Tire age vs wear
|
09-30-2007, 13:18
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
Tire age vs wear
I have Alcoa rims and tubeless tires. The external sidewalls showed no signs of
checking or cracks. The tread was excellent. I decided to change them anyway because of age from Michelin to Sumitomo(No brand preference, just cost was considered). I was amazed at what I saw when the old tires were removed. The sidewalls were toast. I could bend them with my bare hands. I now have a schedule to change tires every 5 years needed or not. A single blown tires can cost you thousands, torn up undercarriage, hoses and possibly yours or someone else's life. It's only money. Is it Michelin that says "Your life is riding on your tires"? Whom ever it is is correct. Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" Niceville, FL Royale Conversion ----- Original Message ----- From: bubblerboy64 To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 7:29 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Tire age vs wear Leroy, When you say "inside" you are referring to the part of the tire in which the tube would be in contact (if you in fact had tubed tires)? If you stripped the tires off the wheels and the insides looked good would you use them or is that a stupid question? The reason I ask is that I was ready to replace my ten year old tires and the tire dealership told me I didn't need to replace them because they showed absolutely no signs of weather deterioration.(He didn't look inside obviously). Now I am questioning his judgment. Hard to spring for tires when the TIRE DEALER says they are not needed. Old rubber is old rubber is old rubber is what I am reading to be the prevailing wisdom? I don't want to wast money but I feel this is pretty important. I guess what I am asking is if anyone supports the opinion of this particular tire dealer speak up. I assumed the fellow to be just exceptionally honest. Maybe he is just wrong? John Heckman central Pa 1973 FC > > My drive tires and tag tires were roughly 10 years old one year ago with no visual evidence of any significant problems. When the tires were removed the side walls looked like cottage cheese in particular the inside wall of the duals. They were ready to go at anytime. fwiw. > Leroy Eckert > 1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors" > Niceville, FL > Royale Conversion > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Forman > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:48 PM > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Tire age vs wear > > > The tires on my tag axle are very old, made in 1994 according to the > guy at the tire shop. However, they show zero signs of problem as far > as cracking or anything else. Should I throw them out solely based > upon the age, or should I just keep an eye on them like any other tire? > > Scott Forman > 86 PT38 > Memphis > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Tire age vs wear - Scott Forman - 09-30-2007, 06:48
Tire age vs wear - Curt Sprenger - 09-30-2007, 07:10
Tire age vs wear - Rob Robinson - 09-30-2007, 09:27
Tire age vs wear - Leroy Eckert - 09-30-2007, 09:39
Tire age vs wear - Ryan Wright - 09-30-2007, 12:14
Tire age vs wear - bubblerboy64 - 09-30-2007, 12:29
Tire age vs wear - Leroy Eckert - 09-30-2007 13:18
Tire age vs wear - Pete Masterson - 09-30-2007, 13:21
Tire age vs wear - Curt Sprenger - 09-30-2007, 13:33
Tire age vs wear - Gregory OConnor - 09-30-2007, 15:41
Tire age vs wear - Jon - 09-30-2007, 16:33
Tire age vs wear - bubblerboy64 - 09-30-2007, 23:59
Tire age vs wear - marvinskaggs@...> - 10-01-2007, 05:05
Tire age vs wear - bubblerboy64 - 10-02-2007, 01:53
Tire age vs wear - Leroy Eckert - 10-02-2007, 07:53
Tire age vs wear - ronmarabito2002 - 10-02-2007, 16:00
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)