Weights and Measures

[bubblerboy64]

Thanks guys, I was looking to see how the ratio of weight to HP
worked out in these vehicles. The winner of course is the PT 38 with
the 475 HP engine. The PT 36 and the SP appear to be dead even.
There are other factors to be considered, just wanted a idea of who
had what.
John Heckman
central Pa
1973 FC. The ole Napper with 24,000 lbs and 200 hp isn't all that
out of the running. Transmission and suspension holding it back.





>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "bubblerboy64"
> wrote:
> >
> > Can some one give me an idea of the "ready to roll" weights on a
> couple
> > of these coaches. The ones I am interested in are the SP, PT
40,
> and
> > PT 38, and PT 36. My reason for asking? Just would like to
have a
> > ruff HP to weight ratio. My Napper is just at 12 tons with 200hp
and
> > I'd like to do a little number crunching. I know the HP ratings
of
> the
> > various machines, don't know the weight. Not looking for exact
> numbers
> > just a ball park to get an idea.
> >
> > John Heckman
> > central Pa
> > 1973 FC
> >
> Hi John
> I have a '90 SP 36. Weighs about 33,000 # with the 3208 turbo
turned
> up to about 300 horsepower. Pulls 7000#s at 60-62 mph and gets 6.7
mpg.
> Bob Criss
> Bethel Park, PA
>
> '90SP36
>