Manual Transmission for FC (was Re: Question for John H.....)
|
12-28-2007, 12:08
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Manual Transmission for FC (was Re: Question for John H.....)
This topic has certainly received my attention, especially as I have not yet
changed my 5.29 rear and the last gear of a new transmission would dictate the proper rear ratio. The bulk of my over-the-road experience was with a 13 speed. These 12513 Roadrangers are readily available. I wonder about the travel and shape of the gear shift lever Mike has fashioned. He has apparently done some engineering. My Wanderlodge parts book depicts the clutch pedal assemblies of FCs with manual transmissions. I have a Peterbilt conventional with a 3406B Cat and 12515 15 speed (10 speed normal with 5 speed deep reduction). I could study the parts involved and learn more. Mike once mentioned a problem with resale which might be valid. I wonder how much deterrent a manual transmission would be if it was dialed in correctly and gave the operator more control, more torque when necessary and lots of top-end when the terrain allowed it. Personally, I'd be willing to spend the money and labor to perform the 'upgrade'. I'm just not sure how much work engineering the clutch would entail. I assume a new bell housing would be necessary. With proper selection of the rear end ratio, the number of gears available would insure that the engine could be kept in the optimum rpm range at any road speed. This is definitely 'food for thought'. Donn '76 FC33 South Kingstown, RI ________________________________________ From: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hohnstein Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 3:37 PM To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Question for John H. on his Wanderlodge's Extended Gri... I hear that. I bought my first medium duty truck due to it's Allison 653. Some time later I was brought up to speed with my first 10 speed rig. ----- Original Message ----- From: bubblerboy64 To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 2:08 PM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: Question for John H. on his Wanderlodge's Extended Gri... Mike, Most people do not want anything to do with a manual shift anything these days but I have to agree that these old FC BB's are dying to have a better transmission. Keep me in the loop. In other words. You work out the bugs and the details and maybe down the road.... John Heckman central Pa 1973 FC > > I had a CVT in my Honda Civic Hybrid. A great concept, worked well in the small car. It seems the OEMs are having problems with CVT as power and weight increase. Probably why you see 6 speed and even some 8 speed automatics becoming more common. > My experience with the 10/13 spd had led me to the conclusion that nothing else will work for me. > A 13 spd with OD is the perfect transmission. Ya can back up at walking speed in LL reverse and top over 90 in 13 over. It don't get better than that in my world. > As a side light, I can offer this experience we had with the race car early in the season. Car ran 9.0 @ 150 mph with the 5 speed manual with air at 1000' corrected. Put a youngster in the car and chose to change to a T-400 with 8" converter. All produced in my shop so we know what the set ups are. Way too hard to find a youngster that can even drive a stick let alone under stand what "power shift" means. I do require he shift the auto matic by hand however. At any rate in comparable conditions the car lost 4 mph and about a tenth of a second, or a little over a car length at the stripe. It's all relative you know. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)