heat/sound insulation comparison
|
10-22-2006, 07:54
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
heat/sound insulation comparison
---RALPH:
Thanks nfor your valued comments. It is a slow Sunday morning in Vegas so I can Chat a little more. The bucket of "lizard skin" I put on the FC was more expensive than two sheets of the lead stuff at the Marine store.. two sheets about $210 one bucket about $250 I now regret I did not have a DB meter to test the ..before ..and ..after sound..........but it sure seemed much better to me in heat AND sound.....trouble with the FC, it seemed like all the sound after applying the "lizard" seemed to come from the front........NOT from the doghouse...... I truly believe application helped both.... One more thing...I see "lizard skin" sells a bucket of heat proof stuff and a bucket of soundproof stuff.....ok to say stuff...no need to sound fancey right? Anyway, when I return from Australia next May, I am going to apply BOTH buckets SOUND & HEAT...and I will try to do a db sound analysis of BEFORE and AFTER ....then I will be able to report to the Forum with actual on the job results...until then gang...all we can do is..get along and talk about it...... Anyone want to come to Australia? We have a small house and are willing to talk with any Forum member who wants to come to Melbourne as we would be willing to put you all up for a week or so to get you started on your tour..no charge....u can email me privately...we can pick you up at the Melbourne airport..we live in a small town of 4000 people about 100 klicks from Melbourne...Australia is a must place to see before going to the box! LOL Hank Hannigan 90SP36...we r keeping it 80FC31 for sale now in VEGAS In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph L. Fullenwider" > > Good Sunday to everyone: > > While a spirited exchange of information tends to further knowledge of up > grades and parts, this is one side I will attempt to expound on, but not > with the db ratings or density factors, I do not have that information and > it is superfluous really, in an after the fact sort of way. > > What I would like to send out is the experience of use and quality of sound > and heat insulation, having re done several dog houses and gen sets. > > 1. Original wafered or honey comb foam insulation with barrier. > a. No question, the sound deadening quality it the best. that is a plus > b. Installation ease, comparable > c. Down side, does not resist oil impregnation nor the effects of heat > deterioration, which is the reason for replacement in the first place. Will > have to repeat installation in 5 to 7 years. ( that is an estimate only) > > 2. Foam with sound barrier with mylar and self sticking back ( such as > Steven Birtles offers) > a. Sound deadening quality is acceptable in most cases, though certainly > not as good as the wafered foam. > b. Mylar facing does resist oil and heat added to a good sound deadening > with the barrier. > c. installation is comparable but not much room for placement error. > Once stuck you don't move it. Also sealed with either mylar tape or the > meatal a/c and heating ducting type ( best) > > 3. Foam with sound barrier and mylar, (such as from JC Whitney) > a. Sound quality as 2 above > b. Mylar facing, the same as 2 above > c. Installation has one more step with using a spray adhesive on both > surfaces, allowed to dry to tacky then placement. This is where 2 and 3 > differ. There is room for placement error as the spray adhesive allows for > slight movement after placement. > > All three above need to have screws and washers added to the overhead in > the gen set compartments to help hold it in place because of the weight of > the materials used. > > I did not mention the Lizzard skin material in the above because I have > never used it, but Hank has had it done and knowing Hank and his experience > in Bird's, I trust his experience. > > Also I did not mention the cost factor, this is something each individual > must research on his own. As does the material that is going to be used to > do the job. I have used 1,2 and 3 above and my personal preference is the > mylar faced material coupled with the ability to seal all the seams to > repel weather, heat and noise. Certainly there are compromises that need to > be addressed. Again that is on the individual to think about when picking > materials. > > Hope this helps a little, and the above is what experience has taught me. > > Safe travels, > > Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider > Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
heat/sound insulation comparison - erniecarpet@... - 10-22-2006, 03:06
heat/sound insulation comparison - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 10-22-2006, 06:26
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-22-2006, 07:44
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-22-2006 07:54
heat/sound insulation comparison - Leroy Eckert - 10-22-2006, 08:48
heat/sound insulation comparison - Dan Darst - 10-22-2006, 09:39
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-22-2006, 10:27
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-22-2006, 13:28
heat/sound insulation comparison - pattypape - 10-23-2006, 00:58
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-23-2006, 01:44
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-23-2006, 07:26
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)