315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight

03-26-2009, 14:29

Post: #15

birdshill123
Unregistered

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight

Ron Marabito:

Talking tires is like talking politics. Every one has an opinion. I dont think
an RV'r would install Michelins for read wear. AS you stated we will never wear
them out. I just installed 6 Michelin XZE's on our 88FC35. I went for Michelin
because they are the best. Better handling for one. You have to be very carefull
when buying truck tires for an RV. Some are steer axle only. Some are drive axle
only. I look at what the buses in Mexico run and it is Michelin by a long shot.
There are cheaper options and I happen to think there is a reason why they spend
the extra money. It is one thing to buy a cheap battery. If it fails you get
another. Tires are the only thing between you and the road. If it
fails..................!

Bruce
1988 FC35

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 14:04

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 16:25

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 16:47

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 17:41

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 18:33

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 04:46

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - davisgr - 03-25-2009, 05:59

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 06:58

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Fred Hulse - 03-25-2009, 13:49

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-25-2009, 14:02

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 14:38

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - sfedeli3 - 03-26-2009, 01:17

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-26-2009, 13:20

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-26-2009, 13:26

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-26-2009 14:29

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Steve Pfiffner - 03-26-2009, 14:48

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-26-2009, 15:19

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-26-2009, 15:40

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - rogerwwebb@... - 03-26-2009, 20:16

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - birdshill123 - 03-27-2009, 04:07

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:29

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:31

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:37

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 05:21

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 06:09

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 07:02

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Wayne Kotila - 03-27-2009, 07:20

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Pete Masterson - 03-27-2009, 08:33

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Kurt Horvath - 03-27-2009, 11:02

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 12:17

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Bob Lawrence - 03-27-2009, 12:27

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:44

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:46

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 14:46

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 03-28-2009, 05:11

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Jim Riordan - 04-01-2009, 14:23

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - ronmarabito2002 - 04-03-2009, 02:50

315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight - Don Bradner - 04-03-2009, 07:43

User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)