WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???

[Scott Forman]

Humans are not responsible for global warming. The sun is. The
earth's average temperatures have fallen for the last ten years,
coinciding with a reduction in solar activity as a part of the sun's
normal cycle. The mainstream media is ignoring this data, but sooner
or later the whole global warming deal is going to be blown out of
the water.

Scott Forman
86 PT38 that proudly belches hydrocarbons
Memphis

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady
wrote:
>
> Leroy,
>
> It's cause bio fuels "complete the carbon cycle". To a degree
anyway.
> The idea is that thru photosynthesis, a plant converts sunlight and
carbon
> dioxide into complex carbohydrates which we then convert into bio
fuels.
> Completing the carbon cycle means that the CO2 released into the
atmosphere
> when we burn the bio-fuel is then removed from the atmosphere thru
> photosynthesis. Compare this to burning dino fuels, where the CO2
released
> is extracted from the ground and adds to "new" CO2 to the
atmosphere.
> This is one of the ways that scientists no that humans are
responsible for
> global warming. We look at the age of the carbon in the
atmosphere's CO2.
> What we're finding is that an ever larger percentage of the carbon
> isotopes in
> the atmosphere is the same carbon isotope found in dino fuels; i.e,
> humans put
> it there thru burning dino fuels.
>
> David Brady
> '02 LXi, NC
>
> Leroy Eckert wrote:
> >
> > Alright Pete, it has been 40 years since I did my college
chemistry
> > classes and I have not done a damn thing with it since.
> > I have a question; don't mean to get into a chemistry class on
the
> > forum; just interested in something.
> > If finished bio-diesel has a published average formula of
C19H36O2 and
> > average common diesel has a formula of C12H23 how is bio-diesel
better
> > for the air we breath? Does something happen in the combustion
> > chamber?? Are the farmers stroking me?? CH4 is clean so to speak.
> >
> > Leroy Eckert
> > 1990 WB-40 Royale
> > Dahlonega, GA
> > Smoke N Mirrors
> >
> > --- On *Sat, 6/21/08, Pete Masterson //* wrote:
> >
> > From: Pete Masterson
> > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO
GAS AT
> > GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
> > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 4:59 PM
> >
> > Yes, I was confused by the "autogas" thing. I thought it was
CNG.
> > However most of the points still apply, although LPG is
slightly
> > heavier per gallon.
> >
> >
> > Natural gas is primarily methane (CH4) (with small amounts of
a
> > panoply of more complex gases -- butane, propane, etc.) while
LPG
> > is a mixture of various gases with the major component being
> > either (or both) butane (C4H10) or/and propane (C3H8). Natural
> > gas, being primarily methane, is considered a very clean
fossil
> > fuel due to the small carbon content (1 atom for every 4
hydrogen)
> > as it produces the least CO2 per unit of weight of any in this
> > class of fossil fuel.
> >
> > Pete Masterson
> > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42
> > El Sobrante CA
> > aeonix1@mac. com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 21, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Steve Pfiffner wrote:
> >
> >> There seems to be some confusion, CNG (compressed natural
gas)
> >> and LPG
> >> (evidently called Autogas in
> >> Australia and butane/propane in the US) are not really the
same
> >> thing.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >> Wannabee
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1511 - Release Date:
6/20/2008 11:52 AM
> >
>