Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's?
03-04-2006, 05:50
Post: #4
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's?
Andy:

The roof on the 80's Birds are already a good platform as is. These is a
double diamond plate that covers the roof, and there is a railing
installed, though a short one.

Not sure but you might take a look at Traveller ( coach name) it is a FC
and a good Coach and well maintained.

Ralph

At 05:40 PM 3/4/2006 +0000, you wrote:
>Hello Ralph,
>
>Thanks for clearing that up! The FC will work best for me.
>
>Might you know the height of the FC to the top of the roof (not at the
>hightest point on the AC)? That is obviously where the floor of my
>roof platform will begin.
>
>I guess I'll also be looking for a FC with central air conditioning so
>I don't have to worry about roof AC's getting in the way.
>
>Does anybody know if the 1987 - 89 FC units had central AC as an
>option? I know that they were available in the mid 80's - not sure
>about after the 87' re-design.
>
>Thanks again for being so helpful!
>
>Andy Coleman (future FC-35 buyer)
>
>--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph L. Fullenwider"
> wrote:
> >
> > Andy:
> >
> > The Fc's are aprox one foot lower than the PT's. My FC was 10' 2"
>clearance
> >
> > Safe travels,
> >
> > Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider
> > Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma
> > http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm
> >
> > At 04:13 PM 3/4/2006 +0000, you wrote:
> > >Hello Travelodge'rs!
> > >
> > >Is there a height (overall clearance) difference between the mid 80's
> > >forward control and pusher units?
> > >
> > >As I posted earlier, I'm hoping to buy a Wanderlodge that I can
> > >construct a roof platform on. Because it has the body of an
> > >All-American school bus, the Wanderlodge has to be the best rv to
> > >build a platform on!
> > >
> > >I'm worried about clearance under bridges however. I hope to stay
> > >under 12' 6" in height, hopefully with a 2' railing.
> > >
> > >So every inch counts.
> > >
> > > From looking at all the great info on this Forum, it looks like the
> > >top of the wheel wells in the FC protrude into the interior. It also
> > >looks like the floor of the PT does not - as the underbelly storage
> > >boxes seem much larger.
> > >
> > >Does anybody know if there is a difference? Even if it is just 6"
>or 1'?
> > >
> > >Thanks everyone! Much appreciated!
> > >
> > >Andy Coleman
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Safe travels,

Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider
Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma
http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 04:13
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 03-04-2006, 04:33
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 05:40
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 03-04-2006 05:50
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - mbulriss - 03-04-2006, 06:00
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - erniecarpet@... - 03-04-2006, 06:46
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 07:19



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)