Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's

[Ron Thompson]

They are in pairs. I haven't seen any individual ones. I guess you could get them that way though. Not being a metallurgical engineer I will have to take the word of the manufacturer. I will buy US made. I think there are underwriting rules that they have to follow to get a load carrying rating. Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sun, 5/15/11, G Boyd wrote: From: G Boyd Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 12:39 AM Make sure the rating is what you think it is. Is this is pairs or individually? On 14 May 2011 12:08, Ron Thompson <cockyfox@...> wrote: Thats what I was thinking, that the 22 ton would be better. I have been checking prices and they run anywhere from $176.00 to over 300, depending where you get them from and where they were manyafactured. I am sorry, I just don't trust China steel. They don't seem to know how to temper steel very well. I have bought axes and they don't chip at the bite edge, they dent. If that is an example of good steel in China then I don't want my life dependent on them. I am a little apprehensive about the Pawl lock versus the pin lock. I trust the pin lock over the pawl lock. What do you think. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sat, 5/14/11, Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> wrote: From: Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 1:06 PM Ron I feel 20 ton or better is safest. as I recall the price difference isn’t much Fred & Jeanne Hulse Morristown,Arizona 97 WLWB41

[david brady]

Ron, I also have one of these, which I also like

very much: http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/p-9296-otc-5096a.aspx



David Brady, 02 LXi, NC



On 5/15/2011 8:19 AM, Ron Thompson wrote:

 

They are in pairs.  I haven't seen any individual ones.  I guess you could get them that way though.  Not being a metallurgical engineer I will have to take the word of the manufacturer.  I will buy US made.  I think there are underwriting rules that they have to follow to get a load carrying rating. Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' ("cockyfox@sbcglobal.net") --- On Sun, 5/15/11, G Boyd "gboyd007@gmail.com" wrote: From: G Boyd "gboyd007@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: "WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com" Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 12:39 AM   Make sure the rating is what you think it is. Is this is pairs or individually? On 14 May 2011 12:08, Ron Thompson <cockyfox@...> wrote:   Thats what I was thinking, that the 22 ton would be better.  I have been checking prices and they run anywhere from $176.00 to over 300, depending where you get them from and where they were manyafactured.  I am sorry, I just don't trust China steel.  They don't seem to know how to temper steel very well.  I have bought axes and they don't chip at the bite edge, they dent.  If that is an example of good steel in China then I don't want my life dependent on them. I am a little apprehensive about the Pawl lock versus the pin lock.  I trust the pin lock over the pawl lock.  What do you think. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sat, 5/14/11, Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> wrote: From: Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 1:06 PM   Ron I feel 20 ton or better is safest. as I recall the price difference isn’t much   Fred & Jeanne Hulse Morristown,Arizona 97 WLWB41

[Ron Thompson]

David, You know what, I was just thinking about something like that. I was going to build one myself. Thats a great tool. Only way to handle those heavy tires with the heavy rims. Thanks a lot for that website. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sun, 5/15/11, david brady wrote: From: david brady Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 9:33 AM Ron, I also have one of these, which I also like very much: http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/p-9296-otc-5096a.aspx David Brady, 02 LXi, NC On 5/15/2011 8:19 AM, Ron Thompson wrote: They are in pairs. I haven't seen any individual ones. I guess you could get them that way though. Not being a metallurgical engineer I will have to take the word of the manufacturer. I will buy US made. I think there are underwriting rules that they have to follow to get a load carrying rating. Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sun, 5/15/11, G Boyd wrote: From: G Boyd Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 12:39 AM Make sure the rating is what you think it is. Is this is pairs or individually? On 14 May 2011 12:08, Ron Thompson <cockyfox@...> wrote: Thats what I was thinking, that the 22 ton would be better. I have been checking prices and they run anywhere from $176.00 to over 300, depending where you get them from and where they were manyafactured. I am sorry, I just don't trust China steel. They don't seem to know how to temper steel very well. I have bought axes and they don't chip at the bite edge, they dent. If that is an example of good steel in China then I don't want my life dependent on them. I am a little apprehensive about the Pawl lock versus the pin lock. I trust the pin lock over the pawl lock. What do you think. Ron Thompson -Waller, Tx. 1995 WLWB 42' (cockyfox@...) --- On Sat, 5/14/11, Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> wrote: From: Fred Hulse <fhulse@...> Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Jack stands...for Wanderlodge's To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 1:06 PM Ron I feel 20 ton or better is safest. as I recall the price difference isn’t much Fred & Jeanne Hulse Morristown,Arizona 97 WLWB41