WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
|
06-22-2008, 12:34
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
Leroy, It's cause bio fuels "complete the carbon cycle". To a degree anyway. The idea is that thru photosynthesis, a plant converts sunlight and carbon dioxide into complex carbohydrates which we then convert into bio fuels. Completing the carbon cycle means that the CO2 released into the atmosphere when we burn the bio-fuel is then removed from the atmosphere thru photosynthesis. Compare this to burning dino fuels, where the CO2 released is extracted from the ground and adds to "new" CO2 to the atmosphere. This is one of the ways that scientists no that humans are responsible for global warming. We look at the age of the carbon in the atmosphere's CO2. What we're finding is that an ever larger percentage of the carbon isotopes in the atmosphere is the same carbon isotope found in dino fuels; i.e, humans put it there thru burning dino fuels. David Brady '02 LXi, NC Leroy Eckert wrote:
|
|||
06-22-2008, 12:35
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
Humans are not responsible for global warming. The sun is. The
earth's average temperatures have fallen for the last ten years, coinciding with a reduction in solar activity as a part of the sun's normal cycle. The mainstream media is ignoring this data, but sooner or later the whole global warming deal is going to be blown out of the water. Scott Forman 86 PT38 that proudly belches hydrocarbons Memphis --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, David Brady wrote: > > Leroy, > > It's cause bio fuels "complete the carbon cycle". To a degree anyway. > The idea is that thru photosynthesis, a plant converts sunlight and carbon > dioxide into complex carbohydrates which we then convert into bio fuels. > Completing the carbon cycle means that the CO2 released into the atmosphere > when we burn the bio-fuel is then removed from the atmosphere thru > photosynthesis. Compare this to burning dino fuels, where the CO2 released > is extracted from the ground and adds to "new" CO2 to the atmosphere. > This is one of the ways that scientists no that humans are responsible for > global warming. We look at the age of the carbon in the atmosphere's CO2. > What we're finding is that an ever larger percentage of the carbon > isotopes in > the atmosphere is the same carbon isotope found in dino fuels; i.e, > humans put > it there thru burning dino fuels. > > David Brady > '02 LXi, NC > > Leroy Eckert wrote: > > > > Alright Pete, it has been 40 years since I did my college chemistry > > classes and I have not done a damn thing with it since. > > I have a question; don't mean to get into a chemistry class on the > > forum; just interested in something. > > If finished bio-diesel has a published average formula of C19H36O2 and > > average common diesel has a formula of C12H23 how is bio-diesel better > > for the air we breath? Does something happen in the combustion > > chamber?? Are the farmers stroking me?? CH4 is clean so to speak. > > > > Leroy Eckert > > 1990 WB-40 Royale > > Dahlonega, GA > > Smoke N Mirrors > > > > --- On *Sat, 6/21/08, Pete Masterson / > > > > From: Pete Masterson > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT > > GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA??? > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com > > Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 4:59 PM > > > > Yes, I was confused by the "autogas" thing. I thought it was CNG. > > However most of the points still apply, although LPG is slightly > > heavier per gallon. > > > > > > Natural gas is primarily methane (CH4) (with small amounts of a > > panoply of more complex gases -- butane, propane, etc.) while LPG > > is a mixture of various gases with the major component being > > either (or both) butane (C4H10) or/and propane (C3H8). Natural > > gas, being primarily methane, is considered a very clean fossil > > fuel due to the small carbon content (1 atom for every 4 hydrogen) > > as it produces the least CO2 per unit of weight of any in this > > class of fossil fuel. > > > > Pete Masterson > > '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 > > El Sobrante CA > > aeonix1@mac. com > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Steve Pfiffner wrote: > > > >> There seems to be some confusion, CNG (compressed natural gas) > >> and LPG > >> (evidently called Autogas in > >> Australia and butane/propane in the US) are not really the same > >> thing. > >> > >> Steve > >> Wannabee > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1511 - Release Date: 6/20/2008 11:52 AM > > > |
|||
06-22-2008, 13:04
Post: #33
|
|||
|
|||
WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
|
|||
06-22-2008, 13:51
Post: #34
|
|||
|
|||
WHY DON'T WE HAVE AUTO GAS AT GAS STATIONS HERE LIKE THEY DO IN AUSTRALIA???
Hey Leroy,
It could be worse. I've lived in/near Berkeley since I was a kid. I've been hearing this kind of stuff for 40 years. Must be something in the tofu. Pete Masterson '95 Blue Bird Wanderlodge WBDA 42 El Sobrante CA "aeonix1@mac.com" On Jun 22, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Leroy Eckert wrote: <snip> |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)