Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Single axle pusher models
03-15-2006, 23:03
Post: #1
Single axle pusher models
What is the feeling among the Faithful on the single axle models. They
didn't stay in production that long from what I have seen. Are there any
inherent problems with the design?

Thanks!

~~~~~
--PirateJohn--
Directeur Sportif, Team Confuzed

_www.BuccaneerPress.com_ (http://www.buccaneerpress.com/) , home of
PirateJohn's Most Unique Guide to Motorcycling In Northeastern Florida and the
*FREE*
Florida Keys Adventure Guide


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
03-17-2006, 00:01
Post: #2
Single axle pusher models
As none of the SP owners have answered I'll give it a try. I own an '87 FC, the
little brother to the SP.

The SP is a popular model with many happy owners. The engine is the 300 HP 3208
with the ZF transmission. From what owners tell me this engine and transmission
are as adequate as most Wanderlodges. The SP has more head room than the FC's
and naturally has more room around the front seats. There is always a debate
over engine maintenance, which is easier to work on, the front engine FC or the
rear engine SP. The only complaint I hear from the SP owners is the lack of the
downshift switch under the throttle peddle that the FC has.

As far as only one rear axle goes, the newer 380 is also single axle and that
doesn't seem to be a problem.

Hope this helps.

Jack
'87 FC 35 "Traveller" (For Sale)
Franklin, NC

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
03-17-2006, 15:14
Post: #3
Single axle pusher models
Hi Jack
(I would never greet you like this at an airport)
I forgot the qusestion about the SP
Juergen in PA
1991 WLSP 36

Jack Bentley wrote: As none of the SP owners have
answered I'll give it a try. I own an '87 FC, the little brother to the SP.

The SP is a popular model with many happy owners. The engine is the 300 HP 3208
with the ZF transmission. From what owners tell me this engine and
transmission are as adequate as most Wanderlodges. The SP has more head room
than the FC's and naturally has more room around the front seats. There is
always a debate over engine maintenance, which is easier to work on, the front
engine FC or the rear engine SP. The only complaint I hear from the SP owners
is the lack of the downshift switch under the throttle peddle that the FC has.

As far as only one rear axle goes, the newer 380 is also single axle and that
doesn't seem to be a problem.

Hope this helps.

Jack
'87 FC 35 "Traveller" (For Sale)
Franklin, NC

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS
Recreational vehicles
Wanderlodge Automotive maintenance
Recreational vehicle dealer Used
recreational vehicles Automotive
radiators

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "WanderlodgeForum" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)