6V92 Detroit

[Kurt Horvath]

Well Gregg you got me curious. I looked at the web site you posted.

Why isn't it a good idea to use a CCV on a 2 stroke?

When I researched this system all the inf. I found for it was on the
boat sites, As I recall most of them had some sort of system to keep
the oily mist off of and out of the enclosed engine compartments.

I don't recall any reference to this being detrimental to any engine
type.

Either way a catch can keeps the oil from dripping on the ground,,
the CCV recycles the gasses from the slobber tube back into the fresh
air flow to be burnt again and keeps oil from dripping on the ground.

The mfg.'s offered systems for all engine types and manufacturers ---

So what up???

Kurt Horvath
95 PT 42
10AC




In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "timvasqz" wrote:
>
> the drip from the slobbertubes is a function of scaveging and
> necessary with the two stroke jimmies. There was a time when some
> would direct the discharge back to the sump. All the aftermarket
> engineering has down sides.
>
> The s60 is four stroke and has a way different setup. If slobber
> bothers, you dont sleep sitting up and get a four stroke.
>
> Here is an article on the diffs between 2 and four strokes some
times
> refered to as two cycle and four cycle. "blower" and "turbo" are
also
> two terms confused which differ.
>
> http://www.yachtsurvey.com/comparing_diesel_types.htm
>
> Greg ofTim&Greg
> 94ptca
>
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Kurt Horvath"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Scooter,
> >
> > If it becomes bothersome you can install a trap or a CCV ( Closed
> > Crankcase Ventilation System )
> > Racor makes one as well as Walker . They are used quite a bit on
> > boats.
> > I didn't like the oily film on the coach or trailer. I installed
a
> > Racor and am very happy with it's performance.
> >
> > Kurt Horvath
> > 95 PT 42
> > 10AC
> >
> >
> > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Al Scudder
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Coming from the Boating world every 6v92 and 8v92 applications
> > needed Pampers under the engine bays, and for long runs you
needed
> to
> > wipedown the engine room, but they always kept going.Scooter
2000LX
> > Ocqueoc, MI
> > >
> > > To: WanderlodgeForum@: jburgessx2@: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:59:23
> > +0000Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: 6V92 Detroit
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pete,No oil-related crashes behind me yet - must mean I'm good
to
> > go. I noticed the motor discharged about a 5" circle of oil after
I
> > parked it after an 1800 mile run (1800 miles in 36 hours). I
> checked
> > the oil level and only added about 1 quart (or so) after 1800
> miles.
> > I'm guessing that's not too bad for oil consumption. I think this
> > motor had an in-frame rebuild about 56k miles ago. So, wanted to
> make
> > sure it wasn't doing something out of the ordinary. I can't
imagine
> > the engine going bad already unless it was abused by the
> > PO.Thanks.Jerry 85 PT40Port Hueneme, CA--- In
> > WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Pete Masterson
> wrote:>>
> > Those are commonly called "the slobber tubes" and, yes, they
> normally
> > > discharge oil-looking stuff (which is primarily oil).> > If the
> > cars following behind you on the highway are sliding off into a >
> > ditch, that's too much.> > Pete Masterson> '95 Blue Bird
> Wanderlodge
> > WBDA 42 (For Sale)> <http://www.aeonix.biz/BBforsale.html>> El
> > Sobrante CA> aeonix1@> > > > > On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:14 AM,
> > jburgessx2 wrote:> > > I'm new to these Detroit engines. I
noticed
> > the 6v92 has two hoses> > that hang from the bottom and
> occasionally
> > discharge what appears to > > be> > some oil. Are these supposed
to
> > do that? If so, how much is too > > much?> >> > Jerry> > 85 PT40>
>
> > Port Hueneme, CA>
> > >
> >
>