Spring vs: air suspension
|
07-17-2006, 22:21
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
Spring vs: air suspension
Please sign your post so that we know who we are responding to. I
have a 1980 with air suspension and in my biased opinion it rides as well as and better than most other manufacturers new models. The 1980 (as well as later FC's) utilize 2 bags per wheel whereas many other manufacturers use 1. As far as pulling a toad, I have thousands of miles pulling a 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sahara and have also pulled a Jeep Cherokee with no problem. Granted the 210 hp can be a bit slow in the hills but the idea is relaxation and enjoying the ride/scenery and at 8-9 mpg I don't mind being a bit slow in the hills. Keep in mind also that the the old FC's are rated to carry more than most other (ie plastic) manufacturers are rated to tow. Hope this helps, John Stiles 1980 33FC "My Navion" --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gcyeaw" > > Can anyone out there give me an evauation of the diference between > the spring and air suspension ride? I am looking at some early 1980 FC > units and they have the spring suspension. Tey also have the 210 HP NA > engine, which may not be enough to tow a toad. > > Any comments would be appreciated.. > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Spring vs: air suspension - gcyeaw - 07-16-2006, 15:01
Spring vs: air suspension - John Stiles - 07-17-2006 22:21
Spring vs: air suspension - warren madson - 07-18-2006, 07:02
Spring vs: air suspension - dthollis1961 - 07-18-2006, 08:52
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006, 13:04
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006, 13:29
Spring vs: air suspension - Curt Sprenger - 07-19-2006, 02:15
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)