Hi Brad,
Thanks for your clarification. You may be on to something. There's
simply
no way to build something as big as an LXi and not have any flex in the
chassis, and indeed there is strength in flexibility. The LXi is a
departure
from the usual Wanderlodge build methods. It still uses the main
c-channel
backbone, but in addition, it adds supporting framework that envelops
the
backbone. The FC's, PT's and even the Wide Bodies, are all essentially
box over frame construction. The box adds considerable stiffness to what
would otherwise be a rather whippy c-channel backbone. There was no way
that this style of construction could stand a hole cut in the side for
a slide.
The engineers needed to rethink the structure. In the LXi you'll find
the c-channnel
backbone, and connected to it a stout set of triangulated boxes that
make up the
basement. Along the perimeter of the skin there are 5 sets of stout
longitudinal
structures, (1) a pair of longitudinal frame rails that run underneath
the basement
from steer axle to drive axle, (2) extruded aluminum torque tubes at
the top
corners of the roof, (3) the belt bar that runs the full length of the
coach at
the base of the windows, (4) the hip beam that runs the full length of
the coach
at floor level, and (5) a beam that runs at the basement floor outer
corner from
the steer to the drive axle. All of these have vertical supports posts
tying the beams
together at the outer skin. The inside walls are also steel gusseted
from floor
level to the belt bar under the windows. The joints are welded or huck
bolted
together. The folks at the factory, whom I've spoken with, have nothing
but praise
for the rigidity of the slide equipped LXi. It is a rather amazing
piece representing
40 years of evolution along with new design elements meant to support
slide
technology. In my view it's more of a perimeter design than the older
box on
frame style, meaning that the space frame envelops the c-channel and
the two
work in harmony. My hats off to the folks who did it. Now does it ride
rough?
In stock form it does. As everyone here knows by now, I removed my OEM
steer axle anti-sway bar and am overwhelmed by the improvement in ride
and
handling. The stock bar is simply too stiff. This stiffness results in
almost no
independent steer axle wheel movement and excessive vertical suspension
movement. This may be the cause of some of the issues owners have
expressed
with their buses. There may be other causes: tire pressures, ride
height, shocks,
maybe a chassis that's too stiff. I don't know. My own experience is
that with
the anti-sway bar removed you'll be hard pressed to find a better
handing or riding
bus, and I've driven many Prevost's over the years. On the other hand,
I am a
slightly biased LXi owner so feel free to take all of this with a grain
of salt!. LOL.
Good luck in your search.
David Brady
'02 LXi, NC
-----Original
Message-----
From: brad barton <bbartonwx>
Sent: Jan 17, 2010 8:10 PM
To: wanderlodgeforum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Help...Us buy our first motoerhome......
ÃÂ
Wave,
I am only a civilian, not a mechanic, so these are just my
impressions.ÃÂ There are many others who would disagree.ÃÂ Compared to my
35'FC and the 43' LXi, the Newell had much less vertical movement in
travel.ÃÂ It's just the way different manufacturers set up the
suspension and handle the weight on their coaches.ÃÂ
My opinion is that the 43' length of the coach, exaggerated by the wide
travel of the suspension produced either flexes or possibly shocks that
resulted in several failures plus chatters, chirps and rattles,
allÃÂ located near the middle of the coach which I outlined earlier.ÃÂ
Maybe they were all unrelated.ÃÂ Maybe I just had some bad luck- IÃÂ can't
sayÃÂ for sure.ÃÂ
Don't get me wrong, my LXi was, and still is the most elegant coach
I've ever seen.ÃÂ ÃÂ I'm glad I had the experience of owning it.ÃÂ If I was
forced to make a choice right now though, I'd take a close look at a
non-slide LXi, a PT40 or an LX if they were impeccably maintained or
re-done.ÃÂ
Best of luck,
BradÃÂ
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
ÃÂ
"bbartonwx@hotmail.com"
ÃÂ
To: WanderlodgeForum@
yahoogroups.com
From: w5sk@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:57:36 +0000
Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Help...Us buy our first motoerhome......
ÃÂ
Brad,
I am new to this forum. Have owned several glass coaches but looking to
move up to a bus. Currently in a 40' Vogue V 96 which is really a very
nice fiberglass Prevost look alike.
You said that the 43 foot Wonderlodge had some issues with the ride. Do
you think that was the length or the chassis. Could you tell me more?
Thanks,
Wave
Near Medicine Park, Ok.
96 Vogue V
still working
--- In "WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com",
brad barton <bbartonwx@.<wbr>..> wrote:
>
>
> Clyde,
>
> I've owned an 84 FC Blue Bird Wanderlodge, an 86 Newell and a 2000
Wanderlodge LXi. For what it's worth, my 84 FC was the most
trouble-free coach I had, but underpowered (for my taste).
>
> The 86 Newell was the best handling coach I had, a pleasure to
drive, but a few of the parts were getting hard to find in 2004. My LXi
was more problematic than I thought it should've been. I think the 43'
length, excessive vertical movement and body flex were related to
several problems. I'd rather stay at 38-40'.
>
>
>
> Since you're in St. Louis, you'd be fairly close to the Newell
factory in Miami, OK. And they are a pleasure to deal with on
maintenance and service issues (as I'm sure Blue Bird was when their
factory was still in business). A later-model Newell (Series 2000 or
newer) in pristine condition would be a good choice, just keep it
serviced at the factory.
>
>
>
> A late 80's to mid 90's Wanderlodge PT40 or SP36 would be fine if
it's been renovated and free of rust.
>
>
>
> If I were in the market for a bus-style coach, I'd find out who
services Prevost and Marathon coaches in my area and get their opinion
on parts and maintenance.
>
> And, if you buy a metal coach, you'll probably never want to buy a
fiberglass coach again, no matter what the price.
>
>
> No coach, new, used, metal or plastic will be a snap to own and
run. You have to be prepared financially and emotionally for wear,
tear, breakage, replacement parts and plenty of maintenance. One other
thing that's real important is..no leaks. No air leaks at the door, no
water leaks anywhere, roof, windows, tanks or valves. They have a way
of causing more damage to more things than you can imagine. If it
leaks, and they won't guarantee the fix, keep looking. Best of luck.
>
>
> bbartonwx@..
.
>
>
>
>
>
> To: "WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com"
> From: cmlintx@...
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:07:50 -0800
> Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Help...Us buy our first motoerhome......
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My wife and I would like to buy a diesel pusher this spring. In
your opinion, would it be better to buy an older Blue Bird, Prevost, or
Newell or....... a newer Newmar, Holiday Rambler, Fleetwood, or Tiffin?
Our funds are limited so a new ones are out of the question.
>
> Your opinion is welcome and needed!!
>
> Thank You,
> Clyde Byram
> St. Louis, MO
> Want-A-Be Motorhomer
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
>
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
Get
it now.
Member Funded
Link Directory
Wanderlodge Trader
Document Library
User Locations
Gallery
Calendar
/
Help...Us buy our first motoerhome......
![[+]](http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com/images/collapse_collapsed.gif)