Question about repowering early PT's
|
06-06-2008, 17:10
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
Question about repowering early PT's
True, but they pollute, they're maintenance intensive, they're fuel hogs, they run backwards (maybe this is a feature), and they've been evolved to the limits of their engineering (o-ring cylinder sleeves, for example). They had a good run, now it's the 4-strokers turn. (Actually has been for many years). David '02 LXi, (I bought the engine, the bus came with it), NC brad barton wrote:
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Question about repowering early PT's - erniecarpet@... - 06-06-2008, 09:53
Question about repowering early PT's - Jonathan L - 06-06-2008, 12:11
Question about repowering early PT's - Leroy Eckert - 06-06-2008, 12:31
Question about repowering early PT's - Ryan Wright - 06-06-2008, 12:46
Question about repowering early PT's - Scott Forman - 06-06-2008, 13:43
Question about repowering early PT's - David Brady - 06-06-2008, 14:36
Question about repowering early PT's - brad barton - 06-06-2008, 14:49
Question about repowering early PT's - joepat50 - 06-06-2008, 16:40
Question about repowering early PT's - David Brady - 06-06-2008 17:10
Question about repowering early PT's - David Brady - 06-07-2008, 03:39
Question about repowering early PT's - Pete Masterson - 06-07-2008, 04:36
Question about repowering early PT's - Dan Carr - 06-09-2008, 03:35
Question about repowering early PT's - Dorn Hetzel - 06-09-2008, 05:12
Question about repowering early PT's - bubblerboy64 - 06-09-2008, 07:08
Question about repowering early PT's - Dorn Hetzel - 06-09-2008, 07:59
Question about repowering early PT's - bubblerboy64 - 06-09-2008, 09:04
Question about repowering early PT's - p_a_lazar - 06-09-2008, 09:29
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)