Two questions: CCC on a 89, 36SP and Painting cabinets

[Leroy Eckert]

Yes, didn't see that!

Leroy Eckert
1990 WB-40 "Smoke N Mirrors"
Niceville, FL


----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory OConnor
To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Two questions: CCC on a 89, 36SP and Painting
cabinets


If you looked at Newell, Foretravel or Monaco and think they are
comparable to Blue bird, I suspect that you would probably be
satisfied with brush painting the laminates.

GregoryO'Connor
94ptRomolandCa

yahoogroups.com, "eujamfh" <mfhopson@...> wrote:
>
> Regardless of the coach (be it a BB, Newell, CC, Foretravel or high
> end Monaco) whatever we end up with will be weighed before I sign
the
> check over. Same for an oil analysis. I really, really have a spot
> in my heart for the older BB and Newells...but there is
a "practicle"
> side that talks about getting a mid-90's (with the cummins 300/400)
> CC, Foretravel or Monaco (just their higher end units).
>
> The funny thing (and it really is not funny from my chair) is all
the
> "potential coahces" that I am interested in....are no where near
> Northern Virginia. ANd when I was stationed on the West
coast...just
> the opposite was true.
>
> BTW - we sold a class C, Xplorer 27ft on a F-550 with the PSD and
4x4
> this past summer. Great rig - but with twins, and two labs...and
> liking the national parks (i.e. dry camping) and the fact we use it
> for traveling to see relatives in New York and Minnisota...we are
> looking at something with larger tanks. Course all the above class
As
> fit the bill...
>
> I am curious how close the 36SPs are on weight...
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> P.S. - As always, thank you for taking the time to post a
> response...the more I know, the better prepared I am to pull the
> trigger when the right "deal" comes my way...
>
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hohnstein"
> <MHOHNSTEIN@> wrote:
> >
> > Don't be too happy about the triple C on SPs. Weigh carefully.
> PTs have a tag for a reason.
> > MH
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]