A little of subject but something of interest
|
06-16-2005, 04:17
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
A little of subject but something of interest
--IN Australia most of the people use LPG in cars..much cheaper!! My
old toyota is dual fuel; petrol and LPG just pull up to the pump and fill up with LPG..no big deal here we are way behind. later Hank Hannigan 90SP and lovin it!!!! - In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Tom Warner wrote: > Jack I still remember the gas shortage scare of the 1970s when I was going > to college. Everyone forcasted the gloom and doom of the future and said we > would all be commuting on skate boards and bicycles powered by rubber > bands. Americans never learn. We went back to our old wasteful habits again > and the environmentalists put up a smoke screen that stopped development of > refineries etc. When will we every learn. > > I want a new Mercedes Diesel but nice old New York is thinking about > banning them. You already cannot get a VW passat diesel. > > tom > 1982 FC35 > Vernon Center,NY > > At 01:56 PM 6/16/2005 +0000, you wrote: > >Yeah Blair, I got the book you recommended, "The Long Emergency" and > >just started reading it. > >It will be a fight to get people into electric cars! Remember about > >10 or 15 years ago, GM(?) brought one out, and the Feds said that by > >the year 2005, 25% of the cars on the road would be electric? Where > >are they?????? > >Nuclear Power? I think that France, Switzerland Japan, and other > >countrys also, use it almost 100%. Difference there is that they have > >a "Standard" plant, almost like buying one 'Off The Shelf' at WalMart. > > Here, each and every plant was designed and built from the ground up, > >and everything had to be tested, re-tested & approved by the NRC. > >The Greenies have done so well with thier scare tactics that no > >nuclear can be built in the future. > >Refinerys? Wern't quite a few closed in the Houston area a number of > >years ago?? Why can't they be reopened? > >But that would not help California much, as we have standards that > >require our Gasoline to be refined here with certian additives, so we > >cannot import or export any of our gas. > >Jack Smith > >1973FC31 > >SoCal > >============================================================ > > > > > > > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Blair wrote: > > > Well, that's a yes and a no.....please read the following, Blair > > > > > > "Boone Pickens Warns of Petroleum Production Peak > > > > > > >Legendary Oklahoma energy magnate, T. Boone Pickens will be 77 > >years old > > > > > > > >this month, and maybe because of that, he feels free to speak what's on > > > >his > > > >mind; and he did to an audience of alternative fuel advocates in Palm > > > >Springs today. > > > > > > > >Addressing the 11th National Clean Cities conference, hosted by the > > > >former > > > >mayor of Palm Springs and introduced by former U.S. Energy Secretary > > > >John > > > >Herrington (1984-1989), Boone, as his friends refer to him, was candid > > > >in > > > >his views of wind energy, nuclear power, natural gas, and in particular > > > >petroleum. > > > > > > > >While he acknowledges wind power is cheap today, he, as well as > > > >former-Secretary Herrington, questioned the contribution it can make to > > > >the > > > >nation's future energy needs. He finds nuclear power attractive and > > > >believes natural gas should be used to power our transportation fleets > > > >rather than to generate electricity. In general, he was very upbeat > > > >about > > > >the prospects for alternative transportation fuels. > > > > > > > >But on the future of petroleum, he was less sanguine. > > > > > > > >"Let me tell you some facts the way I see it," he began. "Global oil > > > >(production) is 84 million barrels (a day). I don't believe you can get > > > >it > > > >any more than 84 million barrels. I don't care what (Saudi Crown > >Prince) > > > > > > > >Abdullah, (Russian Premier Vladimir) Putin or anybody else says about > > > >oil > > > >reserves or production. I think they are on decline in the biggest oil > > > >fields in the world today and I know what's it like once you turn the > > > >corner and start declining, it's a tread mill that you just can't keep > > > >up > > > >with. > > > > > > > >"So, when you start adding the reserves in these countries, you're not > > > >even > > > >replacing what you're taking out. > > > > > > > >"Let me take you to another situation quickly. 84 million barrels a day > > > >times 365 days is 30 billion barrels of oil a year that we're > >depleting. > > > > > > > >All of the world's (oil) industry doesn't even come close to replacing > > > >30 > > > >billion barrels of oil. We don't spend enough money to even give > > > >ourselves > > > >a chance to replace 30 billion barrels. It may be because the prospects > > > >are > > > >not there. I rather imagine that's what the answer is to that. > > > > > > > >"So, if you accept that 84 million barrels a day is all the world can > > > >(produce), and then look at refining capacity, I think it's just a > > > >coincidence that refining capacity... world capacity... is 84 million > > > >barrels a day. So, we're in balance: 84, 84. > > > > > > > >"Now you see the projections for the fourth quarter of '05, I mean like > > > >tomorrow; it is 86 to 87 million barrels of oil a day required. China > > > >(and) > > > >India (are) growing fast. Our economy is going down a little bit, > >but it > > > > > > > >doesn't seem to be shutting off demand for gasoline, oil, natural gas, > > > >whatever. But around the world... just assume that the (U.S.) > >economy is > > > > > > > >slowing, but China is still ramped up; it is still 86, 87 million for > > > >the > > > >fourth quarter. > > > > > > > >"Now we've got some pretty good inventory, those will be... I think.. > > > >they'll be gone in the third quarter. I can't wait to see how this is > > > >all > > > >going to play out. > > > > > > > >"Don't let the day-to-day NYMEX (New York Mercantile Exchange) fool > >you, > > > > > > > >because it can turn and go the other direction. I may be wrong. Some of > > > >the > > > >experts say we'll be down to $35 oil by the end of the year. I think > > > >it'll > > > >be $60 oil by the end of the year. You're going to see $3 gasoline > > > >twelve > > > >months from today, or some time during that period. I know you've > > > >already > > > >experienced it in California. I am not that much out of it... But > >in the > > > > > > > >Midwest you've probably got $2.20 today. That's the way I see it > > > >unfolding". > > > > > > > >Pickens went to explain that if he were Energy "Czar", he'd immediately > > > >begin to phase out the use of natural gas in electric power generation > > > >and > > > >encourage the construction of more coal-fired and nuclear power plants. > > > >He'd use the natural gas to power transportation instead. > > > > > > > >Speaking of the various alternative fuels, he stated, "I don't > >think any > > > >of > > > >them can miss. I think some will be further out than others. > >Hydrogen, I > > > > > > > >think, is going to take a long time". Speaking before an audience with > > > >vested interests in ethanol, biodiesel, propane and compressed natural > > > >gas > > > >as transportation fuels, he added that he believes all the alternatives > > > >will work. > > > > > > > >"We're going to have to use shale oil the western slope of the Rockies. > > > >That's going to happen. The technology is just about here", he noted, > > > >adding that he blames both Republican and Democratic > >administrations for > > > > > > > >not engaging in long term planning to meet the nation's future energy > > > >needs. > > > > > > > >"It's all getting very, very tight. We're just about there. The sixty > > > >percent we import now (of petroleum), is about all we can get from the > > > >countries that export". He cited the example of Venezuela where its > > > >"screwball" leader, Hugo Chavez has pledged to not sell any additional > > > >oil > > > >to the United States. > > > > > > > >"The majors, they talk about plenty of oil and that they can produce > > > >more, > > > >but if you look at ExxonMobile, ChevronTexaco, BP (British Petroleum), > > > >all > > > >the production (is) going down every year. They don't replace and they > > > >don't add to production, but they say there's plenty of oil around. > > > > > > > >"Now why would they say that? One of the chief economists with one of > > > >the > > > >major oil companies... I was at a conference where he was... we were > > > >talking and I asked, why do they say that? And he said, can you imagine > > > >what would happen if one of these major oil company's CEO's got up and > > > >made > > > >a speech and he said, 'We're running out of oil'? I said there'd be > > > >panic > > > >and he said, 'That's right. They're not going to make the statement. > > > >They're going to say there's plenty of oil around'". > > > > > > > >"I know that sounds rather simple, but that's the best answer I've > > > >had... > > > >why they keep saying that there's plenty of oil around. I can't > >tell you > > > > > > > >positive, but I am just so sure that we have peaked and from here > >on the > > > > > > > >demand side that we are going to have a hard time making the trip on > > > >fuel. > > > >I know demand will come down with price. That will happen". > > > > > > > >He answered several audience questions and predicted that if the summer > > > >is > > > >hot in the Southeast that natural gas prices will go to $10. "Natural > > > >gas > > > >is in decline", he stated, concluding that eventually the market will > > > >sort > > > >out the winners and losers". > > > > > > > >After his remarks, EV World asked Mr. Pickens if he agrees with > > > >Houston-based investment banker Matthew Simmons that Saudi Arabia's oil > > > >fields may be on the verge of decline and he replied that he did agree > > > >him. > > > > > > > >If Pickens and Simmons are correct, then Crown Prince Abdullah's > > > >promises > > > >to raise production over the next ten years to 15 million barrels a day > > > >may > > > >be just wishful thinking, in which case, Saudi Arabia's role as swing > > > >producer and oil price stabilizer may be a thing of the past. Oil > >prices > > > > > > > >will begin to experience unprecedented volatility, which is likely to > > > >place > > > >serious stresses on a world largely unprepared for the end of cheap > > > >fossil > > > >fuels. The road from here on will be a bumpy one." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 04:40 AM 6/16/2005, you wrote: > > > >mikes got it right..randy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Mike Hohnstein > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:27 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] A little of subject but > >something of > > > > interest > > > > > > > > > > > > That's all good but the real problem is the lack of refining > >capacity > > > > in this country. The "not in my back yard" syndrome is the problem > > > > there, not to mention restrictive regulations meant to save the > >world or > > > > something. > > > > Mike Hohnstein > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: DAY8293A@C... > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:53 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] A little of subject but > >something of > > > > interest > > > > > > > > > > > > 55 MAY BE GOOD FOR OUR COACHES, BUT THE BIG RIGS USE > > > > MORE FUEL > > > > GOING 55. I HAD A 4 SPEED CHEVY VEGA SET UP WITH A HIGHWAY > >SPEED > > > > (70 MPH) > > > > REAR END, AND WAS GETTING 30 MPG. MUCH MORE THAN WHEN I BOUGHT IT. > > > > WHEN PRESIDENT "JIMMAY" LOWERED THE SPEED LIMIT TO 55 MPH, I > > > > COULD NO > > > > LONGER MAKE IT UP HILLS IN FOURTH GEAR, AND HAD TO DOWN SHIFT TO > > > > THIRD,,, JUST > > > > LIKE THE BIG TRUCKS HAD TO DO,,, AND DOWN WENT MY FUEL MILEAGE !!! > > > > IT HELPS SOME VEHICLES TO GO SLOW, AND OTHERS CAN CRUISE > >AT HIGHER > > > > SPEEDS AND DO BETTER. I CAN GET 30 MPG IN MY CORVETTE AT 70 > >MPH. (I > > > > USED TO GET > > > > 36 MPG IN MY 93 VETTE) > > > > I THINK PEOPLE WILL SLOW DOWN TO SAVE GAS IF IT WORKS FOR > >THEIR > > > > VEHICLE,,, I KNOW I SLOW DOWN,,, WE DON'T NEED THE GOV'T ON > >OUR CASE > > > > ANYMORE. > > > > WHAT WE DO NEED IS TO LIFT THE NICKLE A GALLON FUEL TAX > >THAT "SLICK > > > > WILLY" PUT ON FUEL WHEN HE WAS IN OFFICE,,,, DAY, IN JAX FLA > > > > ,,,,83PT-40,,, > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- --------- > > ----- > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > > > > > > > ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo .com/ > > group/WanderlodgeForum/ > > > > > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- --------- > > ----- > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > > > > > > > ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo .com/ > > group/WanderlodgeForum/ > > > > > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms > >of Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------- > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > > * > > > > > ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo .com/group/WanderlodgeForum/ > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)