Hills vs Motorhome
|
04-24-2006, 13:09
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
Hills vs Motorhome
Gary,
Thanks for the info, that was exactly what I needed to know. I'm not looking for a hot rod, just something less stressful on both myself and the motorhome. The GMC is a great rig, but it was not designed to tow much weight. Thanks again, Jerry L'Ecuyer Anaheim, CA 1976 GMC (for now) ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Miller To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 5:26 AM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Hills vs Motorhome Jerry, The coach lengths you're considering will all have the CAT 3208. You'll want a turbo (critical altitude(point at which power loss begins)about 8200 feet) which was introduced in 1983, along with the Jacobs electric driveline retarder which is very effective at controlling the descents. My CAT is a 225 horsepower while the last few '83s had the 250. I pull a 5000 lb Montero and have had no troubles with the long mountain pulls. I am normally in the slow lane with the heavy trucks but don't get in their way as my speed is normally matched with them if not just a little faster. I've found however that even the empty trucks wanting to climb quickly don't have much concern for a slow vehicle on a mountain climb. It's expected, and if you stop and think about it, only lasts a few minutes before there's a pullout to let folks pass. If you buy an '88 or later you'll have the 300 horse 3208 ATAAC which will do even better. I'm not as fond of the built in retarder in the ZF transmission which was matched to the ATAAC however as it tends to heat up the transmission quickly. Descending hills is much better with the Jacobs electric retarder and a downshift of the Allison 4 speed. Good Luck, Gary Miller 83 FC 33 Milwaukee area --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, <minds@...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am a proud owner of a 1976 GMC coach . but my style of travel is starting to change. I tow a heavy FJ-40 Land Cruiser which is about 4200 pounds. I do ok on moderate hills but the coach feels the strain. It is hard to keep up with slow traffic and I cringe at the thought of long distant trips with hills. Most of my travels up to now have been close to home in California and with retirement closing in I am beginning to look for a more capable motor home. > > > > I was a school bus driver in my youth, so Bluebirds were very familiar. I'm looking to get info about the 33-36 foot single rear axel coach. What is their ability to handle the varying terrain of the West while towing and your opinion on what to avoid in my search for a capable coach? > > > > Thanks for any help > > > > Jerry L'Ecuyer > > Anaheim, CA > > 1976 GMC (for now) > > 1967 FJ-40 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS a.. Visit your group "WanderlodgeForum" on the web. b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Hills vs Motorhome - minds@...> - 04-23-2006, 16:08
Hills vs Motorhome - Gary Miller - 04-24-2006, 00:26
Hills vs Motorhome - minds@...> - 04-24-2006 13:09
Hills vs Motorhome - Joe Hagan - 04-24-2006, 16:52
Hills vs Motorhome - minds@...> - 04-24-2006, 17:23
Hills vs Motorhome - Joe Hagan - 04-25-2006, 15:07
Hills vs Motorhome - minds@...> - 04-25-2006, 15:30
Hills vs Motorhome - Joe Hagan - 04-26-2006, 04:30
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)