Sensor Area Networks (SANs)
|
06-04-2013, 23:55
Post: #41
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sensor Area Networks (SANs)
(06-04-2013 21:16)davidmbrady Wrote: Just a quick update on what I've recently discovered. If it was my business plan instead of Digi's, I'd be giving away Zigbee features in everything in the product line. An extra $100 box? Noooo. I'd dump Zigbee on the market below cost, drive the competition down, buy 'em out, and generally make way for the ubiquitous. Hmm. Client initiation... So when a Zigbee comes on the network, it waits for a broadcast? Then gets discovered, then goes dark and gets scratched off the server list. Why not just wait for another broadcast from the client? Must be a very orderly network. Maybe Digi modems aren't the best way to go. Why not let the zigbees and the arduino do their transmit/aggregate thing, run some statistics on the data periodically to provide near-real-time status in a web page on a monitor. Use the gateway to upload a formatted email to the WaGu server's account, where scripts parse the email and add the data tp the database. It analyzes and calls you on the phone: "The last fuel stop slimed your filters. Vacuum levels will shut the engine down in 2.87654 x 10 23 femtoseconds." OK that was silly, but not bad considering I've forgotten what the modem connection was for. For sure, not the end-all solution. If it isn't going to work, I can forego the explanation of why not. I still think the all-in-one Digi modem is pretty swift. But I don't expect to be getting satellite, in fact my flatscreen is broken. I've turned it into a cabinet door. I like it now ------- Ned Bedinger Southworth, WA '91 SP36 +1988.5 Samurai |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)