Supplemental breaking systems

[Gardner Yeaw]

Bob,
I installed an SMI system in my Jeep. I liked it because it
required only one modification to the jeep which was to install a one-
way valve and a tee in the vacuume line, and no changes to the coach.
I have taken several short trips with steep hills and it seems to
work fine.

The difference between the M&G and the SMI function is that the
M&G applies the brakes whenever the coach brakes are applied
proportional to the brake air preasure, while the SMI uses an
inertial measurement system and only applies the brakes when you are
really trying to slow down quickly (it is adjustable for
sensativity). The theory is that the brakes only need to be applied
in heavy stopping situatuins and not when just slowing or controling
speed on a hill.

I also purchased the breakaway feature so if the toad gets loose it
will put on the brakes.

I think the toad brakes will last much longer this way and since
the Jeep is a fraction of the coach weight I doubt it will
significantly effect the life of the coach brakes. Setup is simple,
turn it on. (and connect the breakaway cable to the coach if
installed)


Gardner
78FC33
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Lawrence"
wrote:
>
> Hi group,
> We have a new Honda Element that we will be towig when we fulltime
out
> of here in Tacoma in Oce 07.
>
> What supplemental systems are you guys running?
>
> I see lots of states that require such a system if over 3,000 lbs.
The
> Element weighs 3,500 lbs.
>
> Canada is fine as limit is 4,000lbs, but worry about here in states.
> If I get in an accident, I'm sure the insurance co. will look for
any
> excuse to deny the coverage.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Lawrence
> 84 PT36
> Tacoma, Wa.
>