Should we even be looking at Old Birds?
|
06-25-2008, 06:34
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
Should we even be looking at Old Birds?
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jack & Donna Smith"
> > As one with practical experience with a "Vintage" Bird, I second the > idea of staying away from a coach that needs a lot, or even some > work. > You will have enough work "sprucing up" and making the coach "Yours" > and you don't want any extra tasks, if possible. > Although these things are called "RVs", they really are not, as you > will soon find out when you take one to a regular RV shop for much > more than awning replacment, or new floormats.. > In the few cases I have had to tow the coach, I have always tried to > impress on them that this is a BIG 31' BUS, and the front axel is > sone 5 feet in back of the front bumper. When the tow truck > arrives, the driver usually says, "I should of Brought our Big > Truck"! > The rule of thumb is that you should have a fund of some $10K to > cover repairs, fix-ups, and other items. Tires can run $3 to 4 > hundred each. > I think an 83 or so would be a good starting point, with the Turbo > and Air Bags. > Also, if you live in one of those "Wunnerful" HOA's, be prepared to > hear, "Get that big ugly thing out of here", and add in $150 a month > or so to store it elsewhere, and remember that usually you cant work > on it or wash it at the storage lot. > But, Welcome to the world of Wanderlodges and all the quality people > you will meet in "The Family".... > Jack Smith > 1973FC31 > SoCal. > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "campingleroy" > > > > > Wow tons of great feedback and fast! This forum definately seems > > very helpful, and really helps me feel more comfortable about > making > > a step toward an older coach, and knowing i have a team to help me > > figure things out. > > > > I think that I'd be better at actually doing the > repairs/maintenance > > than troubleshooting problems at least on the mechancial stuff, > until > > I got to know things a bit more. > > > > A bit more background on us. We're late 20s, early 30s, with 2 > girls > > under 3 years old. We currently travel about 1 big trip a year > and 2- > > 4 more smaller weekend trips. We expect that will increase again > as > > the girls get older (read out of diapers and crib). > > > > I work in IT with computers for a living, and have done nearly > every > > type of work around the house and my RV, with only limited > mechanical > > work. > > > > I think we'd like an 83 or 84 FC based on all i read. They have > the > > power of the Turbo, and also air suspension, but still aren't too > > pricey. We want the diesel engine and the diesel generator. We > want > > the one with twin couches up front, and a double bed in the back. > > > > I dont have an exact budget at the moment. Obviously the less I > > could spend the better, but I want the most reliable coach I can > get > > too. I would like to spend near $20K. > > > > Thanks for all the great feedback. I had heard a lot of good > stuff > > about this place from the RV.NET group, and it definately seems > like > > you've got a great group. > > > > > > We actually went and checked out an 83 this weekend. Floor plan > was > > cool, perfect. But it left me with a lot of questions. Here's an > > excerpt from what I wrote on RV.NEt about it. > > > > "Late last night I found a deal on an old 1983 Wanderlodge an hour > or > > so south of me. We've been thinking for a few years that it would > be > > very nice to have an old Bird. This deal seemed too good to be > true, > > $12,000. I'd never personally been inside a vintage bird, so i > > figured now is a good time to go see if they'd really be a good > fit > > for us. The seller was selling on behalf of his brother and didn't > > know much about it. > > > > Engine started right up, but the smell of diesel was extremely > strong > > outside the front end, passenger side. Is that normal? > > > > The diesel genset didn't want to start up, he thought it was fed > by a > > separate tank, but I dont think that is the case. > > > > Outside was rough, definately needed a new coat of paint. Inside > was > > decent. Was nice being in an older unit with not a signle sign of > a > > leak. Much of the uppolstry needed to be replaced, couchs, chairs, > > dinnettes. And the carpet was ugh-riginal. > > > > 12V electrical system was great for lights, but nearly everything > on > > the dash was dead. Gauges seemed to work, but switches were all > > useless. A/C, Heat etc didnt work. > > > > As for the 110V stuff, I couldn't test with no genset and no shore > > power. > > > > Awnings needed some help, but I was about done by the time I got > to > > them, that I didn't even check them out. > > > > Man, this thing could be nice to someone who wants to put a bit of > > time into it, just not sure I'm really up to it at this point in > the > > game. > > > > Question is, should I lowball this guy? And see if I can get it at > a > > price where I could pay someone else to fix the broken "stuff"? > Any > > factor sound like sign of something much worse? > > " > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Jack & Donna Smith" > > > > > > > > > > > Old Bird or Newer?? Well, as some say, "You Pays Your Money, > and > > > Takes Your Choice"... > > > Our 1973 Bird lacks some of the items that are standard on Newer > > > coaches, but also lack some of the headaches..What is > a "Sporlian > > > Valve", anyway, or "Air Operated Sreps"? > > > As my old pappy said, "What ain't there, cant break". > > > Some costs are less, such as my yearly DMV fee of $67,(even here > in > > > the Land of Arnold), and lower Insurance costs, and it afforded > me > > > my unique method of financing, One Payment & walk away with the > > Pink > > > Slip.. > > > But make no mistake, repairs may be necessary, and as Jeff > Miller > > > said, "Pay Now, oor Pay Later". > > > The old coaches are much simpler and therefore easier (read > Cheaper) > > > to maintain. > > > The great thing about Bluebirds is that they practically never > wear > > > out. A lot of the original items on our coach are still > working, > > > while I imagine my old "Sticks & Staples Tioga is probably in > that > > > Big KOA in the Sky... > > > We also like to visit the various RV dealers and look over the > > > current crop.. It is real interesting to see the look on the > > > salesmans face when he asks us if we have an RV and we > reply, "Yes, > > > a Bluebird". We are usually left alone after that...... > > > Jack Smith > > > 1973FC31 > > > SoCal > > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Michael" <mike.putz@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I also agree with everything I've read here. I own a 63 > Bluebird > > > > conversion and just recently purchased a 78FC35. I choose > this > > > bus > > > > to upgrade to a diesel, leveling jacks, bigger generator, > etc.. > > I > > > > did not want air bags as I like to go off road often with a > > > trailer > > > > full of quads and dirt bikes. I wanted something tough with > > > ground > > > > clearance. I had the pleasure of driving my friends 90SP36 > from > > > > Texas to Arizona not long ago. It was very nice, plush, > fancy, > > > and > > > > strong with the 300 HP Cat. However, it was just not for me. > So > > > old > > > > or new.. you can't go wrong with these busses. I'm a "bang- > for- > > > buck" > > > > kind of guy on a small budget so the FC's were perfect! > > > > Just another 2 cents... > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > 78FC35 "Putz'n Around" > > > > Mesa, Az > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "bubblerboy64" > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Leroy, I think everything that has been said is on target. > You > > > > > certainly want the best that you can buy. No doubt the > later > > > FC's > > > > > are considerably improved and being newer should in theory > at > > > least > > > > > be in better condition. That being said there is always the > > > debate > > > > as > > > > > to how much a guy should spend on an FC before he considers > a > > > PT. I > > > > > have never ridden in or experienced a late model FC but my > > > thoughts > > > > > are if I was going to spend upwards of 50K would I add to it > a > > > > little > > > > > (or a lot) and go with a PT. These are things you have to > > > decide. > > > > I > > > > > was there a year ago and I am certain all of us would agree > > that > > > > you > > > > > should invest in some travel and time to investigate a > number > > of > > > > > these coaches before you buy. I think personal preference > and > > > how > > > > > you are going to use the coach are the critical things to > > > > consider. > > > > > I love my old 1973 but if I was intending to make a lot of > long > > > > runs > > > > > I would consider moving up. My coach is also smallish for > more > > > then > > > > > two. I consider it like buying any vehicle you want to match > it > > > to > > > > > your use as well as your pocket book. > > > > > John Heckman > > > > > central Pa > > > > > 1973 FC > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "michaelhohnstein" > > > > > > <MHOHNSTEIN@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "campingleroy" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have experience with quite a few mid 80s Birds, buying > > > > selling > > > > > > > and "fixing on." My 83 rear bath suits the wife and I > real > > > > well > > > > > > and > > > > > > > I wouldn't trade it for a triple slide anything. Not > even > > a > > > > > Newell. > > > > > > > That being said, I recommend 87 and newer FCs for those > who > > > > wish > > > > > to > > > > > > > get into a vintage Bird. The engine and accessories are > > much > > > > > easier > > > > > > > to maintain due to improved design engine cover and > swing > > > > > radiator. > > > > > > > 86 and older are a pain to adjust valves on, and that's > not > > > > good. > > > > > > > Moreover the 87 up has a charge air cooler and 300 hp., > a > > > very > > > > > > > welcome feature when trying to get down the road. The > ZF > > > trans > > > > > is > > > > > > a > > > > > > > great piece and features OD. > > > > > > > My 83 has been upgraded to 87 specs. Fiberglass engine > > > cover, > > > > > > > charge air cooler and inlet air enhancements. The > Allison > > > is > > > > > > backed > > > > > > > by a drive line OD transmission in front of the Jake > > > retarder. > > > > > > > I was able to do all this 'stuff' to my Bird due the > line > > of > > > > work > > > > > > > I'm in. Much easier to just pay a little more and get > the > > > > newer > > > > > > > version, and it's all done for you. > > > > > > > MH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My wife and I really like a lot of things about > vintage > > > > birds, > > > > > > > > including the safety, reliability, and durability. I > > > think a > > > > > mid > > > > > > > 80s > > > > > > > > FC would be about the best fit for us and our budget. > > The > > > > one > > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > double bed in the back, and 2 couches up front. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont mind tinkering and working on a lot of > projects. > > > Our > > > > > > > current > > > > > > > > coach is a 1989 Class C, I had to rebuild the entire > cab > > > over > > > > > on > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > But I'm by no means a mechanic. I do consider myself > to > > > be > > > > > very > > > > > > > > mechanically inclined though. I can follow directions > > > really > > > > > > > well, if > > > > > > > > there are procedures on doing projects though. And > based > > > on > > > > > what > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > know or believe things to cost, I can't afford to have > a > > > > > mechanic > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > every bit of maintenance these things need. The > > > electrical > > > > > > > problems > > > > > > > > concern me much less than mechanical ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is, should I steer away from these old > > birds? > > > Is > > > > > the > > > > > > > > majority of the work something that an average person > > > could > > > > do > > > > > > > given > > > > > > > > patience and research/reading? Don't want to get > myself > > > in > > > > > over > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > head. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would DEFINATELY want to hire someone to look at a > unit > > > > > before > > > > > > > > purchasing, to make sure I understood what I was > getting > > > > myself > > > > > > > into. > > > > > > > > If I get to that point, I'll be asking here for > > > > recommendations > > > > > > on > > > > > > > who. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would just say this and that is buy from a person who > loves > > > his > > > > > old > > > > > > coach! Pay a little bit more but then most of the work has > > > been > > > > > done. > > > > > > As far as Vlv adjustment that only happens every 50,000 > miles > > > and > > > > > my > > > > > > coach has only had that done two times. Yep and beside my > old > > > > coach > > > > > > gets 10 mpg (1978) and the newer ones well we all know > they > > > were > > > > > made > > > > > > for cheap fuel prices in mind. Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - campingleroy - 06-23-2008, 16:47
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-24-2008, 01:19
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Ryan Wright - 06-24-2008, 04:39
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Wilhelmus Schreurs - 06-24-2008, 05:05
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008, 05:10
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - michaelhohnstein - 06-24-2008, 05:35
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008, 05:48
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jon - 06-24-2008, 05:53
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-24-2008, 07:04
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Michael - 06-24-2008, 08:29
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jack & Donna Smith - 06-24-2008, 12:23
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - campingleroy - 06-24-2008, 15:25
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - mariopatti1 - 06-24-2008, 16:18
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Henry Jay Hannigan - 06-24-2008, 16:51
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Leroy Eckert - 06-25-2008, 00:32
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 00:48
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 01:14
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - dwalks@... - 06-25-2008, 02:43
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bumpersbird - 06-25-2008, 03:36
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Jack & Donna Smith - 06-25-2008, 04:26
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - bubblerboy64 - 06-25-2008, 06:23
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - walker172 - 06-25-2008 06:34
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - Ryan Wright - 06-25-2008, 12:01
Should we even be looking at Old Birds? - David Brady - 06-25-2008, 14:53
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)