Two questions: CCC on a 89, 36SP and Painting cabinets

[Gregory OConnor]

Troy, when you are sitting in the home bleachers with a winnning team
you dont have to brag about your players. If you cant see the
difference it doesnt matter.

GregoryO'Connor
self proclaimed expert
94ptRomoland Ca

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Troy Tikalsky"
wrote:
>
> How many Newell, Fortravel and Monaco's have you owned? Oh wait
you LOOKED at some so you are now a self-proclaimed expert!
>
> The Newell is just as good or better than the Blue Bird in all
aspects.
>
> Having owned both and doing my own maintenance I am happy to set
you straight. Lets have your list of the better qualities of the
Blue Bird compared to the Newell.
>
> Troy Tikalsky
> 1983 Blue Bird FC33SB CAT 3208T
> 1986 Newell WB40 DD8V92
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gregory OConnor
> To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:55 PM
> Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Two questions: CCC on a 89, 36SP
and Painting cabinets
>
>
> If you looked at Newell, Foretravel or Monaco and think they are
> comparable to Blue bird, I suspect that you would probably be
> satisfied with brush painting the laminates.
>
> GregoryO'Connor
> 94ptRomolandCa
>
> yahoogroups.com, "eujamfh" <mfhopson@> wrote:
> >
> > Regardless of the coach (be it a BB, Newell, CC, Foretravel or
high
> > end Monaco) whatever we end up with will be weighed before I
sign
> the
> > check over. Same for an oil analysis. I really, really have a
spot
> > in my heart for the older BB and Newells...but there is
> a "practicle"
> > side that talks about getting a mid-90's (with the cummins
300/400)
> > CC, Foretravel or Monaco (just their higher end units).
> >
> > The funny thing (and it really is not funny from my chair) is
all
> the
> > "potential coahces" that I am interested in....are no where near
> > Northern Virginia. ANd when I was stationed on the West
> coast...just
> > the opposite was true.
> >
> > BTW - we sold a class C, Xplorer 27ft on a F-550 with the PSD
and
> 4x4
> > this past summer. Great rig - but with twins, and two labs...and
> > liking the national parks (i.e. dry camping) and the fact we
use it
> > for traveling to see relatives in New York and Minnisota...we
are
> > looking at something with larger tanks. Course all the above
class
> As
> > fit the bill...
> >
> > I am curious how close the 36SPs are on weight...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Matt
> >
> > P.S. - As always, thank you for taking the time to post a
> > response...the more I know, the better prepared I am to pull the
> > trigger when the right "deal" comes my way...
> >
> >
> > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hohnstein"
> > <MHOHNSTEIN@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't be too happy about the triple C on SPs. Weigh
carefully.
> > PTs have a tag for a reason.
> > > MH
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>