Should we even be looking at Old Birds?
|
06-24-2008, 05:48
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
Should we even be looking at Old Birds?
MIKE:
All the things u say are true AND I have all of that in my 90SP especially the GREAT ZF transmission...the largest transmission mmaker in europe..they make trannys for BMW's and Mercedes etc. As for my START recommendation at a low budget entry price, The 80FC31 is NOT underpowered and the valve adjust is not something the wife can do and I would hope the Swingout radiator mod has been made...maybe Leroy can find a 1980FC31 with a swingout radiator for less than 20 grand verses finding a 1987 of your recommedation for probably over 40 grand.....WE do not know his budget from what he wrote. LOL hope all is well in texas.....Naty & I will get to a Texas rally when Deisel drops below $3............."Dream...Dream..Dream!" Regards, Hank 90SP36 --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "michaelhohnstein" <MHOHNSTEIN@...> wrote: > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "campingleroy" > > > I have experience with quite a few mid 80s Birds, buying selling > and "fixing on." My 83 rear bath suits the wife and I real well and > I wouldn't trade it for a triple slide anything. Not even a Newell. > That being said, I recommend 87 and newer FCs for those who wish to > get into a vintage Bird. The engine and accessories are much easier > to maintain due to improved design engine cover and swing radiator. > 86 and older are a pain to adjust valves on, and that's not good. > Moreover the 87 up has a charge air cooler and 300 hp., a very > welcome feature when trying to get down the road. The ZF trans is a > great piece and features OD. > My 83 has been upgraded to 87 specs. Fiberglass engine cover, > charge air cooler and inlet air enhancements. The Allison is backed > by a drive line OD transmission in front of the Jake retarder. > I was able to do all this 'stuff' to my Bird due the line of work > I'm in. Much easier to just pay a little more and get the newer > version, and it's all done for you. > MH > > > > > > My wife and I really like a lot of things about vintage birds, > > including the safety, reliability, and durability. I think a mid > 80s > > FC would be about the best fit for us and our budget. The one > with a > > double bed in the back, and 2 couches up front. > > > > I dont mind tinkering and working on a lot of projects. Our > current > > coach is a 1989 Class C, I had to rebuild the entire cab over on > that. > > But I'm by no means a mechanic. I do consider myself to be very > > mechanically inclined though. I can follow directions really > well, if > > there are procedures on doing projects though. And based on what > I > > know or believe things to cost, I can't afford to have a mechanic > do > > every bit of maintenance these things need. The electrical > problems > > concern me much less than mechanical ones. > > > > My question is, should I steer away from these old birds? Is the > > majority of the work something that an average person could do > given > > patience and research/reading? Don't want to get myself in over > my > > head. > > > > I would DEFINATELY want to hire someone to look at a unit before > > purchasing, to make sure I understood what I was getting myself > into. > > If I get to that point, I'll be asking here for recommendations on > who. > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - campingleroy - 06-23-2008, 16:47
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-24-2008, 01:19
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Ryan Wright - 06-24-2008, 04:39
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Wilhelmus Schreurs - 06-24-2008, 05:05
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008, 05:10
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - michaelhohnstein - 06-24-2008, 05:35
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008 05:48
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jon - 06-24-2008, 05:53
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-24-2008, 07:04
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Michael - 06-24-2008, 08:29
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jack & Donna Smith - 06-24-2008, 12:23
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - campingleroy - 06-24-2008, 15:25
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - mariopatti1 - 06-24-2008, 16:18
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008, 16:51
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Leroy Eckert - 06-25-2008, 00:32
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 00:48
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 01:14
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - dwalks@... - 06-25-2008, 02:43
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bumpersbird - 06-25-2008, 03:36
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jack & Donna Smith - 06-25-2008, 04:26
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 06:23
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - walker172 - 06-25-2008, 06:34
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Ryan Wright - 06-25-2008, 12:01
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - David Brady - 06-25-2008, 14:53
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)