Replacing the TVs
|
11-04-2008, 02:17
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Brad,
You do NOT have to replace your antenna. Digital TV is being broadcast on the UHF bands and all TV antennae work just fine, if they work now. Yes there are "better" HD TV antennae with more elements and better amps, but you DON'T need them. Paul --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, brad barton <bbartonwx@...> wrote: > > FYI, If you don't use satellite or over-the-air TV, preferring park cable when plugged in, I don't believe you have to change anything. > To make your existing satellite TV work properly, you'll need a converter box. And if you want all digital HD satellite, you'll need a new antenna and receiver. > Fortunately, we don't watch much TV on the road. Brad Barton 00LXiDFW bbartonwx@... > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@...: spambate@...: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:28:10 +0000Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Replacing the TVs > > > > > Wallace,You are correct, the converter boxes will work, but....Where are you going to put the converter box so you can use the remote?Where are you going to put the box in the bedroom?Going to digital TV will just make life easier.Paul--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Wallace Craig converter box will obviate thenecessity to change out the TV set. Unless of course we are justlooking for a reason to get a digital TV.> > > Wallace Craig> 95 WLWB 42> Azle, Texas> > --- On Mon, 11/3/08, p_a_lazar [WanderlodgeForum] Replacing the TVs> To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 3:37 PM> > With February rapidly approaching, thoughts run to the work involved> in replacing the TVs for digital models.> > I would think we can negotiate a better price to have the work> performed "someplace" or "someplaces".> > I have seen a really nice "conversion" done by Coachcraft by McDonald> (sp) outside Atlanta. The coach I saw had the TV relocated to the> center of the front overhead and the electronics moved to the driver's> side overhead. The storage/electronics areas had black smoked> glass/Lexan which allows IR (remote control) to operate and matches> the face of the LCD TV. Looked VERY good.> > I know some have already done their own or paid others or are like me> and watching time running out.> > If you have seen good conversions, please share the info here or much> better would be photos of completed jobs so we can all get ideas etc.> > I'm actually willing to negotiate group work if others are interested.> I plan on having my coach done sometime in January to allow me time to> decide on what and where.> __________________> This opinion or advice is worth what you paid for it > > Paul LaZar> Silver Spring, MD> 97 wb43> > > > ------------------------------------> > Yahoo! Groups Links> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > When your life is on the goâtake your life with you. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/ > |
|||
11-04-2008, 03:00
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Hi Paul,
There have been several posts on various forums about members doing new TV's, some "built in" and some on "swing arms" that lay flat to the old overhead console, I have reviewed them all....beautiful work and wonderful ideas. pts, wbs, etc. The thing the tripped me up was the design of "our coaches" overhead with tv in the corner....saw a "friends of birds" conversion 2 years ago of a 97 42, redid the corner cabinet with smoked Plexiglas and moved the components there , major overhead surgery installed the flat panel in the right corner "in the overhead", had a hinged panel on the bottom and you had to remove the TV to get at the right overhead fuses, etc......... Beautiful and expensive but his " priority" design point was" "built in". Got bored on the road the past 5 months and my priority design point was no major surgery, when tv removed looks "stock" as I take the coach "offline" and do not leave them in the coach when I am home. They also generate a fair amount of heat and wanted airflow. Biggest design point "freakin cheap".Stole and modified an idea from Don Brander's post(thanks Don for the inspiration)". Bought a sharp 32 incher and a "swingarm" mount" from the local Wally world on the road as they were running a sale. Took the left door off the "right hand" 2 door cabinet where the fuse/ relay access is and installed the mount on the "upward beam partition". The mount allows the TV to "slip onto it and 1 thumb screw" When the tv is off, the mount rests inside the cabinet and you can put the left door back on the hinge base and OEM with "2 snaps" per the design of the hinge. MOunt does wire management inside of it.....neat, clean....... Left the center cabinet electronics there as the swing arm moves the tv around side to side, up and down, and with it as close to flat as possible position (parked), you can still get the left door open to work the "box, cd, DVD, player, etc. Stuff is old anyway and will get upgraded one day......... Took off the TV framing on the corner, went to the local box store and got some molding, 1/8' plywood.Framed the corner cabinet out to make a component area now vacant from the old TV and painted everything black to match the TV and dash panel. Framed it out with new molding and painted it black to match TV and dash also. Ordered 1/4" smoked plexiglass online and brass hinges and magnetic locks to match the "wine glass" cabinet hardware. Mounted the satellite receiver and a couple of other new "IR" toys in there, actually mounted the digital converter for the back TV in there..........works great with doors closed through the smoked plexiglass. Utilizing the "srew mounts" from the base of the TV where the stand sips in, got a pice of aluminum from box store, formed it into 2 pieces...... 1 screwed the the cabiniet inside with door off for the mount, other to 1 screw in the TV where the base it would be if you put it on a stand. They "mate" with a srew and wingnut" so I can "park" the TV while traveling and it stays locked against the overhead cabinet..... no movement Upside: - cheap - 60 for the plexiglass and hardware including shipping - 20 for the box tore stuff including paint - dont have to move anything and a new cool cabinet for additional toy expansion - easier access to the fuse /relay panel - updated looking overhead - easy to remove - can hook up the PC if I wanted to Downside: - TV is NOT built in so it sticks out about 3 inches across the front cabinet....coach access is not hindered but you do need to be aware and does not look as cool as "built in" like some of the members setups. - yeah got to get out of bed and aim the IR remote to the cabinet to change the channel in the back while the old TV is still in but will fix this next year OTR. Next years over the road project will be to replace the rear TV and build a cabinet in the back......stealing and idea from an SOB forum...using a piano hinde and building a tv and "face" into the space but the whole thing flips up on air struts. Framing out behind for additional storage........yes I get bored on the road with work, site seeing, etc.....need to keep busy, and have 2 new struts from an old project I need to find a use for....... later Pete, Donna, and Lucky Bear Chin 95 42' Daytona Beach, FL --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Pete Masterson wrote: > > The converter box will make the TV continue to work... but the box > replaces the TV tuner (you set the TV to channel 3 or 4 like for a > VCR) and you use the remote for the box. In an RV, that suggests some > mounting issues. In my 'bird, getting to the back of the existing TV > to hook up the converter) is going to be a hassle (at the very least) > and then, where do I put the box? Also, how do I integrate the > (traditional signal) cable and (digital signal) antenna. From a > practical standpoint, the converter box ought to go up front where > the selector box sits. But then, the remote, which requires line of > sight, won't work with the bedroom TV (where I generally watch most > of my TV). > > The advantage of replacing the tube-TV with a digital LCD panel is > reduced weight, possibly larger screen size in the same area, and > (naturally) digital signal capability (to say nothing about HD > performance). So, the issue isn't as straight forward as it may seem > at first. > > Pete Masterson > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 > aeonix1@... > On the road at Buffalo, TX > > > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Wallace Craig wrote: > > > It is my understanding that a converter box will obviate the > > necessity to change out the TV set. Unless of course we are just > > looking for a reason to get a digital TV. > > > > Wallace Craig > > 95 WLWB 42 > > Azle, Texas > |
|||
11-04-2008, 03:45
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
I have a question for anyone that has replaced their TV with a flat
screen. While in Branson looking at the new coach, I ask Rick why the big flat screen does not fold up flat against the ceiling. Which was my plan so I could install a larger TV but still use the side cabinets. Rick said that BlueBird had experienced very bad luck with flat screens riding down the road in the horizontal laying down position. He said the flat units can not take any shaking in that position. I don't understand how solid-state electronics would make any difference what position they are riding. What experience have you had? Larry Kehler 94 PT40 WBDA "BAM" At home in St Louis |
|||
11-04-2008, 04:14
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Larry I installed a 32" Sharp in my 94. One homemade bracket that slips into the original TV hole. TV sits mostly outside the hole but there is no access problem to the two door cabinets on either side. I have a pic or two if you want me to send them to your PM
2008/11/4 Larry Kehler <"llkehler@gmail.com">
-- Rob, Sue & Merlin Robinson 94 WLWB |
|||
11-04-2008, 04:16
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Rob,
Please send me the pictures. I believe you have my email address. Thanks, On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rob Robinson <"wander.rob@gmail.com"> wrote:
-- Curt Sprenger 1987 PT38 8V92 "MacAttack Racing" Anaheim Hills, CA |
|||
11-04-2008, 05:34
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
rob, send that pix to me too
|
|||
11-04-2008, 07:04
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Thanks, Paul. I'll stick to radio from now on.
BradBarton00LXiDFW bbartonwx@... To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com From: spambate@... Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:17:40 +0000 Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Replacing the TVs
Brad, You do NOT have to replace your antenna. Digital TV is being broadcast on the UHF bands and all TV antennae work just fine, if they work now. Yes there are "better" HD TV antennae with more elements and better amps, but you DON'T need them. Paul --- In "WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com", brad barton <bbartonwx@.<WBR>..> wrote: > > FYI, If you don't use satellite or over-the-air TV, preferring park cable when plugged in, I don't believe you have to change anything. > To make your existing satellite TV work properly, you'll need a converter box. And if you want all digital HD satellite, you'll need a new antenna and receiver. > Fortunately, we don't watch much TV on the road. Brad Barton 00LXiDFW bbartonwx@.. > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@ +0000Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Replacing the TVs > > > > > Wallace,You are correct, the converter boxes will work, but....Where are you going to put the converter box so you can use the remote?Where are you going to put the box in the bedroom?Going to digital TV will just make life easier.Paul- Wallace Craig converter box will obviate thenecessity to change out the TV set. Unless of course we are justlooking for a reason to get a digital TV.> > > Wallace Craig> 95 WLWB 42> Azle, Texas> > --- On Mon, 11/3/08, p_a_lazar [WanderlodgeForum] Replacing the TVs> To: "WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com"> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 3:37 PM> > With February rapidly approaching, thoughts run to the work involved> in replacing the TVs for digital models.> > I would think we can negotiate a better price to have the work> performed "someplace" or "someplaces" Coachcraft by McDonald> (sp) outside Atlanta. The coach I saw had the TV relocated to the> center of the front overhead and the electronics moved to the driver's> side overhead. The storage/electronics areas had black smoked> glass/Lexan which allows IR (remote control) to operate and matches> the face of the LCD TV. Looked VERY good.> > I know some have already done their own or paid others or are like me> and watching time running out.> > If you have seen good conversions, please share the info here or much> better would be photos of completed jobs so we can all get ideas etc.> > I'm actually willing to negotiate group work if others are interested.> I plan on having my coach done sometime in January to allow me time to> decide on what and where.> ____________ paid for it > > Paul LaZar> Silver Spring, MD> 97 wb43> > > > ------------ > > > > > > ____________ > When your life is on the goâtake your life with you. > http://clk.atdmt. > When your life is on the goâtake your life with you. Try Windows Mobile® today |
|||
11-04-2008, 08:25
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
Larry, I think it might be that the frame suports the crystal and
there is nothing to hold up the center as by design the bottom frame takes the stress. I noticed that the boxes they come packed in warn not to be stacked on 'the flat' upside down and sideways was ok. I kept my flatscreen at 32 inches in fear that a larger screen would lack suport for the center crystal. I mounted my tv behind the cabinet frame to keep it out of the stairwell traffic and not to have the cabinet face dictate the view angle. The screen is way east to crack and crystal replacement is not cost feesable Greg94ptCa --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Larry Kehler" > > I have a question for anyone that has replaced their TV with a flat > screen. While in Branson looking at the new coach, I ask Rick why the > big flat screen does not fold up flat against the ceiling. Which was > my plan so I could install a larger TV but still use the side > cabinets. Rick said that BlueBird had experienced very bad luck with > flat screens riding down the road in the horizontal laying down > position. He said the flat units can not take any shaking in that > position. > I don't understand how solid-state electronics would make any > difference what position they are riding. > What experience have you had? > > Larry Kehler > 94 PT40 WBDA "BAM" > At home in St Louis > |
|||
11-04-2008, 09:05
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
I don't think it's the electronics. It's the glass... The flat screen
is, basically, a sheet of glass with electronics coated onto it. Glass does not travel well laid flat. I travel with dual 24" computer screens. I've had no problems with them due to vibration, etc. They are on a fixed mounting system, and since they're (designed to be) very close together, I slip a cushion between them (while on the road) to keep them for banging each other. Pete Masterson '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 aeonix1@... On the road at Lockhart, TX On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Larry Kehler wrote: > I have a question for anyone that has replaced their TV with a flat > screen. While in Branson looking at the new coach, I ask Rick why the > big flat screen does not fold up flat against the ceiling. Which was > my plan so I could install a larger TV but still use the side > cabinets. Rick said that BlueBird had experienced very bad luck with > flat screens riding down the road in the horizontal laying down > position. He said the flat units can not take any shaking in that > position. > I don't understand how solid-state electronics would make any > difference what position they are riding. > What experience have you had? > |
|||
11-04-2008, 11:01
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
Replacing the TVs
We have an 84 PT36.
I mounted our LCD on our dash with the wall mount bracket. I have the bracket mounted on the flat dash and prop the tv up when stopped. It lays flat when traveling. I found a wood inbed breakfast table that I place over it for travel. Keeps the cats from walking on the tv. We have had this arrangement for 2 years now. So far, no problem with tv. Bob Lawrence 84 PT36 Fulltiming-presently in Shawnee, Ok. > I have a question for anyone that has replaced their TV with a flat > screen. While in Branson looking at the new coach, I ask Rick why the > big flat screen does not fold up flat against the ceiling. Which was > my plan so I could install a larger TV but still use the side > cabinets. Rick said that BlueBird had experienced very bad luck with > flat screens riding down the road in the horizontal laying down > position. He said the flat units can not take any shaking in that > position. > I don't understand how solid-state electronics would make any > difference what position they are riding. > What experience have you had? > > Larry Kehler > 94 PT40 WBDA "BAM" > At home in St Louis > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)