:18
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Figer'n about 39,500lbs., and a 330HP is approximately
120 lbs. p/each one HP. Save a cuppala pounds if it's a 335HP? I have changed my driving habits as mentioned. I love the beast anyway. Ron, No. Calfornia 85PT36 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|||
09-06-2006, 08:18
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Figer'n about 39,500lbs., and a 330HP is approximately
120 lbs. p/each one HP. Save a cuppala pounds if it's a 335HP? I have changed my driving habits as mentioned. I love the beast anyway. Ron, No. Calfornia 85PT36 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|||
09-06-2006, 08:40
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Dan"
wrote: > So with 475hp what speed do you climb a 8% grade? Thanks Doug Long Edmonton Wanabee > Hey Ron, My 38' 8v weighs 41460 with full fuel and has 475hp so that is 1hp for every 87lbs. Just curious what is the ratio on your coach. It should be good for a 36pt. > Dan Cen Miss > 88 38 8v > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ron Faubion > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:21 AM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 > > > Sounds like a Detroit Diesel. > > I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making > it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed, > and they both have about the same great fuel milage > stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's > 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency > flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when > a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little > embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and > enjoyment while parked than that dude. > > Ron, No. California > 85PT36 w/6V > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date: 9/4/2006 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
|||
09-06-2006, 08:41
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Coming back from Idaho last weekend, my bird got down to 2nd gear. Kept the
rpm's up to 1900 and thus the oil pressure and water temp was normal. This is while pulling 8000 pounds of trailer and gear. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-06-2006, 10:34
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
Sorry, I don't know but I can say that on cruise control it rarely loses speed
going up a hill. Dan 88 38 8v ----- Original Message ----- From: djlcanuck To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:40 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Dan" wrote: > So with 475hp what speed do you climb a 8% grade? Thanks Doug Long Edmonton Wanabee > Hey Ron, My 38' 8v weighs 41460 with full fuel and has 475hp so that is 1hp for every 87lbs. Just curious what is the ratio on your coach. It should be good for a 36pt. > Dan Cen Miss > 88 38 8v > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ron Faubion > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:21 AM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 > > > Sounds like a Detroit Diesel. > > I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making > it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed, > and they both have about the same great fuel milage > stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's > 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency > flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when > a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little > embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and > enjoyment while parked than that dude. > > Ron, No. California > 85PT36 w/6V > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date: 9/4/2006 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.0/439 - Release Date: 9/6/2006 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-06-2006, 10:41
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
6v92 vs 8v92
I agree, it cruises right along.
Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40 Niceville, FL ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 Sorry, I don't know but I can say that on cruise control it rarely loses speed going up a hill. Dan 88 38 8v ----- Original Message ----- From: djlcanuck To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:40 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Dan" wrote: > So with 475hp what speed do you climb a 8% grade? Thanks Doug Long Edmonton Wanabee > Hey Ron, My 38' 8v weighs 41460 with full fuel and has 475hp so that is 1hp for every 87lbs. Just curious what is the ratio on your coach. It should be good for a 36pt. > Dan Cen Miss > 88 38 8v > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ron Faubion > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:21 AM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92 > > > Sounds like a Detroit Diesel. > > I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making > it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed, > and they both have about the same great fuel milage > stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's > 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency > flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when > a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little > embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and > enjoyment while parked than that dude. > > Ron, No. California > 85PT36 w/6V > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date: 9/4/2006 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ---------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.0/439 - Release Date: 9/6/2006 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)