Height Difference Between FC's and PT's?
|
03-04-2006, 05:50
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's?
Andy:
The roof on the 80's Birds are already a good platform as is. These is a double diamond plate that covers the roof, and there is a railing installed, though a short one. Not sure but you might take a look at Traveller ( coach name) it is a FC and a good Coach and well maintained. Ralph At 05:40 PM 3/4/2006 +0000, you wrote: >Hello Ralph, > >Thanks for clearing that up! The FC will work best for me. > >Might you know the height of the FC to the top of the roof (not at the >hightest point on the AC)? That is obviously where the floor of my >roof platform will begin. > >I guess I'll also be looking for a FC with central air conditioning so >I don't have to worry about roof AC's getting in the way. > >Does anybody know if the 1987 - 89 FC units had central AC as an >option? I know that they were available in the mid 80's - not sure >about after the 87' re-design. > >Thanks again for being so helpful! > >Andy Coleman (future FC-35 buyer) > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Ralph L. Fullenwider" > > > > > Andy: > > > > The Fc's are aprox one foot lower than the PT's. My FC was 10' 2" >clearance > > > > Safe travels, > > > > Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider > > Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma > > http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm > > > > At 04:13 PM 3/4/2006 +0000, you wrote: > > >Hello Travelodge'rs! > > > > > >Is there a height (overall clearance) difference between the mid 80's > > >forward control and pusher units? > > > > > >As I posted earlier, I'm hoping to buy a Wanderlodge that I can > > >construct a roof platform on. Because it has the body of an > > >All-American school bus, the Wanderlodge has to be the best rv to > > >build a platform on! > > > > > >I'm worried about clearance under bridges however. I hope to stay > > >under 12' 6" in height, hopefully with a 2' railing. > > > > > >So every inch counts. > > > > > > From looking at all the great info on this Forum, it looks like the > > >top of the wheel wells in the FC protrude into the interior. It also > > >looks like the floor of the PT does not - as the underbelly storage > > >boxes seem much larger. > > > > > >Does anybody know if there is a difference? Even if it is just 6" >or 1'? > > > > > >Thanks everyone! Much appreciated! > > > > > >Andy Coleman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Safe travels, Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider Ralph's RV Solutions, Duncan, Oklahoma http://home.swbell.net/rlf47/index.htm |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 04:13
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 03-04-2006, 04:33
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 05:40
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 03-04-2006 05:50
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - mbulriss - 03-04-2006, 06:00
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - erniecarpet@... - 03-04-2006, 06:46
Height Difference Between FC's and PT's? - Andy Coleman - 03-04-2006, 07:19
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)