Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
|
08-22-2005, 14:40
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Hello Waderlodge people~
My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot coach too small? 2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your input is greatly appreciated! Christina in Oxnard, Ca |
|||
08-22-2005, 23:47
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
There are at least three BB close by here in Orange County. I'm sure each
of us will be more than happy to show you guys or BB's. Just ask. Kevin McKeown 1986 38' PT Curt Springer 1987 38' PT Jack Smith 70's something Gas (Sorry, Jack!) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
08-23-2005, 01:05
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Hello Christina:
Charolette and I had an '85 FC 35 for several years and the last 2 we were full timing. Though she was a good Coach, we soon realized that after full timing, we needed a pt40 for several reasons. More closet space and drawers and storage being the primary things. As you travel, even during the winter months, you can go from one season to the next in the space of a few days, and with a smaller Coach clothing space is limited. Oh there were other things as well but the PT's, for us, would make a better rig all around. Safe travels, Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm At 02:40 AM 8/23/2005 +0000, you wrote: >Hello Waderlodge people~ >My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so >we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided >this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 >questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot >coach too small? >2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting >us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 >gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your >input is greatly appreciated! >Christina in Oxnard, Ca > > > |
|||
08-23-2005, 02:22
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gone2k9z"
wrote: > Hello Waderlodge people~ > My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > coach too small? Howdy, Christina. We are fulltimers in a 1993 40' WL. Our first motorhome was a 38' Serengeti. I feel that fulltimers need all of the storage that can be had. When you are fulltiming you have to carry all of your stuff with you. feels? Regards, Liz Regards, Jack and Liz Pearce Fulltiming in a 1993 Wanderlodge WB40 Homesick Texans in SE. FL |
|||
08-23-2005, 02:34
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
I agree with what Ralph said about size; I have had a 40 since 1987 (same
coach) and find it a reasonable size although we never full-timed. I ;am looking seriously at a 42" model and if I purchase it, this 40 will be on market. It is an exceptional coach with 120K and a engine with only 50K+- Detroit 6 turbo. Watch for it on Vintage Bird. Wallace Craig 85 40 PT Azle, Texas 817 221-2404 gone2k9z Hello Waderlodge people~ My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot coach too small? 2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your input is greatly appreciated! Christina in Oxnard, Ca SPONSORED LINKS Recreational vehicles Wanderlodge Automotive maintenance Recreational vehicle dealer Used recreational vehicles Automotive radiators --------------------------------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "WanderlodgeForum" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
08-23-2005, 02:34
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Christina
You are welcome to visit our 1987 PT38. It's the model with the walk thru bath. 714 998-6187 or 714 269-6187 cell. Where was the 1974 coach located that you looked at? Earlier this year I sold a 1974 to a lady in Culver City and she has it up for sale. Curt Sprenger 1987 PT38, Anaheim Hills, Calif. gone2k9z wrote: > Hello Waderlodge people~ > My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > coach too small? > 2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting > us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 > gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your > input is greatly appreciated! > Christina in Oxnard, Ca > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "WanderlodgeForum > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum>" on the web. > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > |
|||
08-23-2005, 05:41
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Christina,
In respone to you first question, here is a past post from a very knowlegeable source, Jeff Miller: (it's a bit long and covers a lot of ground) Okay, one at a time: > Is the top end governed at approx 64 MPH? -- No. The engine is governed to approx. 2650-2800 full load originally, this should be 65-70mph on a turbo (theoretically, but...). It is really governed by power/weight, and by the lack of available intake air, which can be improved somewhat. Only the 300hp and early N.A. are really governed by max. RPM as their power/weight ratio is better. > What approx miles per gallon could I expect - around 8? -- 8 would be good on an '83 FC35. Could easily be 7.5 if you have a heavy foot. > Does the 250 cat climb grades "well" on the FC35? -- In a word, no. It will climb, and a well maintained diesel will run at full load all day without hurting it (such as long climbs). Depending on the grade and the coach I'm told that some FCs have trouble holding 40mph on a long climb. On the other hand, unless you live in mountains and drive there constantly, it really doesn't make a significant difference in your overall trip time to spend an extra 4-5minutes climbing a grade at 40mph. The turbo will help to maintain full power, and you'll get there safely with that heavy coach even in strong winds. The hill retarder also helps a good deal to make the descent safer and save your brakes. > Is this model ok for total weight, front and rear axle weights, pulling a light compact toad with full fluids etc? -- BlueBird tended toward overkill here, you should have a decent amount of capacity front and rear. Mine can carry more weight than most coaches are rated to tow. > I am very safety conscience about staying within safe design loads. Does anyone know the wheelbase in ft and/or inches? -- Don't get too sucked into the wheelbase/length ratio, it doesn't mean squat when you get into a 35,000lb coach. For the record, the 35FC is 216.5" wheelbase, with a 35.1' (curb) turning radius which makes it manuver better than a 29' class C. The wheelbase is approx. 51.5%, which some consider important for handling characteristics, but you only have to drive a "safe ratio" plastic disposable motorhome like a Winnebago (my good friend calls his the "Windybago" for its poor crosswind and truck wake characteristics) or other to see the massive difference. The strong truck frame/suspension/tires coupled with the sturdy steel body and generous radii to spill air over the top, coupled with the balance of overhang front/rear, throw it into a whole different catagory for windy day performance and handling safety. Drive each on a windy day and find out. This does require the steering and tires to be maintained well BTW. I also am a safety freak, this is why I bought BlueBird. > Is there a safe built into these models? -- Generally, yes. I haven't seen one without, but don't know that it was standard. Christina-this is most relevant to your question ----> Q) My use would be vacation use for 2 to 5 years, then full time. Any pros/cons to the 83 FC35 given this? I just am not sure yet of the pro/con to PT vs FC. A) The FC is less expensive to buy and maintain, it is also more manuverable which is an advantage if you go to races, events, or even state campgrounds. It also generally gets better fuel mileage. The advantage to the PT is the quiet drive of the rear engine, additional power, and especially in the PT40 there is much more basement storage and inside space. More size/space costs more money, that's all. I love my FC for going to campgrounds, the beach, and even to July4 fireworks because I can easily negotiate traffic. For long hauls and long stays I'd prefer a 40' widebody. - Jeff Miller Jim Owens 77 FC33SB (Gas) Lake of the Ozarks, MO --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gone2k9z" wrote: > Hello Waderlodge people~ > My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > coach too small? > 2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting > us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 > gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your > input is greatly appreciated! > Christina in Oxnard, Ca |
|||
08-24-2005, 04:43
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Good morning, Liz!
Thanks for your reponse to my post. Great idea about renting for a week...would love to do that if we both had time off at the same time! Perhaps next year?? We've been weighing all of the options....there are so many choices to be made! We were tending towards a 40', but want to be able to get into the national parks. We won't have much 'stuff' by the time we hit the road, just the 2 of us and our pooches and clothes & cooking stuff. As long as I have my knitting needles and some leashes, I'm happy! When is your surgery? Soon, no? I'll be thinking about you. Take care, Christina Corpus (Oxnard, Ca) --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jack and Liz Pearce" > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gone2k9z" > wrote: > > Hello Waderlodge people~ > > My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > > we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > > this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > > questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > > coach too small? > > > > Howdy, Christina. > We are fulltimers in a 1993 40' WL. Our first motorhome was a 38' > Serengeti. I feel that fulltimers need all of the storage that can be > had. When you are fulltiming you have to carry all of your stuff with > you. > feels? > > Regards, > Liz > Regards, > Jack and Liz Pearce > Fulltiming in a 1993 Wanderlodge WB40 > Homesick Texans in SE. FL |
|||
08-24-2005, 04:50
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Good morning, Ralph!
Thanks for your help-there are sooooo many things to consider! We have a checklist, but it would be so much easier if there was one lenghth, one motor, one floorplan, and one color from which to choose! Hope to see you on the road someday soon! Take care, Christina Corpus (Oxnard, Ca) --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph L. Fullenwider" > Hello Christina: > > Charolette and I had an '85 FC 35 for several years and the last 2 we were > full timing. Though she was a good Coach, we soon realized that after full > timing, we needed a pt40 for several reasons. More closet space and drawers > and storage being the primary things. As you travel, even during the winter > months, you can go from one season to the next in the space of a few days, > and with a smaller Coach clothing space is limited. Oh there were other > things as well but the PT's, for us, would make a better rig all around. > > Safe travels, > > Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider > Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma > http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm > > At 02:40 AM 8/23/2005 +0000, you wrote: > >Hello Waderlodge people~ > >My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > >we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > >this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > >questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > >coach too small? > >2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting > >us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 > >gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your > >input is greatly appreciated! > >Christina in Oxnard, Ca > > > > > > |
|||
08-24-2005, 04:56
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
Wanderlogdge wannabee fulltimers...
Good morning, Wallace! WOW! A 42'er? Sounds great!
So, you're going to list your '85 on the Vintage Bird site? Any chance you're asking under $40K??? Thanks for your help...there are so many things to consider, my husband is totally into all of the mechanics of the coach, and I'm looking at color and bed arrangements! Hope to see you in your new coach when we hit the road! How soon are you going to list your BB? Can you email us some more info & maybe a few pictures? Thanks! Christina Corpus, (Oxnard, Ca) --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Wallace Craig > I agree with what Ralph said about size; I have had a 40 since 1987 (same coach) and find it a reasonable size although we never full-timed. I ;am looking seriously at a 42" model and if I purchase it, this 40 will be on market. It is an exceptional coach with 120K and a engine > with only 50K+- Detroit 6 turbo. Watch for it on Vintage Bird. > Wallace Craig > 85 40 PT > Azle, Texas > 817 221-2404 > gone2k9z > Hello Waderlodge people~ > My husband & I are hoping to become fulltimers when we retire, so > we're doing a lot of research on the Wanderlodge as we have decided > this is "the only way to fly" (pardons to Mr. Magoo)...I have 2 > questions right now: 1. For you fulltimers out there, is a 35 foot > coach too small? > 2. Are there any members in Southern Calif that wouldn't mind letting > us visit your Wanderlodge? We've only been inside one so far, a '74 > gas rig, lovely, but a bit small (31' for fulltiming we think. Your > input is greatly appreciated! > Christina in Oxnard, Ca > > > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Recreational vehicles Wanderlodge Automotive maintenance Recreational vehicle dealer Used recreational vehicles Automotive radiators > > --------------------------------- > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "WanderlodgeForum" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > --------------------------------- > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)