Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
6v92 vs 8v92
09-06-2006, 10:34
Post: #9
6v92 vs 8v92
Sorry, I don't know but I can say that on cruise control it rarely loses speed
going up a hill.
Dan
88 38 8v
----- Original Message -----
From: djlcanuck
To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:40 PM
Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92


--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Dan"
wrote:
>
So with 475hp what speed do you climb a 8% grade?
Thanks
Doug Long
Edmonton
Wanabee

> Hey Ron, My 38' 8v weighs 41460 with full fuel and has 475hp so
that is 1hp for every 87lbs. Just curious what is the ratio on your
coach. It should be good for a 36pt.
> Dan Cen Miss
> 88 38 8v
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ron Faubion
> To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:21 AM
> Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6v92 vs 8v92
>
>
> Sounds like a Detroit Diesel.
>
> I understand the 8V's have more coach to push, making
> it doubtful you'd get a great deal more uphill speed,
> and they both have about the same great fuel milage
> stats. I climbed 7400 feet this weekend and yep, it's
> 35, 40, and 45 MPH, (that's where I turn my emergency
> flashers off). It's OK, you get used to it, but when
> a gasser Southwind passes ya, it's a little
> embarrassing. Still you had so much more comfort and
> enjoyment while parked than that dude.
>
> Ron, No. California
> 85PT36 w/6V
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date:
9/4/2006
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.0/439 - Release Date: 9/6/2006


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
6v92 vs 8v92 - djlcanuck - 09-05-2006, 12:45
6v92 vs 8v92 - mbulriss - 09-05-2006, 15:20
6v92 vs 8v92 - Ron Faubion - 09-05-2006, 17:21
6v92 vs 8v92 - Dan - 09-05-2006, 17:34
6v92 vs 8v92 - Ron Faubion - 09-06-2006, 08:18
6v92 vs 8v92 - Ron Faubion - 09-06-2006, 08:18
6v92 vs 8v92 - djlcanuck - 09-06-2006, 08:40
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 09-06-2006, 08:41
6v92 vs 8v92 - Dan - 09-06-2006 10:34
6v92 vs 8v92 - Leroy Eckert - 09-06-2006, 10:41
6v92 vs 8v92 - Mike Hohnstein - 09-06-2006, 14:54
6v92 vs 8v92 - djlcanuck - 09-06-2006, 15:34
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 09-06-2006, 20:30
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 09-07-2006, 07:59
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 09-07-2006, 10:15
6v92 vs 8v92 - Curt Sprenger - 09-07-2006, 11:20
6v92 vs 8v92 - Curt Sprenger - 09-08-2006, 01:37
6v92 vs 8v92 - Curt Sprenger - 09-08-2006, 02:15
6v92 vs 8v92 - Curt Sprenger - 09-08-2006, 12:54
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 04-17-2007, 09:04
6v92 vs 8v92 - erniecarpet@... - 04-17-2007, 10:48
6v92 vs 8v92 - Ryan Wright - 04-17-2007, 12:16
6v92 vs 8v92 - Curt Sprenger - 04-17-2007, 13:40
6v92 vs 8v92 - brad barton - 04-17-2007, 14:29
6v92 vs 8v92 - Stephen Birtles - 04-18-2007, 00:22



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)