NADA Wanderlodge Listings

[rrueckwald]

I am a little concerned with the other side of the ethics question. For insurance, the only reason an owner would want to have a high NADA well over what they paid is to make a quick buck if they had a total loss. Is that appropriate? For financing, the only reason an owner would want to have a high NADA well over what they paid is to short the bank on the amount of equity in the bus. Is that appropriate? Neither in my book.

Having too low a value is obviously a disservice to owners of those busses.

As they say across the pond, "This is a sticky wicket!"