To buy or not part II

[Jeff August]

RW
We have a rear bath and love it, the bath is larger and you are right
about it being much more open inside. With a 33 foot it looks like all
you really lose is some kitchen counter space and the counter next to
the couches and one overhead storage box on each side. We like the twin
beds as well because the corner fullsize just is to small for both of
us and the dog. There are some good things about a side bath as well,
it splits the coach into living sections or areas. You can't go wrong
with eather one, just know whatever you buy there will be unexpected
issues.
Good Luck
Michelle & Jeff August
1980FC35RB
Plymouth Wi.

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "littlehouseonprairie1"
<murphy4@...> wrote:
>
> Man, what terrific feedback! Much appreciated. My observation of the
> 33FC with rear bath is that it is more wide-open than the side bath
> (making it feel bigger), providing good (but seperate) sleep
> arrangements for 2, and adequate sleep arrangements for 4. The twin
> couches and booth also provide adequate seating for 4. The 33 does
> have limited floor space... basically an aisle, which might get a
> little tight for extended time inside, and limited storage. The
> trade-off appears to be good fuel economy and excellent
maneuverability.
> having grown up traveling the country with my folks and sis in a 16'
> Shasta in the 60's, the 33 feels like a palace to me. Go's to show
> how times change. Overall though, I'm rethinking the size issue more
> carefully at this point. Thanks to everyone for your advice.
>
> RW in Central Illinois
>