6" SS EXHAUST STACK
|
10-31-2008, 09:14
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
David,
I think your muffler is 6" inlet & out your pipes from the turbo to the muffler are 5" Kurt Horvath 95 PT 42 10AC --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady wrote: > > The LXi, like your WB, uses a 6 inch muffler. Five inch will > certainly suck some ponies away. > > David Brady > '02 LXi, NC > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > > > > Yea I've heard that but the one with the liner has fixed the high > > pressure leaks according to the Mfg. Let's hope. Prevost has from > > what I recall pipes bent in one piece, they are held together with > > those nifty band clamps that seat and conform to the pipe exterior, > > If the V-Bands and Flanges don't work out I'll go to those pipe > > clamps. The Flanges are also available with three different types of > > gaskets, o-ring, flat, and, and, and I can't remember, oh yea the > > type I bought, male-female flanges, perfect alignment, leak free, > > again according to Vibrant Mfg. There is also a Stainless Steel > > Muffler available that may work well on your coach, but it's inlet > > outlet is 5" not the 6" like on your coach. well I assume yours is > > 6"??? Also it is 10" in diameter which would help with crowed exhaust > > tunnel. > > > > Kurt Horvath > > 95 Pt 42 > > 10AC > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > > > No thanks, I already have a stock muffler. Thanks for the links, > > > there's some pretty nifty items there. Be careful with those fancy > > > braided stainless steel pieces. They look sharp, but they've always > > > leaked on my turbocharged subaru wrx. Kurt, you've been around > > > a few over-the-road coaches, Prevost' and what not, what do they > > > run on their exhaust systems; i.e., expansion pipes, flex pipe, etc. > > > > > > David Brady > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > > > > David, Would you like to take that brand new muffler off my > > hands??? > > > > > > > > According to DD straight pipe & ECU will not have any issues in > > the > > > > 95 vintage S 60. > > > > > > > > OEM built that pipe for BB ACAP - As Cheep As Possible - > > > > > > > > The original routing of the pipe leaves the turbo, source of the > > > > first failure, cracked the 1st 90 degree turn a short straight run > > > > 2nd. 90 degree turn, then into a double ball connector that also > > > > telescopes in and out. You can check out that piece of S---, sorry > > > > engineering wonder here. > > > > > > > > http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > 89.pdf > > > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > 89.pdf> > > > > > > > > Page 76 Double Ball Joint with Slip Joint Feature Allowing Lateral > > > > Movement length 16 to 18 inches mine measures 14 .55 inches at > > > > present. This marvel allows for 10 degrees of angularity 360 > > degree > > > > rotation 2" of offset 2" axial movement,. Hell the u joints can't > > > > move around that much. Besides it was hard clamped to the mount > > from > > > > the engine in front of this connection not to mention rusted to > > the > > > > point that it took an pneumatic impact chisel to get it apart.. So > > > > what's the point. You need flex in between the turbo and the first > > > > mount. > > > > > > > > The Flex Connector with liner I choose is here at > > > > > > > > http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?> > > > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?>> > > > > > > cPath=1022_1035_1064_1114&products_id=1008&osCsid=999d7ef5fdd15864bae3 > > > > 3db41abf5ef9 > > > > > > > > The 2 90 degree turns were fabricated in that manner because it's > > not > > > > easy to bend large diameter pipe in a single 180 degree bend, thus > > > > they weld 2 90's together, which is the industry standard for > > > > manufacturing a 180 degree turn in large pipe exhausts. Well this > > > > ain't the factory and we're not constrained by what is easy. I > > have > > > > acquired a 14ga 180 degree U-Tube that has the same external > > > > dimensions as the original pipe. I'm not an engineer but I > > reasonably > > > > certain that with the remaining 90 degree bend and a 45 degree > > bend > > > > there will be sufficient back pressure. > > > > > > > > There will also be a flexible pipe hanger mount behind the Flex > > > > connector mounted on the ceiling of the engine compartment that > > will > > > > support the middle section of pipe and will allow for any movement > > > > and or torque that may be transferred to the pipe by the motor. > > The > > > > original clamps for the muffler have to go as they are 6" but the > > > > rubber isolated mounting bars will remain and that's all that was > > > > there to begin with. So where's the rub? Bub! > > > > > > > > Not to take anything away from the engineers that designed the > > Bird, > > > > But there are some glaring deficiencies. 7 way trailer plug, Air > > > > Purge System, Watts valve, Accelerator and Brake peddles, Front > > Left > > > > Shock Mount, Relay for Jake Brake, W/D Vent for Slendide 2000, > > > > Installation of Refrigerator with inadequate convection, The seat > > > > belts mounted to floor instead of the seat, That reminds me I > > still > > > > have to fix that one. Nothing like hitting a road transition just > > to > > > > have the air ride seat bounce and the seat belts automatically > > adjust > > > > for the slack then the air ride seat rebounds and the belts try to > > > > cut you in half at the waist. That's just the 95 PT 42. I'm not > > > > bitchin! I'm fixin > > > > > > > > Kurt Horvath > > > > 95 PT 42 > > > > 10AC > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Greg. I'm gonna keep mine stock. There's a bunch > > > > > of vibration and movement back there. I figure BB's been > > building > > > > > buses a whole lot longer than I have. Initially I'd scratch my > > > > > head when looking at the frame and support pieces, but when > > > > > you consider that something as big as a bus must twist and flex, > > > > > this flexibility needs to be designed in. Make one piece > > stronger > > > > > and you've created a stress raiser someplace else. > > > > > > > > > > I have a friend who transplanted a honda v-tech motor into a > > > > > lotus elise. Everything worked but the alternator mount. The > > mount > > > > > insists on cracking. There can be some weird harmonics and > > > > > resonant frequencies going on that are difficult to grasp and > > > > > only trial and error and a 50 year track record of building > > buses > > > > > can solve (unless you can model it and run high powered > > > > > computer finite element analysis on it). He's still fighting > > that > > > > > mount... > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I'm off my soap box. > > > > > > > > > > David Brady > > > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > > > > > Gregory OConnor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, try and figure why there were 4 bends. it may be that > > it was > > > > > > engineered to alow for swing room between the 'hung exhaust' > > and > > > > > > the 'torque reaction of the ruber mounted detroit'. look at > > the > > > > roll > > > > > > of the torque and see that there is a place for the movement > > to > > > > twist > > > > > > a union. I kinda think this movement was the problem with the > > > > > > resulting crack. crack=result ;movement=cause ;facilitate > > movement > > > > > > =repair. may be that BB enginered it correct but someone > > > > > > overtightened a band to cure an exhaust leak??????? you also > > got > > > > to > > > > > > keep the stack from cantilivering off of the maniford with > > your > > > > new > > > > > > design. Scavenging is one variable in fuel efficiency. even > > > > straight > > > > > > pipes some time will result in lower fuel economy because the > > > > intake > > > > > > variable get screwd. backpressure is mathed into the computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release > > Date: > > > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > ------ > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > |
|||
10-31-2008, 12:42
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
I went to 5" muffler on my 8V92 last year. Have not noticed any
change in performance. My logic is the fact that 5" is the outlet from the turbo. Besides that, 5" is the common exhaust on most of the over the road rigs today. There are exceptions, but I don't see any advantage to 6" with the turbo outlet restricted to 5" R.E. (Ron) Marabito, Dallas, TX 92WB40 --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady > > The LXi, like your WB, uses a 6 inch muffler. Five inch will > certainly suck some ponies away. > > David Brady > '02 LXi, NC > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > > > > Yea I've heard that but the one with the liner has fixed the high > > pressure leaks according to the Mfg. Let's hope. Prevost has from > > what I recall pipes bent in one piece, they are held together with > > those nifty band clamps that seat and conform to the pipe exterior, > > If the V-Bands and Flanges don't work out I'll go to those pipe > > clamps. The Flanges are also available with three different types of > > gaskets, o-ring, flat, and, and, and I can't remember, oh yea the > > type I bought, male-female flanges, perfect alignment, leak free, > > again according to Vibrant Mfg. There is also a Stainless Steel > > Muffler available that may work well on your coach, but it's inlet > > outlet is 5" not the 6" like on your coach. well I assume yours is > > 6"??? Also it is 10" in diameter which would help with crowed exhaust > > tunnel. > > > > Kurt Horvath > > 95 Pt 42 > > 10AC > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > > > No thanks, I already have a stock muffler. Thanks for the links, > > > there's some pretty nifty items there. Be careful with those fancy > > > braided stainless steel pieces. They look sharp, but they've always > > > leaked on my turbocharged subaru wrx. Kurt, you've been around > > > a few over-the-road coaches, Prevost' and what not, what do they > > > run on their exhaust systems; i.e., expansion pipes, flex pipe, etc. > > > > > > David Brady > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > > > > David, Would you like to take that brand new muffler off my > > hands??? > > > > > > > > According to DD straight pipe & ECU will not have any issues in > > the > > > > 95 vintage S 60. > > > > > > > > OEM built that pipe for BB ACAP - As Cheep As Possible - > > > > > > > > The original routing of the pipe leaves the turbo, source of the > > > > first failure, cracked the 1st 90 degree turn a short straight run > > > > 2nd. 90 degree turn, then into a double ball connector that also > > > > telescopes in and out. You can check out that piece of S---, sorry > > > > engineering wonder here. > > > > > > > > http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > 89.pdf > > > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > 89.pdf> > > > > > > > > Page 76 Double Ball Joint with Slip Joint Feature Allowing Lateral > > > > Movement length 16 to 18 inches mine measures 14 .55 inches at > > > > present. This marvel allows for 10 degrees of angularity 360 > > degree > > > > rotation 2" of offset 2" axial movement,. Hell the u joints can't > > > > move around that much. Besides it was hard clamped to the mount > > from > > > > the engine in front of this connection not to mention rusted to > > the > > > > point that it took an pneumatic impact chisel to get it apart.. So > > > > what's the point. You need flex in between the turbo and the first > > > > mount. > > > > > > > > The Flex Connector with liner I choose is here at > > > > > > > > http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?> > > > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?>> > > > > > > cPath=1022_1035_1064_1114&products_id=1008&osCsid=999d7ef5fdd15864bae3 > > > > 3db41abf5ef9 > > > > > > > > The 2 90 degree turns were fabricated in that manner because it's > > not > > > > easy to bend large diameter pipe in a single 180 degree bend, thus > > > > they weld 2 90's together, which is the industry standard for > > > > manufacturing a 180 degree turn in large pipe exhausts. Well this > > > > ain't the factory and we're not constrained by what is easy. I > > have > > > > acquired a 14ga 180 degree U-Tube that has the same external > > > > dimensions as the original pipe. I'm not an engineer but I > > reasonably > > > > certain that with the remaining 90 degree bend and a 45 degree > > bend > > > > there will be sufficient back pressure. > > > > > > > > There will also be a flexible pipe hanger mount behind the Flex > > > > connector mounted on the ceiling of the engine compartment that > > will > > > > support the middle section of pipe and will allow for any movement > > > > and or torque that may be transferred to the pipe by the motor. > > The > > > > original clamps for the muffler have to go as they are 6" but the > > > > rubber isolated mounting bars will remain and that's all that was > > > > there to begin with. So where's the rub? Bub! > > > > > > > > Not to take anything away from the engineers that designed the > > Bird, > > > > But there are some glaring deficiencies. 7 way trailer plug, Air > > > > Purge System, Watts valve, Accelerator and Brake peddles, Front > > Left > > > > Shock Mount, Relay for Jake Brake, W/D Vent for Slendide 2000, > > > > Installation of Refrigerator with inadequate convection, The seat > > > > belts mounted to floor instead of the seat, That reminds me I > > still > > > > have to fix that one. Nothing like hitting a road transition just > > to > > > > have the air ride seat bounce and the seat belts automatically > > adjust > > > > for the slack then the air ride seat rebounds and the belts try to > > > > cut you in half at the waist. That's just the 95 PT 42. I'm not > > > > bitchin! I'm fixin > > > > > > > > Kurt Horvath > > > > 95 PT 42 > > > > 10AC > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Greg. I'm gonna keep mine stock. There's a bunch > > > > > of vibration and movement back there. I figure BB's been > > building > > > > > buses a whole lot longer than I have. Initially I'd scratch my > > > > > head when looking at the frame and support pieces, but when > > > > > you consider that something as big as a bus must twist and flex, > > > > > this flexibility needs to be designed in. Make one piece > > stronger > > > > > and you've created a stress raiser someplace else. > > > > > > > > > > I have a friend who transplanted a honda v-tech motor into a > > > > > lotus elise. Everything worked but the alternator mount. The > > mount > > > > > insists on cracking. There can be some weird harmonics and > > > > > resonant frequencies going on that are difficult to grasp and > > > > > only trial and error and a 50 year track record of building > > buses > > > > > can solve (unless you can model it and run high powered > > > > > computer finite element analysis on it). He's still fighting > > that > > > > > mount... > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I'm off my soap box. > > > > > > > > > > David Brady > > > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > > > > > Gregory OConnor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, try and figure why there were 4 bends. it may be that > > it was > > > > > > engineered to alow for swing room between the 'hung exhaust' > > and > > > > > > the 'torque reaction of the ruber mounted detroit'. look at > > the > > > > roll > > > > > > of the torque and see that there is a place for the movement > > to > > > > twist > > > > > > a union. I kinda think this movement was the problem with the > > > > > > resulting crack. crack=result ;movement=cause ;facilitate > > movement > > > > > > =repair. may be that BB enginered it correct but someone > > > > > > overtightened a band to cure an exhaust leak??????? you also > > got > > > > to > > > > > > keep the stack from cantilivering off of the maniford with > > your > > > > new > > > > > > design. Scavenging is one variable in fuel efficiency. even > > > > straight > > > > > > pipes some time will result in lower fuel economy because the > > > > intake > > > > > > variable get screwd. backpressure is mathed into the computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release > > Date: > > > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > ------ > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > |
|||
10-31-2008, 14:05
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
That's correct. David Brady '02 LXi, NC Kurt Horvath wrote:
|
|||
10-31-2008, 14:30
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
In other words, it was slow with the 6" and its still slow with the 5". Climb a six percent grade before and after, or put it on a dyno. I'll have to dig out my fluid flow equations to let you know what the real restrictions are. Coming out of the turbo with a narrow pipe should increase velocities due to the Bernoulli principle, but shortly thereafter you really want to dump it to a wide low back- pressure exhaust. Without benchmarks it's hard to tell what power loss you've sustained. David Brady '02 LXi, NC ronmarabito2002 wrote:
|
|||
10-31-2008, 17:24
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
David,
A few days ago you were all for a straight pipe. Now we have delved into the effects and merits of the, "Bernoulli effect" it presumes that the density of the flowing gas is constant, which will not necessarily be true in this application. If this were a consideration and a factor in design and function wouldn't this be a standard application on all exhausts, considering today's drive for better performance Vs energy expended Vs particulate matter expelled Vs whatever else the EPA thinks we should be ejecting from our exhaust pipes? One factor you may have not considered are the exhaust blankets I mentioned. They will retain the heat within the pipes thus increasing the velocity of the exhaust creating an accelerated flow of gasses through the tubes. If I may present another observation, 5" exhaust systems are the standard on all production class 8 trucks. Furthermore and for the heck of it I don't believe that the trucker that has 8" stacks on his rig has considered the, "Bernoulli effect" in his choice at the Chrome Shop. Although it mat have an effect on performance further than just looking cool. They do look good, no doubt. For the last four weeks I have queried Detroit Diesel, Custom Exhaust Fabricators, Several OEM Exhaust Mfg.'s, Marine Exhaust Engineers & Fabricators, My BB Guru, and anyone else that would lend an ear, and no one has expressed any apprehension or regard in the respect to a 5" exhaust system. In fact all parties expressed their surprise in respect as to why the system would change size at the muffler. Several owners have modified their systems to 5" from end to end, and have seen no change in performance. Positive or negative, In general it was just a matter of convenience in acquiring parts, I won't get into that. That has recently been beaten to death at the expense of all parties involved If there is someone who would like to further this debate with Imperical evidence of the merits of, or placing a venturi somewhere in this exhaust system I have pasted a site below where you can formulate your calculations. I would love to see some evidence of a positive effect, in which case I would have no problem in adding a venturi crimp in the exhaust system. Bernoulli Calculation http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hba...r.html#beq The calculation of the "real world" pressure in a constriction of a tube is difficult to do because of viscous losses, turbulence, and the assumptions which must be made about the velocity profile (which affect the calculated kinetic energy). The model calculation here assumes laminar flow (no turbulence), assumes that the distance from the larger diameter to the smaller is short enough that viscous losses can be neglected, and assumes that the velocity profile follows that of theoretical laminar flow. Specifically, this involves assuming that the effective flow velocity is one half of the maximum velocity, and that the average kinetic energy density is given by one third of the maximum kinetic energy density. Now if you can swallow all those assumptions, you can model* the flow in a tube where the volume flow rate is = cm3/s and the fluid density is ñ = gm/cm3. For an inlet tube area A1= cm2 (radius r1 =cm), the geometry of flow leads to an effective fluid velocity of v1 =cm/s. Since the Bernoulli equation includes the fluid potential energy as well, the height of the inlet tube is specified as h1 = cm. If the area of the tube is constricted to A2=cm2 (radius r1 = cm), then without any further assumptions the effective fluid velocity in the constriction must be v2 = cm/s. The height of the constricted tube is specified as h2 = cm. The kinetic energy densities at the two locations in the tube can now be calculated, and the Bernoulli equation applied to constrain the process to conserve energy, thus giving a value for the pressure in the constriction. First, specify a pressure in the inlet tube: Inlet pressure = P1 = kPa = lb/in2 = mmHg = atmos. The energy densities can now be calculated. The energy unit for the CGS units used is the erg. Inlet tube energy densities Kinetic energy density = erg/cm3 Potential energy density = erg/cm3 Pressure energy density = erg/cm3 Constricted tube energy densities Kinetic energy density = erg/cm3 Potential energy density = erg/cm3 Pressure energy density = erg/cm3 The pressure energy density in the constricted tube can now be finally converted into more conventional pressure units to see the effect of the constricted flow on the fluid pressure: Calculated pressure in constriction = P2= kPa = lb/in2 = mmHg = atmos. This calculation can give some perspective on the energy involved in fluid flow, but it's accuracy is always suspect because of the assumption of laminar flow. For typical inlet conditions, the energy density associated with the pressure will be dominant on the input side; after all, we live at the bottom of an atmospheric sea which contributes a large amount of pressure energy. If a drastic enough reduction in radius is used to yield a pressure in the constriction which is less than atmospheric pressure, there is almost certainly some turbulence involved in the flow into that constriction. Nevertheless, the calculation can show why we can get a significant amount of suction (pressure less than atmospheric) with an "aspirator" on a high pressure faucet. These devices consist of a metal tube of reducing radius with a side tube into the region of constricted radius for suction. *Note: Some default values will be entered for some of the values as you start exploring the calculation. All of them can be changed as a part of your calculation. Kurt Horvath 95 PT 42 10AC > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > No thanks, I already have a stock muffler. Thanks for the links, > > > > > there's some pretty nifty items there. Be careful with those fancy > > > > > braided stainless steel pieces. They look sharp, but they've always > > > > > leaked on my turbocharged subaru wrx. Kurt, you've been around > > > > > a few over-the-road coaches, Prevost' and what not, what do they > > > > > run on their exhaust systems; i.e., expansion pipes, flex pipe, etc. > > > > > > > > > > David Brady > > > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > > > > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > David, Would you like to take that brand new muffler off my > > > > hands??? > > > > > > > > > > > > According to DD straight pipe & ECU will not have any issues in > > > > the > > > > > > 95 vintage S 60. > > > > > > > > > > > > OEM built that pipe for BB ACAP - As Cheep As Possible - > > > > > > > > > > > > The original routing of the pipe leaves the turbo, source of the > > > > > > first failure, cracked the 1st 90 degree turn a short straight run > > > > > > 2nd. 90 degree turn, then into a double ball connector that also > > > > > > telescopes in and out. You can check out that piece of S-- -, sorry > > > > > > engineering wonder here. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70->> > > > > 89.pdf > > > > > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70-> > > > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70- > > <http://www.dynaflexproducts.com/download...g_03_pg70->> > > > > 89.pdf> > > > > > > > > > > > > Page 76 Double Ball Joint with Slip Joint Feature Allowing Lateral > > > > > > Movement length 16 to 18 inches mine measures 14 .55 inches at > > > > > > present. This marvel allows for 10 degrees of angularity 360 > > > > degree > > > > > > rotation 2" of offset 2" axial movement,. Hell the u joints can't > > > > > > move around that much. Besides it was hard clamped to the mount > > > > from > > > > > > the engine in front of this connection not to mention rusted to > > > > the > > > > > > point that it took an pneumatic impact chisel to get it apart.. So > > > > > > what's the point. You need flex in between the turbo and the first > > > > > > mount. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Flex Connector with liner I choose is here at > > > > > > > > > > > > http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?> > > > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?>> > > > > > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?> > > > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php? > > <http://vibrantperformance.com/catalog/product_info.php?>>> > > > > > > > > > > cPath=1022_1035_1064_1114&products_id=1008&osCsid=999d7ef5fdd15864bae3 > > > > > > 3db41abf5ef9 > > > > > > > > > > > > The 2 90 degree turns were fabricated in that manner because it's > > > > not > > > > > > easy to bend large diameter pipe in a single 180 degree bend, thus > > > > > > they weld 2 90's together, which is the industry standard for > > > > > > manufacturing a 180 degree turn in large pipe exhausts. Well this > > > > > > ain't the factory and we're not constrained by what is easy. I > > > > have > > > > > > acquired a 14ga 180 degree U-Tube that has the same external > > > > > > dimensions as the original pipe. I'm not an engineer but I > > > > reasonably > > > > > > certain that with the remaining 90 degree bend and a 45 degree > > > > bend > > > > > > there will be sufficient back pressure. > > > > > > > > > > > > There will also be a flexible pipe hanger mount behind the Flex > > > > > > connector mounted on the ceiling of the engine compartment that > > > > will > > > > > > support the middle section of pipe and will allow for any movement > > > > > > and or torque that may be transferred to the pipe by the motor. > > > > The > > > > > > original clamps for the muffler have to go as they are 6" but the > > > > > > rubber isolated mounting bars will remain and that's all that was > > > > > > there to begin with. So where's the rub? Bub! > > > > > > > > > > > > Not to take anything away from the engineers that designed the > > > > Bird, > > > > > > But there are some glaring deficiencies. 7 way trailer plug, Air > > > > > > Purge System, Watts valve, Accelerator and Brake peddles, Front > > > > Left > > > > > > Shock Mount, Relay for Jake Brake, W/D Vent for Slendide 2000, > > > > > > Installation of Refrigerator with inadequate convection, The seat > > > > > > belts mounted to floor instead of the seat, That reminds me I > > > > still > > > > > > have to fix that one. Nothing like hitting a road transition just > > > > to > > > > > > have the air ride seat bounce and the seat belts automatically > > > > adjust > > > > > > for the slack then the air ride seat rebounds and the belts try to > > > > > > cut you in half at the waist. That's just the 95 PT 42. I'm not > > > > > > bitchin! I'm fixin > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt Horvath > > > > > > 95 PT 42 > > > > > > 10AC > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Greg. I'm gonna keep mine stock. There's a bunch > > > > > > > of vibration and movement back there. I figure BB's been > > > > building > > > > > > > buses a whole lot longer than I have. Initially I'd scratch my > > > > > > > head when looking at the frame and support pieces, but when > > > > > > > you consider that something as big as a bus must twist and flex, > > > > > > > this flexibility needs to be designed in. Make one piece > > > > stronger > > > > > > > and you've created a stress raiser someplace else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a friend who transplanted a honda v-tech motor into a > > > > > > > lotus elise. Everything worked but the alternator mount. The > > > > mount > > > > > > > insists on cracking. There can be some weird harmonics and > > > > > > > resonant frequencies going on that are difficult to grasp and > > > > > > > only trial and error and a 50 year track record of building > > > > buses > > > > > > > can solve (unless you can model it and run high powered > > > > > > > computer finite element analysis on it). He's still fighting > > > > that > > > > > > > mount... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I'm off my soap box. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Brady > > > > > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gregory OConnor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, try and figure why there were 4 bends. it may be that > > > > it was > > > > > > > > engineered to alow for swing room between the 'hung exhaust' > > > > and > > > > > > > > the 'torque reaction of the ruber mounted detroit'. look at > > > > the > > > > > > roll > > > > > > > > of the torque and see that there is a place for the movement > > > > to > > > > > > twist > > > > > > > > a union. I kinda think this movement was the problem with the > > > > > > > > resulting crack. crack=result ;movement=cause ;facilitate > > > > movement > > > > > > > > =repair. may be that BB enginered it correct but someone > > > > > > > > overtightened a band to cure an exhaust leak??????? you also > > > > got > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > keep the stack from cantilivering off of the maniford with > > > > your > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > design. Scavenging is one variable in fuel efficiency. even > > > > > > straight > > > > > > > > pipes some time will result in lower fuel economy because the > > > > > > intake > > > > > > > > variable get screwd. backpressure is mathed into the computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ ---- > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release > > > > Date: > > > > > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: > > > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > |
|||
11-01-2008, 04:18
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
Having recently replaced my muffler (at great expense) -- had I to do
it over again, I'd have switched over to a 5" system from turbo to stack. As others have stated, it's 5" at the turbo outlet and the standard in the heavy truck industry is 5". The only performance difference I notice (between the old blown out muffler and the new one) is that the exhaust-type Jake brake seems to be slightly less effective. Pete Masterson '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 aeonix1@... On the road at Hohenwald, TN (Natchez Trace Parkway) On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Kurt Horvath wrote: > <snip> > For the last four weeks I have queried Detroit Diesel, Custom Exhaust > Fabricators, Several OEM Exhaust Mfg.'s, Marine Exhaust Engineers & > Fabricators, My BB Guru, and anyone else that would lend an ear, and > no one has expressed any apprehension or regard in the respect to a > 5" exhaust system. In fact all parties expressed their surprise in > respect as to why the system would change size at the muffler. > > Several owners have modified their systems to 5" from end to end, and > have seen no change in performance. Positive or negative, In general > it was just a matter of convenience in acquiring parts, I won't get > into that. That has recently been beaten to death at the expense of > all parties involved > |
|||
11-01-2008, 05:33
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
Hi Kurt, I am for hollow unbaffled straight pipes. The Bernoulli effect, or "crimp" is built into the turbocharger. Take a look, every one I've seen has the exhaust tapering to a smaller diameter as it passes the turbine to increase velocities. I'm suggesting that performance may be enhanced by providing a taper from the outlet of the turbo exhaust thru the exhaust system. Our taper is a 5" pipe at going into 6" pipe; that's a surface area of 19.6 sq inches expanding to 28.3 square inches. Basically a horn hanging from the outlet of the exhaust turbo enhancing the flow of gases from the turbo. I'm not surprised the vendors support your desire for a 5" exhaust. The only way to really get at the bottom of this is to try both and dyno both. David Brady '02 LXi, NC Kurt Horvath wrote:
|
|||
11-01-2008, 06:25
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
One pipe from the turbo then splits to two stacks.
Kurt Horvath 95 PT 42 10AC --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady wrote: > > But doesn't the trucking industry run dual exhausts? > > David Brady > '02 LXi, NC > > Pete Masterson wrote: > > > > Having recently replaced my muffler (at great expense) -- had I to do > > it over again, I'd have switched over to a 5" system from turbo to > > stack. As others have stated, it's 5" at the turbo outlet and the > > standard in the heavy truck industry is 5". > > > > The only performance difference I notice (between the old blown out > > muffler and the new one) is that the exhaust-type Jake brake seems to > > be slightly less effective. > > > > Pete Masterson > > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 > > aeonix1@... > > On the road at Hohenwald, TN (Natchez Trace Parkway) > > > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > <snip> > > > For the last four weeks I have queried Detroit Diesel, Custom Exhaust > > > Fabricators, Several OEM Exhaust Mfg.'s, Marine Exhaust Engineers & > > > Fabricators, My BB Guru, and anyone else that would lend an ear, and > > > no one has expressed any apprehension or regard in the respect to a > > > 5" exhaust system. In fact all parties expressed their surprise in > > > respect as to why the system would change size at the muffler. > > > > > > Several owners have modified their systems to 5" from end to end, and > > > have seen no change in performance. Positive or negative, In general > > > it was just a matter of convenience in acquiring parts, I won't get > > > into that. That has recently been beaten to death at the expense of > > > all parties involved > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > |
|||
11-01-2008, 06:47
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
I guess you could or go to a large 8" single , bit the chrome shops
sell them for outrageous prices---$692.00 http://www.iowa80.com/DirectionsWEB/webc...splay.php? itemid=74151 Kurt Horvath 95 PT 42 10AC In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady > > Now we're talking. Can you fit two stacks back there? I'm > serious. This will be an improvement in performance. Two stacks > will dramatically reduce backpressure, which will result in > lower turbo pyrometer temps, and will allow more boost and > more power. A single 5 inch, as compared to the stock 6" > will do the reverse. > > David > '02 LXi, NC > > > Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > One pipe from the turbo then splits to two stacks. > > > > Kurt Horvath > > 95 PT 42 > > 10AC > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > But doesn't the trucking industry run dual exhausts? > > > > > > David Brady > > > '02 LXi, NC > > > > > > Pete Masterson wrote: > > > > > > > > Having recently replaced my muffler (at great expense) -- had I > > to do > > > > it over again, I'd have switched over to a 5" system from turbo to > > > > stack. As others have stated, it's 5" at the turbo outlet and the > > > > standard in the heavy truck industry is 5". > > > > > > > > The only performance difference I notice (between the old blown > > out > > > > muffler and the new one) is that the exhaust-type Jake brake > > seems to > > > > be slightly less effective. > > > > > > > > Pete Masterson > > > > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 > > > > aeonix1@ > > > > On the road at Hohenwald, TN (Natchez Trace Parkway) > > > > > > > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Kurt Horvath wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > For the last four weeks I have queried Detroit Diesel, Custom > > Exhaust > > > > > Fabricators, Several OEM Exhaust Mfg.'s, Marine Exhaust > > Engineers & > > > > > Fabricators, My BB Guru, and anyone else that would lend an > > ear, and > > > > > no one has expressed any apprehension or regard in the respect > > to a > > > > > 5" exhaust system. In fact all parties expressed their surprise > > in > > > > > respect as to why the system would change size at the muffler. > > > > > > > > > > Several owners have modified their systems to 5" from end to > > end, and > > > > > have seen no change in performance. Positive or negative, In > > general > > > > > it was just a matter of convenience in acquiring parts, I won't > > get > > > > > into that. That has recently been beaten to death at the > > expense of > > > > > all parties involved > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > ------ > > > > > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > > > Checked by AVG. > > > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: > > 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.405 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1715 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM > > > |
|||
11-01-2008, 06:50
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
6" SS EXHAUST STACK
But doesn't the trucking industry run dual exhausts? David Brady '02 LXi, NC Pete Masterson wrote:
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)