Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CAT 3208 monitoring
03-12-2013, 11:22 (This post was last modified: 03-12-2013 11:26 by Ray Davis.)
Post: #34
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring
I would NOT choose PID 255. PID 255 is a continuation PID, which indicates the next byte is a PID in the range of 256 to 511.

The PID's are arranged in an order, single byte data PID's run from 0 to 128. Double byte PIDs run from 128 to 191, and variable byte parameters run above this. This is all modulo 256, and a PID of 255 indicates an extension PID, and the next byte indicates the PID. It can be extended 3 times to give PID values up to 1024.

I don't know how Silverleaf expects you to do this, but I would assume you need to chose a PID that does not get sent in your vehicle. In that case I would chose something like 180, which is normally trailer weight, but would be a two-byte data value.

PS: Are you looking for actual speed, or the fact that you're on high or low setting. PID 26 is already defined as "Estimated Percent Fan Speed", but expects a percentage value, so it is a single byte value. Never-mind, I see from your example that you are going to send the actual RPM, so a two byte data PID is more appropriate.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 02-27-2013, 03:46
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 02-27-2013, 10:17
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 02-27-2013, 19:58
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 02-27-2013, 20:41
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 02-27-2013, 10:31
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 03-01-2013, 04:37
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 02-27-2013, 11:11
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 02-27-2013, 11:16
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 02-27-2013, 13:46
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Itchintogo - 02-27-2013, 14:23
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - pgchin - 02-27-2013, 15:21
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-01-2013, 12:23
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 03-04-2013, 22:33
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-04-2013, 19:16
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-04-2013, 20:04
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 03-07-2013, 04:27
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-04-2013, 20:28
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-04-2013, 22:01
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-04-2013, 22:27
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-05-2013, 20:10
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 03-06-2013, 10:42
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 03-04-2013, 23:15
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - nedb - 03-04-2013, 23:55
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Arcticdude - 03-05-2013, 00:13
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-05-2013, 21:48
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-05-2013, 22:50
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-06-2013, 10:57
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-07-2013, 15:17
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-08-2013, 13:49
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-09-2013, 12:23
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-09-2013, 14:40
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-09-2013, 18:30
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - davidbrady - 03-12-2013, 10:46
RE: CAT 3208 monitoring - Ray Davis - 03-12-2013 11:22



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)