'94 BMC 39K
|
06-18-2008, 05:28
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
'94 BMC 39K
John,
weight seems to be 31,000lbs compared to an '87 FC35 at 34,000lbs, looks to me like with similar power (300hp) the BMC has a slight weight advantage and an extra gear, they could be correct on the performance claim. Steve Wannabee ----- Original Message ----- From: "bubblerboy64" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:16 AM Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Re: '94 BMC 39K >I wonder how that bus would perform. I am not in the market (but who > knows down the road) there are things I like about the BMC's but I > noticed a couple things which I would want to consider. Power being > one. That coach is about 7 tons heavier and 100 hp more the "The > Napper" and one of the reasons to even consider moving up would be to > be able to climb hills a little better. The comment was made about it > climbing hills with ease or something similar. My thoughts are I > might not be all that much better off. Boy, if I would move I would > only want to do it once and for a BIG improvement. So, although this > is a good price I am not certain that there are as many pluses as I > would need to move. So how do these 300 hp cummins run down the road > for you guys who have had more then one BB? > John Heckman > central Pa > 1973 FC |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
'94 BMC 39K - Steve Pfiffner - 06-18-2008, 00:09
'94 BMC 39K - bubblerboy64 - 06-18-2008, 00:35
'94 BMC 39K - Don Bradner - 06-18-2008, 03:32
'94 BMC 39K - bubblerboy64 - 06-18-2008, 04:16
'94 BMC 39K - Steve Pfiffner - 06-18-2008 05:28
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)