Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight
03-27-2009, 04:37
Post: #23
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight
Try getting that kind of response from Michelin. I know of no one that has ever
been able to satisfy a claim with Michelin. If you know of someone, I'd like to
talk to them.

R.E. (Ron) Marabito, Dallas, TX 92WB40

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, rogerwwebb@... wrote:
>
> FWIW - I now have Michelins.
>
> In 2007 I bought Goodyear G149 tires, which were a bit less expensive and I
> thought would be just as good. I was wrong.
>
> I had catastrophic tread separation with less than 9,000 miles on two
> separate occasions, both times caused damage to the coach. Goodyear replaced
the
> tires and paid for the coach damage. However, as I did not trust the tires I
> asked for a refund or replacement of all the tires. Unfortunately the G149's
> were the only tire they made (including other brands they own) that fit and
> although they offered to replace all the tires with new G149's I was uneasy
> with such action, as they could/would not tell me why a new set was going to
> be better than the old set. I got disgusted and changed out to the
Michelins.
> I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND GOODYEAR TIRES due to this experience.
>
> R. W. Webb
> 91 WL
> Cedar Rapids, IA
>
>
> In a message dated 3/26/2009 9:44:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> bluethunder@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> I can only put it this way: tires are one thing I'm not looking for the
> least expensive alternative.
>
> On 3/27/2009 at 12:26 AM ronmarabito2002 wrote:
>
> >Why would you want to pay +$200 to $300 per tire for Michelins? Do you
> >actually perceive that additional value in your tires? I have yet to wear
> >out any tire unless it was mis-aligned or damaged. Mine change due to age
> >and a less expensive tire does the job.
> >
> >R.E. (Ron) Marabito, Dallas, TX 92WB40
> >
> >--- In _WanderlodgeForum@WanderlodgeFWan_
> (mailto:WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com) , "Don Bradner"
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> The price was $709.89 each, before a lot of taxes, etc.
> >>
> >> The MSRP is something over $800, but I'm not sure if anyone ever charges
> >full list.
> >>
> >> So far the X Coach is only 295/80, which is an inch less in diameter
> >than the 315/80 XZA-2 and 1.3 inches less than the 12R XZE*
> >>
> >> To handle your weight, assuming equal weight on each axle end:
> >> 315/80 XZA-2 95 PSI
> >> 295/80 X-Coach 110 PSI
> >> 12R XZE* 115 PSI
> >>
> >> On 3/26/2009 at 1:02 AM Bob Lawrence wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Don,
> >> >What did you have to pay for the steer tires?
> >> >Next month I want to get new steers.
> >> >I see Michelin has new X Coach XZ bus tires on their website.
> >> >Trying to figure what way to go.
> >> >My front end is 13,800 lbs. now.
> >> >Bob Lawrence
> >> >84 PT36
> >> >Laguna Atascosa NWR, Los Fresnos, Texas (Where a guy shot himself to
> >death
> >> >today)
> >> >
> >> >> Got my new steer tires today, 315/80R Michelin XZA-2 Energies. Moved
> >my
> >> >2+ year-old 12R XZE* to the tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> Really happy to have the tires down near 100 lbs fully capable of
> >> >handling the weight that took near 120 lbs on the 12Rs!
> >> >>
> >> >> The price of the tires though is one of those "gulp" items.
> >> >>
> >> >> A footnote: When I bought Blue Thunder I rather immediately had to
> >> >replace the left front wheel because it had a severe crack that was
> >> >intolerable for a steer wheel. Today it was pointed out that the left
> >tag
> >> >wheel had multiple cracks - some horseshoe from outer hole to inner back
> >> >to outer. Not good. The local tire place had a lot of excellent used
> >ones,
> >> >so I replaced that wheel. Going to have a lot of work to get it looking
> >as
> >> >good as the other ones Sad
> >> >> Don Bradner
> >> >> 90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
> >> >> My location: http://www.bbirdmaps. My locati My locat
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make meals for Under
> $10. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=e...od00000002)
>
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 14:04
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 16:25
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 16:47
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 17:41
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 18:33
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 04:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - davisgr - 03-25-2009, 05:59
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 06:58
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-25-2009, 13:49
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-25-2009, 14:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 14:38
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - sfedeli3 - 03-26-2009, 01:17
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-26-2009, 13:20
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-26-2009, 13:26
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-26-2009, 14:29
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Steve Pfiffner - 03-26-2009, 14:48
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-26-2009, 15:19
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-26-2009, 15:40
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - rogerwwebb@... - 03-26-2009, 20:16
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-27-2009, 04:07
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:29
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:31
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009 04:37
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 05:21
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 06:09
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 07:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Wayne Kotila - 03-27-2009, 07:20
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-27-2009, 08:33
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Kurt Horvath - 03-27-2009, 11:02
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 12:17
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-27-2009, 12:27
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:44
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 14:46
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-28-2009, 05:11
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Jim Riordan - 04-01-2009, 14:23
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 04-03-2009, 02:50
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 04-03-2009, 07:43



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)