Federal smog laws GregO'Connor

[timvasqz]

Hmmm sounds like bad new for our older Buses and Greg; but its a bit of good news for me at least when I tell Greg that I can finally put a down payment for this 2005baby;

I can always somehow find a silver linning in a bit of bad news.....lol

Tim of Tim & Greg

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Birtles" wrote:
>
> Well so much for visiting California
>
>
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Forman"
> scottforman75@ wrote:
> >
> > Are you telling me that someday a govt bureaucrat is going to show up
> > and tell me my bus cannot be driven and is now worthless unless I
> > spend 10's of thousands on a re-power of some kind???
> >
> > Scott Forman
> > 86 PT38
> > Memphis
> >
> > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Fogleman"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello BB family, regarding the emission laws rthere are compliance
> > date for
> > > various engine years , And also if the engines cant meet the
> > compliance
> > > you will need to repower are scrap , This all started with the
> > federal
> > > government. Makeing california clean up the Air quality and if
> > California
> > > cant Comply.The Federal Government will hold funding. That
> > California needs
> > > for Road work and etc,This is why Arnold the Governor and AQMD and
> > all the
> > > other agencies have such a push on getting the Air cleaned up.
> > Go to this
> > > site for more info http://WWW.arb.ca.gov
> > >
> > > Chris E. Fogleman
> > >
> > > Complete Coach Works
> > >
> > > Alternative Fuel Sales Manager
> > >
> > > Cell: (951) 836-6520
> > >
> > > http://www.thelegacyreturns.com <http://www.thelegacyreturns.com/>
> > >
> > > cfogleman@
> > >
> > > cfogleman@
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Don Bradner
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 1:16 PM
> > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Federal smog laws GregO'Connor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I know, and Greg is certainly correct when he says that California
> > is
> > > employing such standards quicker than Federal, but the question is
> > about
> > > something in Federal (or California, for that matter) rules that
> > will make
> > > us comply with smog rules (which would mean repowering, or junking).
> > >
> > > On 12/7/2008 at 8:28 AM Pete Masterson wrote:
> > >
> > > >FWIW, ULSD is the only diesel sold in CA for the last couple of
> > years...
> > > >
> > > >Pete Masterson
> > > >'95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42
> > > >aeonix1@mac. com
> > > >On the road at Newberry Springs, CA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Don Bradner wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Greg, can you provide a cite for this? I spent extensive time
> > with
> > > >> Google and could not come up with any federal requirements that
> > did
> > > >> not involve one of the following:
> > > >>
> > > >> New engines
> > > >> ULSD fuel
> > > >>
> > > >> Neither of those would adversely affect my coach, so I would
> > like
> > > >> to know if you have some hard-to-find information concerning
> > > >> federal rules that would, in fact, affect vintage stuff?
> > > >>
> > > >> Don Bradner
> > > >> 90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
> > > >> Posting today by satellite from Gladewater, TX
> > > >> My location: http://www.bbirdmaps.com/user2.cfm?user=1
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12/6/2008 at 5:03 PM timvasqz wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Diesel
> > > >>> motorhomes with "private registration" are exempt from many CA
> > smog
> > > >>> requirements but will be hit blind sighted when fed regulations
> > take
> > > >>> hold.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>