FC vs PT re; Repairs and Complexities

[Al]

Tom,
While you are looking at FC & PT, don't forget the BMC line.
You will be able to purchase a 4 - 5 year newer bird for same money
of PT. Have updated interiors and bullet proof cummings engine.
You will not have all the amnenties as the wanderlodge but the
systems you do have will be 4 - 5 years newer. You will get better
fuel mileage on the BMC compared to the PT. The BMC will get 8 mpg
running all day at interstate speeds. BMC is a best kept secret of
Bluebird.

Al & Kathy Johnson
Mandeville, Louisiana ( being a lumberjack for a long time due to
the wrath of Ms. Katrina. ) Someday we will have all the trees
cleaned off our property.

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "martymc_99"
wrote:
> Mike...the pop of trailer was not serious.
>
> What has been your observation having moved from your FC to
the "newer"
> PT? Similar systems and challenges...other than a bit newer?
>
> I actually am not averse to mechanical efforts...just have learned
that
> the "learning curve" is painful without direction.
>
> My preference after reading adds for a year is the '91-'95 PTs.
Seems
> like the interiors are more "modern" and wife actually likes what
they
> look like. One question is determining what they actually sell
> for...many are priced high and just sit there.
>
> Maybe you could share (by e-mail) your buying experience vs
pricing in
> the various adds? Also, where did you find your PT?
>
> Thanks for your input...those BB's are sure unique!...Tom Rootness
in
> Northern Minnesota