Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms)
|
05-26-2007, 04:02
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms)
Goodmorning Ralph. Thanks for the info but most important, to see that you are
feeling a somewhat better this morning. Bill 84 FC 35 SB "$quanderlodge" Terrace, B.C. Canada ----- Original Message ---- From: Ralph L. Fullenwider To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 8:05:00 AM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) ASTM D-975 is now the standard lubricity mandate by the EPA. We all know that the low sulphur (15ppm) fuels are here to stay. In producing this low sulphur diesel, some of the lubricity is also removed, not by design but by the process to attain Low sulphur fuels to meet the new EPA standards. The above lubricity mandate for diesel fuel is being met by the various manufacturers of our diesel fuels to combat the removal of lubricants that go with the low sulphur diesel, which adds additives back into the #1 and # 2 diesel which we all use, to meet the ASTM D-975 standard. In talking with a chemist from one of the major refineries of gas and diesel, I was told that the lubricity of the low sulphur diesel fuel will "not" be changed by adding ATF to our tank when we fuel at a truck stop. In short, adding ATF when we fuel will not help the lubricity of diesel fuel. Yes, there will be a small percentage of diesel engines that will show wear on seals and liners and on the fuel injection pumps and injectors from their design, but the over the road engines we have in our Coaches will not be affected because of the mandate by the EPA to bring the lubricity additives back that is lost in the process. The engines that will show the wear will be in the bracket of diesels used in cars, pick up trucks, that were hybrid engines such as the early diesel units in pick up trucks, and so forth. I should imagine this will re open a can of worms, but I was one of the people that was going to add ATF to my tank, and upon doing some reading and talking with those who ran the tests in the labs, I will not be adding ATF to my Kitty CAT as it is already done for me by the Refineries to the new Federal standard. One thing that will help more than anything else is dedication to oil changes and increasing the amount of times we change engine oils and filters. I am no chemist by any stretch and have concluded this change of thought about adding ATF by what I have read and have been told by those in the "know." So $1.55 and this e-amil will get you a cup of coffee in most places. Safe travels, Ralph and Charolette Fullenwider 84FC35 Duncan, Oklahoma ( feeling much better this morning) Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 05-26-2007, 03:05
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - truitt44@...> - 05-26-2007, 03:37
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - Wilhelmus Schreurs - 05-26-2007 04:02
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 05-26-2007, 04:12
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - Ralph L. Fullenwider - 05-26-2007, 05:22
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - four_heavyfeet - 05-26-2007, 11:27
Low Sulphur fuel (can of worms) - davidkerryedwards - 05-26-2007, 14:33
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)