Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Spring vs: air suspension
07-18-2006, 08:52
Post: #4
Spring vs: air suspension
I owned a 78 FC33 with leaf springs and now own an 84 FC35 with air
ride. The ride is better in the 84, but the handling in the 78 was
more precise and the ride wasn't objectional at all.

The difference to me with the 84 compared to the 78 is the
combination of ALL the
upgrades: air ride, turbo, retarder, larger diesel generator and
higher gearing which lowers engine speed and noise.

David Hollis 84 FC35 Springfield,IL


--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gcyeaw" wrote:
>
> Can anyone out there give me an evauation of the diference
between
> the spring and air suspension ride? I am looking at some early
1980
FC
> units and they have the spring suspension. Tey also have the 210
HP
NA
> engine, which may not be enough to tow a toad.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated..
>
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Spring vs: air suspension - gcyeaw - 07-16-2006, 15:01
Spring vs: air suspension - John Stiles - 07-17-2006, 22:21
Spring vs: air suspension - warren madson - 07-18-2006, 07:02
Spring vs: air suspension - dthollis1961 - 07-18-2006 08:52
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006, 13:04
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006, 13:29
Spring vs: air suspension - Curt Sprenger - 07-19-2006, 02:15



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)