Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LXI vs. WB's
02-13-2008, 11:19
Post: #6
LXI vs. WB's
I will stick with rivets. Most aircraft are built with one inch or less rivet spacing. There are many 50 year old examples out there in fine condition. My BB has three inch spacing. Yes there are composites out there, all subject to UV problems over time. No offense to newer units.

Leroy Eckert
1990 WB-40 Smoke N Mirrors
Dahlonega, GA
Royale Conversion

Pete Masterson wrote:
I have to admit that the Series 60 in my '95 was a major attraction. Nothing wrong with the DD 8v92, but it's been nearly 20 years since 8vs and 6vs have
been built. It's getting difficult to find experienced diesel mechanics who can work with them. Since the Series 60 is still in production -- and widely used -- there is little difficulty finding qualified mechanics.

FWIW, I've had no troubles with the engine and haven't needed any repairs on it -- just the usual preventive maintenance you'd expect.

When I had my coach weighed, I was a little surprised how heavy it was -- but it's still comfortably under the GVWR and no axle is close to being overloaded. I did, however, have to raise the tire pressures to keep the tires 'in spec' to somewhat above the recommended pressures on a plate found in one of the storage bays.

Some of the 'purists' might suggest that the coaches with rivets in their skin are "better" than the later, adhesive bonded models -- but I
wouldn't know how true that is. From an engineering perspective, adhesive bonding, if done correctly, gives a stronger connection with less concentrated stress on the connection points as is the case with rivets. But I can understand a concern that "glue" might not be as durable over time. (But I've never heard that anyone has had trouble with a 'bird in this regard.)
Pete Masterson
'95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42
El Sobrante CA
"aeonix1@mac.com"


On Feb 13, 2008, at 11:46 AM, brad barton wrote:

Bruce,
David Brady has been working with the front end of his LXi. Mine is not overloaded, but overbuilt. I don't think there is a better engine than the Series 60, but I like any Detroit. Mine has a standard non-slide bedroom without a rear closet, but the bed's a lot eaiser to get around. We have a full length closet on the front wall of the bedroom and 3 hall closets. Plenty of storage on board.

Brad Barton 00LXiDFW
"bbartonwx@hotmail.com"



To:
WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
From: birdshill123@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:21:33 +0000
Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] LXI vs. WB's

We are still looking at larger BB's. I have seen a few LXI's of the 98
vintage 41,s and 43,s for sale as well as a few 90 to 96 WB's. I
understand some of the differences such as the Detroit 60 and the
dropped engine for the rear closet. But I am interested in knowing some
of the possible problems with a 98. Is the 60 DD a good engine? Are
he 98's overloaded on the FA? I remeber reading something about some
BB's having this
problem. Any other things I should be aware of? Would
really appreciate some assistance.

Bruce
1988 FC35



Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.Get it now!




Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
LXI vs. WB's - birdshill123 - 02-13-2008, 07:21
LXI vs. WB's - brad barton - 02-13-2008, 07:46
LXI vs. WB's - Pete Masterson - 02-13-2008, 08:16
LXI vs. WB's - David Brady - 02-13-2008, 08:25
LXI vs. WB's - David Brady - 02-13-2008, 08:35
LXI vs. WB's - Leroy Eckert - 02-13-2008 11:19
LXI vs. WB's - David Brady - 02-13-2008, 12:19
LXI vs. WB's - Pete Masterson - 02-13-2008, 13:20
LXI vs. WB's - p_a_lazar - 02-13-2008, 14:18
LXI vs. WB's - Don Bradner - 02-13-2008, 14:26
LXI vs. WB's - David Brady - 02-13-2008, 15:16



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)