Federal smog laws GregO'Connor

[Stephen Birtles]

Well so much for visiting California



--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Forman"
<scottforman75@...> wrote:
>
> Are you telling me that someday a govt bureaucrat is going to show up
> and tell me my bus cannot be driven and is now worthless unless I
> spend 10's of thousands on a re-power of some kind???
>
> Scott Forman
> 86 PT38
> Memphis
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Fogleman"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello BB family, regarding the emission laws rthere are compliance
> date for
> > various engine years , And also if the engines cant meet the
> compliance
> > you will need to repower are scrap , This all started with the
> federal
> > government. Makeing california clean up the Air quality and if
> California
> > cant Comply.The Federal Government will hold funding. That
> California needs
> > for Road work and etc,This is why Arnold the Governor and AQMD and
> all the
> > other agencies have such a push on getting the Air cleaned up.
> Go to this
> > site for more info http://WWW.arb.ca.gov
> >
> > Chris E. Fogleman
> >
> > Complete Coach Works
> >
> > Alternative Fuel Sales Manager
> >
> > Cell: (951) 836-6520
> >
> > http://www.thelegacyreturns.com <http://www.thelegacyreturns.com/>
> >
> > cfogleman@
> >
> > cfogleman@
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Don Bradner
> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 1:16 PM
> > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Federal smog laws GregO'Connor
> >
> >
> >
> > I know, and Greg is certainly correct when he says that California
> is
> > employing such standards quicker than Federal, but the question is
> about
> > something in Federal (or California, for that matter) rules that
> will make
> > us comply with smog rules (which would mean repowering, or junking).
> >
> > On 12/7/2008 at 8:28 AM Pete Masterson wrote:
> >
> > >FWIW, ULSD is the only diesel sold in CA for the last couple of
> years...
> > >
> > >Pete Masterson
> > >'95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42
> > >aeonix1@mac. com
> > >On the road at Newberry Springs, CA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Don Bradner wrote:
> > >
> > >> Greg, can you provide a cite for this? I spent extensive time
> with
> > >> Google and could not come up with any federal requirements that
> did
> > >> not involve one of the following:
> > >>
> > >> New engines
> > >> ULSD fuel
> > >>
> > >> Neither of those would adversely affect my coach, so I would
> like
> > >> to know if you have some hard-to-find information concerning
> > >> federal rules that would, in fact, affect vintage stuff?
> > >>
> > >> Don Bradner
> > >> 90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
> > >> Posting today by satellite from Gladewater, TX
> > >> My location: http://www.bbirdmaps.com/user2.cfm?user=1
> > >>
> > >> On 12/6/2008 at 5:03 PM timvasqz wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Diesel
> > >>> motorhomes with "private registration" are exempt from many CA
> smog
> > >>> requirements but will be hit blind sighted when fed regulations
> take
> > >>> hold.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>