Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Engine Noise difference
12-26-2007, 11:57
Post: #1
Engine Noise difference
Has anyone here had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine and
then moved on up to a forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP engine
forward control? I would just like to know if the latter forward
control Wanderlodges quited the engine noise down. No big deal about
the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have never ridden in a 88
Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon

Jon
Rebel Bird
Bremerton Washington
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2007, 12:05
Post: #2
Engine Noise difference
Jon,

Never been in an 87-89 FC, but I can tell you that when I re-insulated
the doghouse on my 82 FC, it made a HUGE difference. If you haven't
done this project, I recommend it highly.

Scott Forman
86 PT38
Memphis

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:
>
> Has anyone here had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine and
> then moved on up to a forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP
engine
> forward control? I would just like to know if the latter forward
> control Wanderlodges quited the engine noise down. No big deal about
> the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have never ridden in a 88
> Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon
>
> Jon
> Rebel Bird
> Bremerton Washington
>
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2007, 12:26
Post: #3
Engine Noise difference
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Forman" <sforman@...>
wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> Never been in an 87-89 FC, but I can tell you that when I re-
insulated
> the doghouse on my 82 FC, it made a HUGE difference. If you
haven't
> done this project, I recommend it highly.
>
> Scott Forman
> 86 PT38
> Memphis
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone here had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine
and
> > then moved on up to a forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP
> engine
> > forward control? I would just like to know if the latter forward
> > control Wanderlodges quited the engine noise down. No big deal
about
> > the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have never ridden in
a 88
> > Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon
> >
> > Jon
> > Rebel Bird
> > Bremerton Washington
> >
>
Scott when I bought my 78 the previous owner had installed new sound
deaden material. Now I wonder why the folks at the Old Blue Bird
Factory never installed a good sound deaden material? Maybe because
it was not available at the time but those old coaches were expensive
and why on gods green earth did they not work on this area? Scott
when you installed your sound deaden material what was the material
like under the dog house before you installed your new material?

Jon
Rebel Bird
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y4/1942...0c029a.jpg
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2007, 12:50
Post: #4
Engine Noise difference
My 82 did have sound deadening originally. I do not know what it was
when it was new, but it had degerated into basically a rubber mat
with a granular cover that would flake off when you touched it. I am
assuming the granular stuff used to be some sort of foam. The
rubber "base" would easily peel off in large chunks as the adhesive
had degerated. It was all very fragile. This stuff must have been
top-of-the-line at the time, because BB used it all over...engine,
gen compartment, etc.

I peeled off everything I could, cleaned it up, and installed modern
foil-backed insulation with 3M adhesive. A year later when I sold
the coach, it was all holding firm and hadn't loosened at all. It
helped with sound, heat, and made the engine compartment look much
cleaner. I did my gen compartment, too.

Scott

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Forman" <sforman@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Jon,
> >
> > Never been in an 87-89 FC, but I can tell you that when I re-
> insulated
> > the doghouse on my 82 FC, it made a HUGE difference. If you
> haven't
> > done this project, I recommend it highly.
> >
> > Scott Forman
> > 86 PT38
> > Memphis
> >
> > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone here had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine
> and
> > > then moved on up to a forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP
> > engine
> > > forward control? I would just like to know if the latter
forward
> > > control Wanderlodges quited the engine noise down. No big deal
> about
> > > the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have never ridden
in
> a 88
> > > Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon
> > >
> > > Jon
> > > Rebel Bird
> > > Bremerton Washington
> > >
> >
> Scott when I bought my 78 the previous owner had installed new
sound
> deaden material. Now I wonder why the folks at the Old Blue Bird
> Factory never installed a good sound deaden material? Maybe because
> it was not available at the time but those old coaches were
expensive
> and why on gods green earth did they not work on this area? Scott
> when you installed your sound deaden material what was the material
> like under the dog house before you installed your new material?
>
> Jon
> Rebel Bird
> http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y4/1942...0c029a.jpg
>
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2007, 13:27
Post: #5
Engine Noise difference
Jon:

The Silver editions (87 to89) use a much better sound insulation than
previous models. I dont know the composition but it is a blanket type
material and seems to stand up really well. Mine is still attached and
has no holes. NOw the Genset is another story. BB used this horrible
but expensive pyramidal foam that deteriorates from : heat, fumes, road
grime and time. Not a fun job to remove the gennie and reinsulate.

Bruce
1988 FC35
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2007, 15:05
Post: #6
Engine Noise difference
Bruce,

What did you re-insulate with? Even my '02 is cursed with
the disintegrating pyramid foam.

thanks,
David Brady
'02 LXi, NC

birdshill123 wrote:
>
> Jon:
>
> The Silver editions (87 to89) use a much better sound insulation than
> previous models. I dont know the composition but it is a blanket type
> material and seems to stand up really well. Mine is still attached and
> has no holes. NOw the Genset is another story. BB used this horrible
> but expensive pyramidal foam that deteriorates from : heat, fumes, road
> grime and time. Not a fun job to remove the gennie and reinsulate.
>
> Bruce
> 1988 FC35
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.28/1123 - Release Date: 11/10/2007
3:47 PM
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
12-27-2007, 00:48
Post: #7
Engine Noise difference
David Brady:

I used a material that is almost the same as what Steven Birtles
sells. The hardest part is removing all the old insulation. Wear a good
dust mask. This is one dirty job. I did post an article in the files
section. There are some photos as well. Look for onan insualting.doc

Bruce 1988 FC35
Quote this message in a reply
12-27-2007, 03:00
Post: #8
Engine Noise difference
We have an album in the other forum with pictures of
the Britles insulation , try here:

http://autos.ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/w...rowse/be65

The surface must be really clean and use contact cement.

Or try Stephen Birtles web site for a description of the insulation.

http://www.dupreeproducts.com/

Bill 88 FC Michigan






--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "birdshill123"
wrote:
>
> David Brady:
>
> I used a material that is almost the same as what Steven Birtles
> sells. The hardest part is removing all the old insulation. Wear a
good
> dust mask. This is one dirty job. I did post an article in the
files
> section. There are some photos as well. Look for onan insualting.doc
>
> Bruce 1988 FC35
>
Quote this message in a reply
12-28-2007, 04:53
Post: #9
Engine Noise difference
Jon,

Noise is hard to discribe and it is subjective,
With out using a DB noise meter.

So , My unscientific opinion:

It has been a long time since I drove or rode in a 210,
But my opinion is , the 300 Hp is quieter,
I feel the turbo helps cancel noises.
and mostly the air intake filter in located outside in the
passenger side bay under the front bumper.
Intakes on most motors transmit motor noise.

The insulation on the late model FC's 87,88,89 ,
is a thick blanket, It looks like heat shield blankets.
The Doghouse carpet and padding is thick and plush.
No trouble having a normal conversation with Patty the co-pilot.

The only person I know is Bob Janes , 87 FC Greenville , N.C.
He ownes both a 210NA and the 300 hp turbo.

Hope this helps,

Bill 88 FC Michigan





--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:
>
> Has anyone here had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine and
> then moved on up to a forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP
engine
> forward control? I would just like to know if the latter forward
> control Wanderlodges quited the engine noise down. No big deal
about
> the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have never ridden in a
88
> Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon
>
> Jon
> Rebel Bird
> Bremerton Washington
>
Quote this message in a reply
12-28-2007, 08:29
Post: #10
Engine Noise difference
I agree. Our 84 FC had the Cat 250hp 3208T. Even with the electric radiator
fan turning, it was not much worse than a normal pickup (back then).
Brad Barton 00LXiDFWbbartonwx@...


To: WanderlodgeForum@...: billpatty@...: Fri, 28 Dec
2007 16:53:33 +0000Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Engine Noise difference




Jon,Noise is hard to discribe and it is subjective,With out using a DB noise
meter.So , My unscientific opinion:It has been a long time since I drove or rode
in a 210, But my opinion is , the 300 Hp is quieter, I feel the turbo helps
cancel noises.and mostly the air intake filter in located outside in the
passenger side bay under the front bumper.Intakes on most motors transmit motor
noise.The insulation on the late model FC's 87,88,89 , is a thick blanket, It
looks like heat shield blankets.The Doghouse carpet and padding is thick and
plush.No trouble having a normal conversation with Patty the co-pilot.The only
person I know is Bob Janes , 87 FC Greenville , N.C.He ownes both a 210NA and
the 300 hp turbo.Hope this helps,Bill 88 FC Michigan--- In
WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jon" wrote:>> Has anyone here
had an older Wanderlodge with the 210 HP engine and > then moved on up to a
forward control Wanderlodge with a 300 HP engine > forward control? I would just
like to know if the latter forward > control Wanderlodges quited the engine
noise down. No big deal about > the engine noise with my old 78 but since I have
never ridden in a 88 > Wanderlodge I just would like to know. Thanks Jon> > Jon>
Rebel Bird> Bremerton Washington>






_________________________________________________________________
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGH...ows_122007

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)