very On-Topic: the question of the archives
|
04-21-2005, 10:41
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
very On-Topic: the question of the archives
I just read the announcement about the thousands of archives and posts being
lost to Ernie's new free Wanderlodge forum and accessible only via Bruce's new pay/profit forum. I am not trying to start another long "OT" thread or a "range war," but this concerns the very heart of the the "on-topic" discussions of this forum--its rich store of technical archives. Ernie, I realize that on this subject, you wrote me the following some days ago: "What I had in mind was that instead of sending someone packing when they ask a question- to go look it up- to have folks get back to the old way we did stuff-- we all jumped in and answered them." I really respect what you're saying, Ernie, and that's the way your new forum is wonderfully operating, but I am also thinking about all the valuable, multi-page, mini-technical treatises that the expert contributers have submitted over the past 4 years--many in answer to what seemed like simple questions, but turned out to be a lot more involved. Please see Jeff Miller's elegant statements on this below. I would strongly urge anyone considering joining the pay/profit Wanderlodge site to withhold your minimum $20 dues until the question of the old Yahoo archives is settled fairly. Those archives should be the property of both Bruce's new pay/profit forum and Ernie's new free forum for the following eloquent reasons, as explained by Jeff Miller: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Miller" <synrgdsl@...> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:26 PM Subject: [Wanderlodge] Archives and permissions > I know very little about copyright law, it shares real-estate with > the patent office but I somehow never had much interest in that area > of law. It does seem to me from what little I have read however that > postings and submissions to this website remain the property of the > author, and any use of such would require permission of the > author/owner. This is apparently also an area that is currently > developing in case law, ... However if these submissions were > harvested and their access limited, this would not fit the intended > purpose of these submissions. If free access remains, I don't see > where anyone would raise a legal issue. > > In any event, it seems that since I and many others have spent > hundreds (thousands, but don't tell my wife) of hours reading, > researching, and submitting to this forum with the purpose of helping > other BlueBird Wanderlodge owners freely, and in good faith, that > this information would remain the property of its authors and the > collective membership which has created it. This would in my opinion > mean that Bruce and Ernie will likely both have complete access to > the archives and past postings in our behalf. Again, I ask anyone considering paying the dues for the pay/profit forum to withhold your dues until this is guaranteed settled fairly and confirmed to us by the leadership of Ernie's free forum. Jo-Ski "The Bird Abides" '83-FC 35 RB Blaine, WA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Wanderlodge/ is being closed by > >the "offical yahoo site owner", and turned into a pay required site, > >on a automatic link redirect of the previous main link of > >http://www.wanderlodge.org . All the thousands of previous > >contributer/member posts, files, and links will be lost from the yahoo > >free site, onto to the new pay/profit site. > > > >Several new free sites on yahoo have been opened to counteract this > >seizure of posts and links. A search on "wanderlodge" will locate the > >new free sites for Wanderlodge owners and potential owners. Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/ b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Jo-Ski - 04-21-2005 10:41
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Mike Hohnstein - 04-21-2005, 12:22
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Jeff Miller - 04-21-2005, 16:15
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Jo-Ski - 04-21-2005, 16:44
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Jeff Miller - 04-21-2005, 16:57
very On-Topic: the question of the archives - Dan Weaver - 04-22-2005, 02:39
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)