+- Wanderlodge Gurus - The Member Funded Wanderlodge Forum (http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com)
+-- Forum: Yahoo Groups Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=61)
+--- Forum: WanderlodgeForum (/forumdisplay.php?fid=63)
+--- Thread: Ride heigth (/showthread.php?tid=5950)
Ride heigth - amweath - 11-05-2007 12:44
My PT36 sits 6 to 8 inches high in the rear, both sides, w/suspention
fully inflated. The front is normal. It seems unlikely to have two mal-
adjusted levelors. Is there something else I should be looking at?
If it is indeed the levelors, is it much of a job to adjust them?
Art Weatherly
Riverside Ca
'85 PT36
Ride heigth - mbulriss - 11-05-2007 14:36
Art,
Check the specs in your Blue Box. I believe my 83 was higher in the
raer and it was per the specs in the Blue Box. The late Sid Clark
and I checked it one time at a Lone Star Birds rally to verify the
settings.
FWIW.....
Mike Bulriss
1991 WB40 "Texas Minivan"
San Antonio, TX
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "amweath"
wrote:
>
> My PT36 sits 6 to 8 inches high in the rear, both sides, w/suspention
> fully inflated. The front is normal. It seems unlikely to have two mal-
> adjusted levelors. Is there something else I should be looking at?
> If it is indeed the levelors, is it much of a job to adjust them?
>
>
> Art Weatherly
> Riverside Ca
> '85 PT36
>
Ride heigth - Leroy Eckert - 11-06-2007 00:02
Mine has an approximate ride height of 16" in the front and between 18-19" in
the rear. This is measured in front behind the front wheel from the body skin
and in the rear measured in front of the drive wheel from the body skin. I
wouldn't know if yours should be the same.
Leroy Eckert
1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors"
Dahlonega, GA
mbulriss <mbulriss@...> wrote: Art,
Check the specs in your Blue Box. I believe my 83 was higher in the
raer and it was per the specs in the Blue Box. The late Sid Clark
and I checked it one time at a Lone Star Birds rally to verify the
settings.
FWIW.....
Mike Bulriss
1991 WB40 "Texas Minivan"
San Antonio, TX
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "amweath"
wrote:
>
> My PT36 sits 6 to 8 inches high in the rear, both sides, w/suspention
> fully inflated. The front is normal. It seems unlikely to have two mal-
> adjusted levelors. Is there something else I should be looking at?
> If it is indeed the levelors, is it much of a job to adjust them?
>
>
> Art Weatherly
> Riverside Ca
> '85 PT36
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Ride heigth - Curt Sprenger - 11-06-2007 14:28
Art,
I measured my ride height Home Depot paint stick (a paint stick for a 5 gal.
bucket). I drew lines on a stick several years ago after Bennie informed me
of the ride heights. I carry the stick in the bus, and use it to verify
front & rear ride height. The line for the front is at 16", 18" for the
rear. Bennie said the ride height could vary by 1", + or -. and the rear
should always be higher than the front.
Your issue, my guess, is the ride height valves need to be cleaned out or
replaced. I experienced one side would ride high, increasing the other sides
height some. Installing new ride height valves eliminated the problem, so
far.
On 11/5/07, amweath
>
> My PT36 sits 6 to 8 inches high in the rear, both sides, w/suspention
> fully inflated. The front is normal. It seems unlikely to have two mal-
> adjusted levelors. Is there something else I should be looking at?
> If it is indeed the levelors, is it much of a job to adjust them?
>
> Art Weatherly
> Riverside Ca
> '85 PT36
>
>
>
--
Curt Sprenger
1987 PT38 8V92 "MacAttack Racing"
Anaheim Hills, CA
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Ride heigth - Don Bradner - 11-06-2007 14:55
Leroy, are those measurements just "what they are" or is it based on something
that says that's "the way they should be"?
I assume mine and yours would be the same, but I have not seen anything to
indicate what mine should be. I measured today at the points you indicate, and
they are 14-1/4 front, and 16-1/4 rear. That would appear to be a couple of
inches low, on both counts.
Don Bradner
90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
Eureka, CA
On 11/6/2007 at 4:02 AM Leroy Eckert wrote:
>Mine has an approximate ride height of 16" in the front and between
>18-19" in the rear. This is measured in front behind the front wheel from
>the body skin and in the rear measured in front of the drive wheel from
>the body skin. I wouldn't know if yours should be the same.
>Leroy Eckert
>1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors"
>Dahlonega, GA
Ride heigth - Leroy Eckert - 11-06-2007 22:17
The measurements are just what they are. I have no data showing what it should
or should not be. I do know the rear sits a couple inches higher than the front.
I would bet yours is within specification.
Don Bradner
Leroy, are those measurements just "what they are" or is it based on something
that says that's "the way they should be"?
I assume mine and yours would be the same, but I have not seen anything to
indicate what mine should be. I measured today at the points you indicate, and
they are 14-1/4 front, and 16-1/4 rear. That would appear to be a couple of
inches low, on both counts.
Don Bradner
90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
Eureka, CA
On 11/6/2007 at 4:02 AM Leroy Eckert wrote:
>Mine has an approximate ride height of 16" in the front and between
>18-19" in the rear. This is measured in front behind the front wheel from
>the body skin and in the rear measured in front of the drive wheel from
>the body skin. I wouldn't know if yours should be the same.
>Leroy Eckert
>1990 WB-40"Smoke N Mirrors"
>Dahlonega, GA
Leroy Eckert
1990 WB-40 "Smoke N Mirrors"
Dahlonega, GA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]