Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38
|
02-02-2006, 14:48
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38
Everyone might find this interesting even though it is comparing
diesel marine versions of these engines. http://www.frybrid.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399 Tom Warner 1982 FC35 Vernon center,NY At 08:18 PM 2/2/2006, you wrote: >Hello Tom, > >You mentioned fuel economy differences between the PT36 and PT38. > >I might soon be in the market for a 70's to 80's Wanderlodge. >However, the motor choices are confusing! The FC35 with a Cat Turbo >3208, the PT36 with a Detroit 6V92, and a PT38 with an Detroit 8V92 >are all similar sized coaches. Performance (225 HP to 475 HP) is >obviously very different. > >With the high price of fuel these days, do any of these motors stand >out in fuel economy? If they are all similar, I guess the more >powerful 8V92 is the way to go! > >Anybody know? > >I'm so happy that I found this group! > >Andy Coleman > > > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Tom Warner > > > > Ron there might be other considerations but then maybe you considered > > them and/or had information that I did not see. For instance, > > unless I absolutely knew what the maintenance history of both coaches > > were and the price that will be finally paid for each including taxes > > and registration fees if there are some ( realizing they had a max > > budget of $50-75K) that would leave somewhere in the range of > > $60,000 not including taxes. > > > > I would go with the coach that fit in that budget IF I knew : > > > > 1. The tires were all servicable and had a DOT date of less then 5 > > years and had some assurance that they had not been abused by running > > over/or under inflated or run over curbs. . > > > > 2. You had service records for the coach to ensure it was regularly > > maintained and not sit for long periods of time. > > > > 3. You consider the fuel mileage. The PT36 with a 6V92 will get > > better mileage then the PT38 with a 8V92. Either one I would have > > inspected by a reputable mechanice to make sure there are no problems > > with the engines. > > > > 4. And lastly use the Vintage birds checklist and go over every > > single item in the coach. That checklist could very well help you get > > a lower price then the owner is willing to go to knowing that there > > are no problems. If everything checks out however you will feel > > better about the price you do have to pay. > > > > Good luck in which ever one you buy. > > > > Tom Warner > > 1982 FC35 > > Vernon Center,NY > > > > > > At 06:03 PM 2/2/2006, you wrote: > > >I've run coaches with both. I would not consider the 6V92 again. On > > >a small coach, it might be fine, but between the two coaches, there is > > >not a lot of weight difference, thus go with the 8V92 for performance. > > >You won't be sorry, unless other considerations are more important. > > > > > >R.E. (Ron) Marabito, Dallas, TX 92WB40 > > >Forum Moderator > > > > > > > > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "buddyballs79" > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello and thanks in advance for the replies. > > > > > > > > > > > > We're looking at two coaches right now, one is an 89 PT 36 with >the 6V > > > > 330 Detroit and the other is an 87 PT38 with the 8V 475hp Detroit. > > > > Both are the silver editions. The PT 36 has 135k and the PT 38 has > > > > 100k. Since they are both a considerable distance away we were > > > > wondering if anybody has had any experience with these coaches. >How is > > > > the performance of the 36 with the 6V Detroit vs the 38 with the 8V? > > > > Any pros or cons for one or the other? It will be our first diesel > > > > motorhome and we love the look of the older Bluebirds. Our >budget is > > > > $50k to $75k max. > > > > > > > > Thanks again for the help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------- > > >YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > > > * Visit your group > > > > "<<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/\ WanderlodgeForum>WanderlodgeForum" >on the web. > > > * > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > * > > > > lodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > * > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > > > > <<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > >---------- > > > > > > > > > > >SPONSORED LINKS ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Recr...;vehi\ cles&w2=Wanderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+dealer&w5=\ Used+recreational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=DAUkCKkU7Dzhn_\ ObWmSYTw>Recreational >vehicles ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Wand...w2=Wa\ nderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+dealer&w5=Used+recre\ ational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=Z-8HJdysB3QLPj9U0JvqYQ>W\ anderlodge ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Auto...3;veh\ icles&w2=Wanderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+dealer&w5\ =Used+recreational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=IF4u_5wI8Pmy3\ 4cC1O9CxA>Automotive >maintenance ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Recr...tiona\ l+vehicles&w2=Wanderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+deal\ er&w5=Used+recreational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=z6_Xahae\ YHfELr6o72IW1A>Recreational >vehicle dealer ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Used...ional\ +vehicles&w2=Wanderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+deale\ r&w5=Used+recreational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=UGEY5km4L\ -kXbDI4ZSadEw>Used >recreational vehicles ><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Auto...vehic\ les&w2=Wanderlodge&w3=Automotive+maintenance&w4=Recreational+vehicle+dealer&w5=U\ sed+recreational+vehicles&w6=Automotive+radiators&c=6&s=163&.sig=ePNVMmISsCWgTnM\ q_4GlXA>Automotive >radiators > > >---------- >YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group > "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum>WanderlodgeForum" on the web. > * > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > * > odgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > * > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > >---------- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - buddyballs79 - 02-02-2006, 10:00
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - ronmarabito2002 - 02-02-2006, 11:03
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Scott Peatross - 02-02-2006, 11:27
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Tom Warner - 02-02-2006, 11:27
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Andy Coleman - 02-02-2006, 13:18
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - ronmarabito2002 - 02-02-2006, 14:17
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - ronmarabito2002 - 02-02-2006, 14:20
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - mbulriss - 02-02-2006, 14:38
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Tom Warner - 02-02-2006 14:48
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Jeff Miller - 02-02-2006, 16:47
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - jvredden@... - 02-02-2006, 21:37
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - krminyl@... - 02-02-2006, 23:43
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - orbitalsolutions - 02-03-2006, 06:20
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Mike Hohnstein - 02-03-2006, 07:03
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Scott Forman - 02-03-2006, 10:31
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Scott Forman - 02-03-2006, 10:33
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - orbitalsolutions - 02-03-2006, 12:23
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Henry Jay Hannigan - 02-03-2006, 14:55
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Mike Hohnstein - 02-04-2006, 03:41
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Jim Owens - 02-04-2006, 05:04
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Jim Owens - 02-04-2006, 05:12
Performance of a PT36 vs a PT38 - Henry Jay Hannigan - 02-04-2006, 09:24
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)