PT40 vs SP36

[Leroy Eckert]

No noise for the ears. I guess a cd with a boom box tied to the accelerator would work. It just does not see right. lol Leroy Eckert 1990 WB-40 Smoke N Mirrors Dahlonega, GA Royale Conversion --- On Sun, 1/11/09, timvasqz wrote: From: timvasqz Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: PT40 vs SP36 To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 7:23 PM Drive a Tesla and its over for you with gasoline engines in a sports car. cant be described. GregoryO'Connor 'Smart Guy (for an Excavator)'. I hate the quilifying sufix 94ptCa --- In "WanderlodgeForum%40yahoogroups.com", Pete Masterson wrote: Obviously, a shorter 'bird with fewer axles will handle with more "sports car" like performance (for a bus). Having actually driven a number of sports cars in my earlier days, I > don't think it would occur to me to describe any Blue Bird in terms > of sports car handling. 'Birds do handle much better than the trucks > I drove while I was in the Army, however. > > Pete Masterson > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 (For Sale) > <http://www.aeonix. biz/BBforsale. html> > El Sobrante CA > aeonix1@... > > > > > On Jan 11, 2009, at 7:05 AM, bbwlwb88 wrote: > > > Burton, the 1991 40' Bird was the first year in which the factory > > installed a significantly quieter generator. It was a major > > improvement. As far as the SP36 being the Corvette of Blue Birds, I > > believe that title belongs to the PT38 with the 8V92 engine. The SP > > 36 is a nice coach but having traveled with several in mountains out > > west on the way to rallies, I saw three that had overheated on climbs > > up mountain passes. My recommendation would be to look for a 1991 or > > newer pusher with the 8V92. Having owned 5 Birds since 1983, I have > > never had a significant problem finding a campground where lenth was > > the main problem. Usually the problem has been finding a campground > > where the trees are trimmed to give enough overhead clearance. Most > > campgrounds today can handle 40'plus coaches and they keep overhead > > clearances adequately trimmed. > > > > Royal Washburn > > 97WL43' > > > > --- In "WanderlodgeForum%40yahoogroups.com", "blackmarjohn" > > wrote: > >> > >> Ok I have taken the advice to heart and in the process of opening my > >> wallet. Moving from looking at FC projects, to get in and go PT > > or SP. > >> > >> I have heard the sp is the corvette of the Birds but they also > > appear > >> to be hard to find and expensive in relation to PT40's. > >> > >> The market appears to have have lots of PT's for sale now any reason > >> why? > >> > >> I assume bigger is better and the 8v92 is preferred over the 6v92? > >> The series 60 coaches are still to far from my new expanded budget. > >> > >> Is a PT40 too big for camping in state parks in the south east? Are > >> the generators quite enough for national parks? We are in Atlanta > > and > >> wold like to use the coach for weekend trips within 150 miles of > >> Atlanta to control expenses and get our feet wet. Maybe summer to > >> Yellowstone any thoughts on this would be helpful as well. > >> > >> Thank you all for the help. > >> > >> Burton > >> Wannabe > >> Cumming GA > >> > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >