Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
heat/sound insulation comparison
10-22-2006, 07:54
Post: #4
heat/sound insulation comparison
---RALPH:
Thanks nfor your valued comments. It is a slow Sunday morning in
Vegas so I can Chat a little more.

The bucket of "lizard skin" I put on the FC was more expensive than
two sheets of the lead stuff at the Marine store..
two sheets about $210
one bucket about $250

I now regret I did not have a DB meter to test
the ..before ..and ..after sound..........but it sure seemed much
better to me in heat AND sound.....trouble with the FC, it seemed
like all the sound after applying the "lizard" seemed to come from
the front........NOT from the doghouse......
I truly believe application helped both....
One more thing...I see "lizard skin" sells a bucket of heat proof
stuff and a bucket of soundproof stuff.....ok to say stuff...no
need to sound fancey right?

Anyway, when I return from Australia next May, I am going to apply
BOTH buckets SOUND & HEAT...and I will try to do a db sound analysis
of BEFORE and AFTER ....then I will be able to report to the Forum
with actual on the job results...until then gang...all we can do
is..get along and talk about it......
Anyone want to come to Australia? We have a small house and are
willing to talk with any Forum member who wants to come to Melbourne
as we would be willing to put you all up for a week or so to get you
started on your tour..no charge....u can email me privately...we can
pick you up at the Melbourne airport..we live in a small town of
4000 people about 100 klicks from Melbourne...Australia is a must
place to see before going to the box!

LOL
Hank Hannigan
90SP36...we r keeping it
80FC31 for sale now in VEGAS

In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph L. Fullenwider"
wrote:
>
> Good Sunday to everyone:
>
> While a spirited exchange of information tends to further
knowledge of up
> grades and parts, this is one side I will attempt to expound on,
but not
> with the db ratings or density factors, I do not have that
information and
> it is superfluous really, in an after the fact sort of way.
>
> What I would like to send out is the experience of use and quality
of sound
> and heat insulation, having re done several dog houses and gen
sets.
>
> 1. Original wafered or honey comb foam insulation with barrier.
> a. No question, the sound deadening quality it the best. that
is a plus
> b. Installation ease, comparable
> c. Down side, does not resist oil impregnation nor the effects
of heat
> deterioration, which is the reason for replacement in the first
place. Will
> have to repeat installation in 5 to 7 years. ( that is an estimate
only)
>
> 2. Foam with sound barrier with mylar and self sticking back (
such as
> Steven Birtles offers)
> a. Sound deadening quality is acceptable in most cases, though
certainly
> not as good as the wafered foam.
> b. Mylar facing does resist oil and heat added to a good sound
deadening
> with the barrier.
> c. installation is comparable but not much room for placement
error.
> Once stuck you don't move it. Also sealed with either mylar tape
or the
> meatal a/c and heating ducting type ( best)
>
> 3. Foam with sound barrier and mylar, (such as from JC Whitney)
> a. Sound quality as 2 above
> b. Mylar facing, the same as 2 above
> c. Installation has one more step with using a spray adhesive
on both
> surfaces, allowed to dry to tacky then placement. This is where 2
and 3
> differ. There is room for placement error as the spray adhesive
allows for
> slight movement after placement.
>
> All three above need to have screws and washers added to the
overhead in
> the gen set compartments to help hold it in place because of the
weight of
> the materials used.
>
> I did not mention the Lizzard skin material in the above because I
have
> never used it, but Hank has had it done and knowing Hank and his
experience
> in Bird's, I trust his experience.
>
> Also I did not mention the cost factor, this is something each
individual
> must research on his own. As does the material that is going to be
used to
> do the job. I have used 1,2 and 3 above and my personal preference
is the
> mylar faced material coupled with the ability to seal all the
seams to
> repel weather, heat and noise. Certainly there are compromises
that need to
> be addressed. Again that is on the individual to think about when
picking
> materials.
>
> Hope this helps a little, and the above is what experience has
taught me.
>
> Safe travels,
>
> Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider
> Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma
>
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
heat/sound insulation comparison - erniecarpet@... - 10-22-2006, 03:06
heat/sound insulation comparison - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 10-22-2006, 06:26
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-22-2006, 07:44
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-22-2006 07:54
heat/sound insulation comparison - Leroy Eckert - 10-22-2006, 08:48
heat/sound insulation comparison - Dan Darst - 10-22-2006, 09:39
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-22-2006, 10:27
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-22-2006, 13:28
heat/sound insulation comparison - pattypape - 10-23-2006, 00:58
heat/sound insulation comparison - Henry Jay Hannigan - 10-23-2006, 01:44
heat/sound insulation comparison - dspithaler@... - 10-23-2006, 07:26



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)