Spring vs: air suspension
|
07-18-2006, 13:04
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
Spring vs: air suspension
Sorry, I forgot to put my name in the post. Is there a way to have it
automaticaly placed at the end on every post. I was looking at my profile but couldn't figure it out. Thanks for the replies. I do like the idea of the retarder and other upgrades, particularly the turbo in '85, but a real well kept older unit is also very attractive. Thanks Gardner Wanabe --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "gcyeaw" > > Can anyone out there give me an evauation of the diference between > the spring and air suspension ride? I am looking at some early 1980 FC > units and they have the spring suspension. Tey also have the 210 HP NA > engine, which may not be enough to tow a toad. > > Any comments would be appreciated.. > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Spring vs: air suspension - gcyeaw - 07-16-2006, 15:01
Spring vs: air suspension - John Stiles - 07-17-2006, 22:21
Spring vs: air suspension - warren madson - 07-18-2006, 07:02
Spring vs: air suspension - dthollis1961 - 07-18-2006, 08:52
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006 13:04
Spring vs: air suspension - Gardner Yeaw - 07-18-2006, 13:29
Spring vs: air suspension - Curt Sprenger - 07-19-2006, 02:15
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)