Super Low Sulphur Diesel and Cat engines???
|
10-27-2006, 01:37
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
Super Low Sulphur Diesel and Cat engines???
Tom, I wonder if the Havoc some purport to exist by using ATF is the
impact on the sale of their additive. I use ATF 4 quarts per 100 gal on every other tank on my dump truck Cummins N-14 330,000 miles. 1qt every other tank in 97 Dodge Cummins 195,000 miles. It may well be that I always used it and the seals never dried out to the point that rewetting them would tear them up (as they unevenly swell back to shape). I always also used ATF to clean the injectors by putting 30% in the filter when changed. I think the worse thing you can do to seals and bearings on an older engine is to use a spray degreaser and pressure washer on the surface. I bet the diesel thing will play out as problems develop and I also think 'long term unused powerplants'( like RV engines) will have unique problems. JeffM once pointed out that time is a factor in product failure. With this new factor Time will tell. Tom, why can't you simply add sulfur? I buy 'Corn flakes' because its better for you than 'Frosted Flakes'. with two spoons of an additive I get a healthy cereal and something good to eat while I read the dietary label. GregoryO'Connor 94ptRomoland --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Tom Warner wrote: > > Rob good idea of putting the ATF in your diesel fuel. But be sure to > set aside some money for maintenance right after. You might want to > go to the Chevron or other fuel producers site and read what you can > and cant do. ATF just plays havoc with some seals. > > PS: To save everyone some stress you might want to check the diesel > stops and find out that they still all sell regular diesel > fuel. http://www.flyingj.com/highway/locations/us-map.html > For instance in Georgia: only one station today has ULSD but they > all have low sulphur diesel which you have been burning for a long > time. In Florida as of today no Flying J stations have ULSD but all > of them have low sulphur. Everyone does not expect a government > mandate to go perfectly do you > available for quite some time for older diesels. > > > tom warner > vernon center,ny > 1985 Bluebird PT 40 > > At 10:26 PM 10/26/2006, you wrote: > >Rob, Thanks for the input. The ATF will help with lubricity, but I > >don't know that it alone will compensate for the new diesel formula. > >If that's your plan, put it in now, becasue you're already running > >ULSD, it was a federally mandated change that took effect August 1st. > > Doug > > > >Rob Robinson > > When I start to use that Ultra Low Sulphur I'm throwing > > in ATF with each > >fillup. I think someone said that two quarts per 300 gallons of fuel should > >do it. > > > >On 26/10/06, doug_ngl > > > > > > Howdy again, Thanks for the help with my locked safe issue. Now I know > > > you just stand back and throw 450.00 at it and it will open. > > > Now on to my next question/topic. I own and operate a gas > > > station/tire store in Gunnison Colorado and have been talking to > > > various fuel suppliers and addative distributors about ultra low > > > sulphur diesel and winterizing this fuel. Most are saying that due to > > > the differences in the chemical makeup, getting this fuel to reach a > > > CFPP lower than -25 to -30F is going to be a problem (at lesat in > > > Gunnison it will be). Availibility of #1 diesel to thin it is supposed > > > to be a problem this winter as well, not to mention that this approach > > > apparently no longer has the same favorable effect that it used to. > > > So today while talking to a new rep, he mentioned the low lubricity > > > of the ULSD and the problems older diesel engines, Cats were noted, > > > have running this stuff. He noted injector pump failure specifically. > > > Anyone have any input or experience they can share? Thanks gang, Doug > > > Engel in Gunnison, Co. '81 FC35SB > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Rob, Sue & Merlin Robinson > >94 WLWB > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)