WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
|
06-22-2008, 05:28
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
Pete:
With your expert comments, it is probably time to close off this subject matter....what do you recommend Ernie? I will just continue being satisfied driving my corolla and Mitsubishi on "autogas" and we will all live "happily everafter...now that Naty & are are "happily" married like the rest of you. Just kidding.. I am already entered in the "SENIORS TOURNEY" at the WSOP on Monday here. Should be 3000 entries...sure hope I get LUCKY! I have enjoyed discussing "autogas." I apologize if I offended anyone. LOL Hank 90SP36 in Vegas --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Pete Masterson wrote: > > Hank, > > I don't know why "autogas" (propane?) is so relatively cheap in > Australia. > > In the U.S., domestic heating oil (essentially diesel) is currently > at an average price of $3.71/gal and propane (sold as domestic > heating fuel) is currently at an average price of $2.66/gal here. > > That makes propane about 30% less expensive per gallon than heating > oil when sold in bulk for home use. I'm comparing the heating fuel > prices because propane is not generally sold as a vehicle fuel here. > These prices therefore compare with a similar level of taxation. I > note that diesel road fuel is about $1.30 per gallon higher than > heating oil and that would be a fair reflection of the typical > vehicle fuel tax load including Federal, state, and local taxes. > > For what it's worth, you're quoting "autogas" at about 65% less > expensive than petrol per unit of measure. That is a pretty > significant savings and covers the lower miles per gallon (kilometers > per liter) you get with propane. > > Propane has about 92,000 Btu/gal while gasoline has about 124,000 btu/ > gal. So, your rate of use for the same amount of work is about 25% > higher with propane. > > So, adjusting for the difference between the costs and efficiencies, > propane is only about 5% cheaper based on U.S. prices. This is a > "savings" that would quickly disappear once the increased demand > pushed up the cost of propane. > > For what ever reason, there is a substantial cost differential in > Australia that does not carry over to the U.S. > > Another writer addressed the operating issues that occur in colder > climates -- something that Australia, to my knowledge, does not have > in a significant measure. During and earlier "gas crisis" many > vehicles in corporate and government fleets were converted to use > propane or compressed natural gas. In large part, those vehicles have > not been replaced with similar technology when they were worn out. > This would tend to suggest that, under the conditions of the various > vehicle fleets, that the change was not economically advantageous. > Corporate vehicle fleets are usually closely monitored for the > economics of their operation, and if experimental operations prove > effective at lowering costs or increasing efficiency, they will be > implemented. > > I note that there is some experimentation with converting transit > busses to gasoline-electric hybrid operation like the Toyota Prius. > The new owners of BB Coachworks are one of the vendors making such > conversions. > > Pete Masterson > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 > El Sobrante CA > aeonix1@... > > > > On Jun 22, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Henry Jay Hannigan wrote: > > <snip> > > Let's see..I pay 62 cents a litre for "autogas" and $1.73 per litre > > for petrol(American gasoline) and miles per gallon differences > > between "autogas" and petrol and power difference are nearly > > negligible to me and over a million Australians utilizing "autogas." > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)