315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight
|
03-25-2009, 06:58
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight
No problem mixing on different axles. Until yesterday mine had Michelin
(steers), Goodyear (drivers), and Goodrich (tags). I expect to always have mixed sizes, as I am not going to put 315s on the drivers. While it might be possible (Shane is doing it) with 8.25-inch rims you have to over-inflate to keep adequate clearance between them. The 315 is an inch wider than the 12R. It is also 0.3 inches smaller in diameter, but that won't be obvious on either steer or tag. Fred, my tires don't come anywhere near the jack pad, so they must be differently positioned on the 90 compared to the 97. On 3/25/2009 at 4:59 PM davisgr wrote: >I like the idea of having fresh steers and averaging out the tire budget >out over the long haul. But, how do I start the "rotation purchase" if I >am buying different tires? I assume I can not mix Michelin 315s and my >Toyo 12Rx22.5s on an axle, but can I mix tire brands/sizes between the >axles? > >Rick Davis >1993-FreeNezi >Tennessee, and Houston > > > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Don Bradner" >wrote: >> >> Besides the single purchase wallet-breaker, I like the idea of keeping >the steer tires "fresher" than everything else. My intent is to keep them >at 3 years or less, using the following: >> >> Year 1 Steers to tag, new steers >> Year 2 None >> Year 3 Steers to tag, new steers >> Year 4 New drivers >> Year 5 None >> Year 6 Repeat year one >> >> Year 1, January of 2007 at purchase, was determined by 2003 tires on >steers, 2004 on drivers, and 1997 on tag. >> >> On 3/24/2009 at 8:47 PM Fred Hulse wrote: >> >> >Don >> > >> >"Gulp" is very true >> >Last summer we put 8 of those on the coach. >> >Hopefully we won't have to worry about tires for a long while. >> > >> >Fred & Jeanne Hulse >> >Morristown Arizona >> >1997 Wanderlodge WLWB41 >> > > > > >------------------------------------ > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 14:04
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 16:25
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 16:47
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 17:41
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 18:33
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 04:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - davisgr - 03-25-2009, 05:59
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009 06:58
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-25-2009, 13:49
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-25-2009, 14:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 14:38
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - sfedeli3 - 03-26-2009, 01:17
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-26-2009, 13:20
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-26-2009, 13:26
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-26-2009, 14:29
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Steve Pfiffner - 03-26-2009, 14:48
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-26-2009, 15:19
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-26-2009, 15:40
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - rogerwwebb@... - 03-26-2009, 20:16
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-27-2009, 04:07
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:29
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:31
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:37
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 05:21
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 06:09
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 07:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Wayne Kotila - 03-27-2009, 07:20
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-27-2009, 08:33
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Kurt Horvath - 03-27-2009, 11:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 12:17
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-27-2009, 12:27
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:44
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 14:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-28-2009, 05:11
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Jim Riordan - 04-01-2009, 14:23
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 04-03-2009, 02:50
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 04-03-2009, 07:43
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)