Tire age vs wear
|
09-30-2007, 06:48
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the
guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? Scott Forman 86 PT38 Memphis |
|||
09-30-2007, 07:10
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
I'd replace the tires. It will cost less to replace them now than paying for
a tire (or two) when out on the road. On 9/30/07, Scott Forman <sforman@...> wrote: > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > > > -- Curt Sprenger 1987 PT38 8V92 "MacAttack Racing" Anaheim Hills, CA [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 09:27
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
Scott the tires themselves would be the cheapest cost. What really gets
expensive is the repairs required after a blowout. The damage a blowout can do to the body, wheel well and any cabling, hoses etc that transverse through the wheel well area really adds up. On 30/09/2007, Scott Forman <sforman@...> wrote: > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > > > -- Rob, Sue & Merlin Robinson 94 WLWB [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 09:39
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
My drive tires and tag tires were roughly 10 years old one year ago with no
visual evidence of any significant problems. When the tires were removed the side walls looked like cottage cheese in particular the inside wall of the duals. They were ready to go at anytime. fwiw. Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" Niceville, FL Royale Conversion ----- Original Message ----- From: Scott Forman To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:48 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Tire age vs wear The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? Scott Forman 86 PT38 Memphis [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 12:14
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
Scott, my tag tires were made in '99 and I'm going to replace 'em
first thing next spring. Actually, I'll put on new steer tires and move those to the tag (my drive & steer tires were made in '04 and still look like new) so I can always keep the newest tires up front. From everything I've read and everyone I've talked to, 8 years is the max you want to go regardless of how nice they look, so I'd replace those pronto. -Ryan On 9/30/07, Scott Forman <sforman@...> wrote: > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > |
|||
09-30-2007, 12:29
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
Leroy, When you say "inside" you are referring to the part of the
tire in which the tube would be in contact (if you in fact had tubed tires)? If you stripped the tires off the wheels and the insides looked good would you use them or is that a stupid question? The reason I ask is that I was ready to replace my ten year old tires and the tire dealership told me I didn't need to replace them because they showed absolutely no signs of weather deterioration.(He didn't look inside obviously). Now I am questioning his judgment. Hard to spring for tires when the TIRE DEALER says they are not needed. Old rubber is old rubber is old rubber is what I am reading to be the prevailing wisdom? I don't want to wast money but I feel this is pretty important. I guess what I am asking is if anyone supports the opinion of this particular tire dealer speak up. I assumed the fellow to be just exceptionally honest. Maybe he is just wrong? John Heckman central Pa 1973 FC > > My drive tires and tag tires were roughly 10 years old one year ago with no visual evidence of any significant problems. When the tires were removed the side walls looked like cottage cheese in particular the inside wall of the duals. They were ready to go at anytime. fwiw. > Leroy Eckert > 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" > Niceville, FL > Royale Conversion > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Forman > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:48 PM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Tire age vs wear > > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
|||
09-30-2007, 13:18
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
I have Alcoa rims and tubeless tires. The external sidewalls showed no signs of
checking or cracks. The tread was excellent. I decided to change them anyway because of age from Michelin to Sumitomo(No brand preference, just cost was considered). I was amazed at what I saw when the old tires were removed. The sidewalls were toast. I could bend them with my bare hands. I now have a schedule to change tires every 5 years needed or not. A single blown tires can cost you thousands, torn up undercarriage, hoses and possibly yours or someone else's life. It's only money. Is it Michelin that says "Your life is riding on your tires"? Whom ever it is is correct. Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" Niceville, FL Royale Conversion ----- Original Message ----- From: bubblerboy64 To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 7:29 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Tire age vs wear Leroy, When you say "inside" you are referring to the part of the tire in which the tube would be in contact (if you in fact had tubed tires)? If you stripped the tires off the wheels and the insides looked good would you use them or is that a stupid question? The reason I ask is that I was ready to replace my ten year old tires and the tire dealership told me I didn't need to replace them because they showed absolutely no signs of weather deterioration.(He didn't look inside obviously). Now I am questioning his judgment. Hard to spring for tires when the TIRE DEALER says they are not needed. Old rubber is old rubber is old rubber is what I am reading to be the prevailing wisdom? I don't want to wast money but I feel this is pretty important. I guess what I am asking is if anyone supports the opinion of this particular tire dealer speak up. I assumed the fellow to be just exceptionally honest. Maybe he is just wrong? John Heckman central Pa 1973 FC > > My drive tires and tag tires were roughly 10 years old one year ago with no visual evidence of any significant problems. When the tires were removed the side walls looked like cottage cheese in particular the inside wall of the duals. They were ready to go at anytime. fwiw. > Leroy Eckert > 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" > Niceville, FL > Royale Conversion > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Forman > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:48 PM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Tire age vs wear > > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 13:21
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
I'd ask the tire dealer to put it in writing and agree cover any
damages cost by a blown tire based on his opinion. (Was it the owner of the tire store or hired help that didn't want to handle a heavy tire that day?) The only way to be sure a tire is 'safe' is to inspect it thoroughly -- inside and out. If the tire isn't unmounted for an inspection, you have only looked at half the possible area of deterioration. Most tire companies suggest that 7 years is the maximum safe life span for a tire. There is one tire made for RVs (by Michelin, I think) that claims to have a 10 year life span. Personally, considering the odds, I wouldn't want to gamble on 10 year old tires -- but that's just me. Pete Masterson '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 El Sobrante CA aeonix1@... On Sep 30, 2007, at 5:29 PM, bubblerboy64 wrote: > Leroy, When you say "inside" you are referring to the part of the > tire in which the tube would be in contact (if you in fact had tubed > tires)? If you stripped the tires off the wheels and the insides > looked good would you use them or is that a stupid question? The > reason I ask is that I was ready to replace my ten year old tires and > the tire dealership told me I didn't need to replace them because > they showed absolutely no signs of weather deterioration.(He didn't > look inside obviously). Now I am questioning his judgment. Hard to > spring for tires when the TIRE DEALER says they are not needed. Old > rubber is old rubber is old rubber is what I am reading to be the > prevailing wisdom? I don't want to wast money but I feel this is > pretty important. I guess what I am asking is if anyone supports the > opinion of this particular tire dealer speak up. I assumed the > fellow to be just exceptionally honest. Maybe he is just wrong? > John Heckman > central Pa > 1973 FC > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 13:33
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
Well said guys! None of us should push our luck with tires on the beasts we
drive. Our local tire store said to come back at 4 years and they will give a good trade allowance for our current tires. They can sell them to an OTR driver who will wear them out in the next year of two. On 9/30/07, Leroy Eckert > > I have Alcoa rims and tubeless tires. The external sidewalls showed no > signs of checking or cracks. The tread was excellent. I decided to change > them anyway because of age from Michelin to Sumitomo(No brand preference, > just cost was considered). I was amazed at what I saw when the old tires > were removed. The sidewalls were toast. I could bend them with my bare > hands. I now have a schedule to change tires every 5 years needed or not. > A single blown tires can cost you thousands, torn up undercarriage, hoses > and possibly yours or someone else's life. It's only money. > Is it Michelin that says "Your life is riding on your tires"? Whom ever it > is is correct. > Leroy Eckert > 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" > Niceville, FL > Royale Conversion > ----- Original Message ----- > From: bubblerboy64 > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 7:29 PM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Tire age vs wear > > Leroy, When you say "inside" you are referring to the part of the > tire in which the tube would be in contact (if you in fact had tubed > tires)? If you stripped the tires off the wheels and the insides > looked good would you use them or is that a stupid question? The > reason I ask is that I was ready to replace my ten year old tires and > the tire dealership told me I didn't need to replace them because > they showed absolutely no signs of weather deterioration.(He didn't > look inside obviously). Now I am questioning his judgment. Hard to > spring for tires when the TIRE DEALER says they are not needed. Old > rubber is old rubber is old rubber is what I am reading to be the > prevailing wisdom? I don't want to wast money but I feel this is > pretty important. I guess what I am asking is if anyone supports the > opinion of this particular tire dealer speak up. I assumed the > fellow to be just exceptionally honest. Maybe he is just wrong? > John Heckman > central Pa > 1973 FC > > > > > My drive tires and tag tires were roughly 10 years old one year ago > with no visual evidence of any significant problems. When the tires > were removed the side walls looked like cottage cheese in particular > the inside wall of the duals. They were ready to go at anytime. fwiw. > > Leroy Eckert > > 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" > > Niceville, FL > > Royale Conversion > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Scott Forman > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:48 PM > > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Tire age vs wear > > > > > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to > the > > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as > far > > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely > based > > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other > tire? > > > > Scott Forman > > 86 PT38 > > Memphis > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Curt Sprenger 1987 PT38 8V92 "MacAttack Racing" Anaheim Hills, CA [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
09-30-2007, 15:41
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
Curt, I put the old set from my bus on my 10 wheeler dumptruck (Old
as 9 years-). There was little wear on them and I am hoping to get 8 months ( same as a set of recaps). If you want to rotate tires off your bus call me I'll buy them. A good program is to rotate a new set on the front of the bus every 2 years. that way you will always steer new tires and will be running on tires less than 6 years old. Your budget is one tire per the year (@$400.tire =$35.00 per month). ( @$300. for 11r22.5's, my dumptruck tire budget is $332.month.) GregoryO'Connor 94ptRomolandCa -- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Curt Sprenger" > > Well said guys! None of us should push our luck with tires on the beasts we > drive. Our local tire store said to come back at 4 years and they will give > a good trade allowance for our current tires. They can sell them to an OTR > driver who will wear them out in the next year of two. > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)